Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. AQ Corporation
Pending- Docket:
- IPR2026-00234
- Filed:
- 2026-01-26
This Inter Partes Review (IPR) case was filed by Samsung Electronics against AQ Corporation challenging US patent 11728564.
Plaintiff
15 cases as plaintiff.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is a South Korean multinational electronics corporation headquartered in Suwon, South Korea. Founded in 1969, it is the flagship subsidiary of the Samsung Group. Samsung Electronics is a publicly traded company under the ticker KRX: 005930. The company is a major global enterprise, with an estimated 266,673 employees. For the fiscal year 2024, the company reported revenues of approximately $220.7 billion.
As one of the world's largest technology companies, Samsung Electronics operates two main divisions: Device eXperience (DX) and Device Solutions (DS). The DX division produces a wide array of consumer electronics, including its well-known Galaxy smartphones, tablets, and wearable devices, as well as TVs, projectors, sound devices, and digital home appliances like refrigerators and washing machines. The DS division manufactures electronic components, and is a global leader in semiconductors, producing memory (DRAM and NAND flash), system LSI, and providing foundry services for other companies.
Samsung’s patent litigation profile is primarily that of a large operating company defending itself against infringement allegations. The provided data shows Samsung as a defendant in 11 of 13 tracked cases, a typical posture for a company with a vast product portfolio. Many of these suits are filed in plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions, particularly the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In two instances, Samsung has acted as a plaintiff at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a common strategy for defendants to challenge the validity of asserted patents.
The case list shows Samsung is frequently targeted by non-practicing entities (NPEs). Several entities appear as repeat plaintiffs against the company, including VB Assets, LLC, Gaea, LLC, and Lepton Computing LLC, all of which have filed suits in the Eastern District of Texas. The two plaintiff-side cases initiated by Samsung are PTAB petitions challenging the validity of patents held by VB Assets, LLC and Topwire LLC, corresponding to defensive actions against lawsuits brought by these entities.
Watchlist
Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.
This Inter Partes Review (IPR) case was filed by Samsung Electronics against AQ Corporation challenging US patent 11728564.
A petition for inter partes review (IPR) of US Patent 9,824,035 filed by Samsung. The PTAB declined to institute the review due to procedural reasons.
Samsung filed an Inter Partes Review petition against patent 10468047. The PTAB has instituted the review, and the case is currently pending.
This Inter Partes Review (IPR) case was initiated by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. against Xifi Networks R&D Inc. before the PTAB, challenging US patent 11974143. The IPR has been instituted and is currently pending.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc., challenging US patent 11716171B2. The petition was filed on June 24, 2025, and the case is currently instituted, with a Final Written Decision due on January 12, 2027.
A declaratory judgment action for non-infringement filed by Samsung against Netlist. The case is currently active.
An Inter Partes Review filed by Samsung entities against VB Assets, LLC for US Patent 8073681 was not instituted due to procedural reasons.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied institution of this inter partes review concerning US patent 10812646.
In this action, Samsung seeks a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of the '846 patent. A motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted, but the court is allowing Samsung to conduct jurisdictional discovery.
An inter partes review (IPR) proceeding where Samsung challenges the patent's validity. The PTAB has also instituted a trial in this proceeding.
Samsung filed this IPR against Netlist's US Patent 10,268,608. The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision on October 31, 2024, finding certain claims unpatentable, which decision was affirmed by the Federal Circuit on December 11, 2025.
This is an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding initiated by Samsung. The PTAB has instituted a trial, having determined a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail on at least one of the challenged claims.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed a post-grant review petition at the PTAB challenging patent 12193790, which was procedurally denied institution.
Samsung entities filed an Inter Partes Review (IPR) against Chien-Min Sung, challenging US Patent 8974270. Oral arguments are scheduled for June 19, 2025.
An Inter Partes Review (IPR) case filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. against Staton Techiya, LLC at the PTAB, which concluded with a Final Written Decision.