Jamie B. Beaber

Jamie B. Beaber is a prominent patent litigator and partner at Mayer Brown, where he leads the firm's Section 337 Litigation and Offensive Patent Litigation Practices. With a background in electrical engineering, his practice focuses on high-technology disputes before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and U.S. district courts nationwide. His technical expertise spans areas including display technologies, optics, power management, graphics processing, video streaming, microprocessors, and telecommunication standards.

Beaber's practice demonstrates experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants in patent disputes. Of his six tracked appearances, four have been on the plaintiff side and two on the defendant side. He counsels clients on patent assertion campaigns, as evidenced by his role in cases such as Maxell, Ltd. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al. and multiple Pantech Corporation et al. v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. matters. He also defends companies against infringement allegations, having represented clients like LG Electronics Inc. in Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc. and Motorola Mobility LLC against Maxell.

Notably, Beaber was part of the Mayer Brown trial team that secured a significant jury verdict of nearly $112 million for Maxell in patent litigation against Samsung Electronics, related to video and photo playback and networking technologies. However, this verdict was later overturned by judgment as a matter of law for Samsung. He also led the team that achieved a trial victory for Pantech Corporation against OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., where a jury found willful infringement of patents related to wireless communication and user interface technologies, awarding substantial damages. In LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. et al., a dispute involving LCD and OLED display patents, the parties reached a settlement.

Beaber has extensive experience in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB), representing clients in various technology areas. This includes representation in IPR proceedings such as Motorola Mobility LLC v. Maxell, Ltd. and involvement in matters like Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. v. LG Display Co., Ltd., where an IPR petition was denied. He is a member of the District of Columbia and Michigan Bars and is admitted to practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the D.C. Court of Appeals, and several U.S. District Courts, including the Eastern District of Texas.