Counsel registry
Mayer Brown
45 case appearances — 18 as plaintiff counsel · 27 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
Mayer Brown is a global BigLaw firm with its headquarters in Chicago, Illinois. The firm maintains an extensive international footprint with offices across the Americas, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, operating in over 20 cities and 10 countries. As of 2025, Mayer Brown was ranked among the top 50 largest law firms by revenue, coming in at #27 on the AmLaw Global 200 list with 1,766 lawyers, and #44 on the Vault Top 100 law firms in 2026.
Mayer Brown's Intellectual Property litigation practice has a broad scope, frequently handling disputes in federal district courts, the US International Trade Commission (ITC), and the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The firm specializes in patent litigation across a diverse array of technologies, including mobile devices, semiconductors, LCD panels, telecommunications, display technologies, consumer electronics, computer software and hardware, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals. Its IP practice also covers trademark and copyright infringement, unfair competition, false advertising, trade secret misappropriation, and IP-related antitrust violations.
The firm demonstrates a balanced approach in its patent litigation practice, having represented defendants in 16 tracked cases and plaintiffs in 9 tracked cases. This includes defending operating companies against patent assertions and prosecuting for patent owners. Notable cases include representing Maxell, Ltd. in actions against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Lenovo Group Ltd., and Pantech Corporation against OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. The firm also represented LG Display Co., Ltd. as plaintiff in a case against Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. In one instance, Mayer Brown secured a $10.3 million verdict for a Korean cellphone manufacturer.
Mayer Brown has a significant Post-Grant Review (PGR) practice, particularly in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Several tracked cases show the firm defending patent owners against challenges brought by Unified Patents before the PTAB, including matters involving Samsung Electronics, Maxell Ltd., Powermat Technologies, and Pantech Corp. Robert G. Pluta, a key partner, has been lead counsel in over 100 IPR proceedings.
Key partners in the firm's patent litigation practice include Robert G. Pluta, a trial lawyer with extensive experience in patent disputes across various forums and technologies, who also leads the firm's PTAB efforts. Jamie B. Beaber leads the firm's Section 337 Litigation and Offensive Patent Litigation practices, focusing on patent matters before the ITC and district courts, with significant experience in IPRs covering display and telecommunication technologies. Saqib J. Siddiqui, a former patent examiner, protects patent rights in district courts, the ITC, and the USPTO, with particular expertise in PTAB proceedings and mobile device technologies. James A. Fussell, III (Tripp) is also a prominent attorney, often serving as lead counsel for technology companies in federal district courts, the ITC, and the PTAB, with a focus on simplifying complex technologies for juries.
Attorneys
Roles
- counsel43
- lead counsel35
- pro hac vice25
- Counsel24
- back-up counsel22
- counsel in related litigation15
- Lead Counsel10
- Back-Up Counsel8
- pro hac vice counsel8
- defense counsel8
- of counsel; trial counsel8
- patent owner attorney6
- backup counsel6
- petitioner counsel6
- counsel for patent owner5
- Associate4
- Partner4
- of record4
- Backup Counsel3
- Patent Owner Attorney3
- secondary attorney3
- associate2
- of counsel2
- trial counsel2
- Attorney1
- attorney of record1
- Lead counsel1
- secondary counsel1
- participating attorney1
- participating counsel1
- lead trial counsel1
- lead counsel; trial counsel1
- petitioner lead counsel1
- petition counsel1
- lead defense1
Cases (45)
- Δ defendantDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc.Jamie B. Beaber · Lead counsel
- Δ defendantDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al.Robert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al.Robert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantDelaware Display Group LLC v. LG Display Co.Robert G. Pluta · petitioner lead counsel
- Δ defendantInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyBaldine B. Paul · attorney of record
- Δ defendantInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hyundai Motor GroupBaldine B. Paul · Counsel
- π plaintiffK.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- π plaintiffK.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantK.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. et al. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. et al. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCJamie B. Beaber · lead counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Display Group LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Display Group LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Display Group LLCAlison T. Gelseleicher · counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead trial counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCJamie B. Beaber · lead counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. et al.Jamie B. Beaber · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffLG Electronics, Inc. v. Delaware Display Group LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel; trial counsel
- Δ defendantLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCJamie B. Beaber · lead defense
- π plaintiffMaxell, Ltd. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al.Jamie B. Beaber · lead counsel
- π plaintiffMaxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Robert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- π plaintiffMaxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Saqib J. Siddiqui · patent owner attorney
- Δ defendantMotorola Mobility LLC v. Maxell, Ltd.Jamie B. Beaber · lead counsel
- Δ defendantOmni Medsci, Inc. v. Fossil et al.James A. Fussell, III · counsel
- Δ defendantOnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Pantech Wireless, LLCJames A. Fussell III · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffPantech Corporation et al. v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.James A. Fussell III · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffPantech Corporation et al. v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.James A. Fussell, III · lead counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung v. Maxell, Ltd.Robert G. Pluta · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantTianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. v. LG Display Co., Ltd.Amanda Bonner · Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents PTAB Data v. Powermat Technologies LtdRobert G. Pluta · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Maxell LtdSaqib J. Siddiqui · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Maxell Ltd.Robert G. Pluta · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Pantech CorpJ. David Fussell · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al.Robert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseAlan M. Grimaldi · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseJasjit S. Vidwan · counsel in related litigation
- π plaintiffUntitled caseJamie Benjamin Beaber · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseJames A. Fussell III · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseSaqib J. Siddiqui · counsel for patent owner
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRobert G. Pluta · lead counsel
- Δ defendantZepp Inc. et al. v. Oura Health OyMichael L. Lindinger · lead counsel