Patent litigation attorney
Robert G. Pluta
13 tracked appearances — 4 plaintiff · 9 defendant.
Specialty & background
Robert G. Pluta is a seasoned patent litigation attorney and a Partner at Mayer Brown, based in Chicago. His practice is exclusively devoted to intellectual property litigation and appeals, with a strong emphasis on patent disputes in U.S. District Courts, the International Trade Commission (ITC), inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and Federal Circuit appeals. Pluta's technological expertise spans a wide array of areas, including mobile devices, semiconductors, LCD panels, telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.
Pluta demonstrates a balanced approach to patent litigation, having represented both plaintiffs and defendants. While his tracked appearances show a slightly higher count on the defendant side (9 defendant vs. 4 plaintiff cases), his firm profile indicates experience representing both patent holders and challengers, particularly in PTAB proceedings. Before joining Mayer Brown, he gained valuable in-house perspective as Senior Intellectual Property Counsel at Motorola Mobility LLC, where he directed litigation strategy, and also held roles at Steptoe & Johnson LLP and Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione.
His notable case work includes representing Sandoz in Hatch-Waxman litigation involving the drug XyZal® (levocetirizine hydrochloride) and LG Electronics in Federal Circuit appeals such as ATI Technologies ULC v. LG Electronics, Inc.. He successfully represented Google in a PTAB challenge, Google Inc. v. Zuili, where the board invalidated patent claims under Section 101 and for obviousness. His case list highlights active involvement in matters for prominent technology companies like Maxell, Samsung, Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, LG Electronics, and Fossil, as well as multiple IPR challenges brought by Unified Patents.
Pluta is particularly active in PTAB proceedings, having served as lead counsel in over 100 IPR proceedings, underscoring his extensive experience in post-grant patent challenges. He is admitted to practice in Illinois and the District of Columbia, and before numerous federal courts, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He earned his J.D. from DePaul University College of Law in 2002 and a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Marquette University in 1999.
Firms
Roles
- Lead Counsel3
- counsel3
- lead counsel2
- patent owner attorney1
- counsel for patent owner1
- counsel in related litigation1
- Partner1
- Counsel1
Cases (13)
- Δ defendantDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc.Mayer Brown · Counsel
- π plaintiffMaxell, Ltd. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al.Mayer Brown · counsel
- π plaintiffMaxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Mayer Brown · lead counsel
- π plaintiffMaxell, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Mayer Brown · patent owner attorney
- Δ defendantMotorola Mobility LLC v. Maxell, Ltd.Mayer Brown · counsel
- Δ defendantOmni Medsci, Inc. v. Fossil et al.Mayer Brown · counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung v. Maxell, Ltd.Mayer Brown · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents PTAB Data v. Powermat Technologies LtdMayer Brown · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Maxell LtdMayer Brown · Partner
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Maxell Ltd.Mayer Brown · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al.Mayer Brown · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseMayer Brown · counsel for patent owner
- π plaintiffUntitled caseMayer Brown · counsel in related litigation