Counsel registry
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
59 case appearances — 23 as plaintiff counsel · 36 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. is a premier intellectual property (IP) boutique firm headquartered in Washington, D.C., operating with a single office but boasting national and international reach. The firm, founded in 1978, has grown to include over 200 lawyers, patent agents, and technical specialists, with many holding advanced scientific and engineering degrees. Consistently recognized by Vault as a "Best Midsize Law Firm" in Washington, D.C. and for "Intellectual Property" nationally, Sterne Kessler is also highly ranked by Chambers USA for its Patent Prosecution (Band 1), Patent Litigation, and Patent Trial and Appeal Board practices.
The firm's patent litigation practice covers a broad spectrum of cutting-edge technologies. Its experience spans biopharmaceuticals and life sciences, including cases involving pharma (e.g., Harmony Biosciences v. AET Pharma, Biocon Biologics v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries), AI, and gene-editing technologies (CRISPR). Sterne Kessler also maintains a robust practice in electronics, semiconductors, software, communications, and medical devices, as evidenced by its work in matters such as Samsung Electronics v. Netlist, Redstone Logics v. Qualcomm, GOOGLE v. Sandpiper Cdn, and VideoLabs v. Roku.
Sterne Kessler works actively on both the plaintiff and defendant sides of patent disputes, though its tracked appearances show a slight lean towards defendant-side representations (16 defense, 10 plaintiff). The firm has secured notable outcomes, including representing Netlist in a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas jury verdict awarding $118 million in damages against Samsung, and successfully defending a Netlist patent before the PTAB. However, in a separate appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the cancellation of another Netlist patent (10,217,523 B1) in a case against Samsung, where Sterne Kessler also represented Netlist. The firm also represented Teva Pharmaceuticals in Allergan v. Teva, securing a district court judgment invalidating six patents that was successfully defended on appeal, and in Vanda Pharmaceuticals v. Teva, where all claims were invalidated at trial and affirmed by the Federal Circuit. The firm's work in Apple v. Samsung design patent litigation also resulted in a significant settlement in excess of half a billion dollars.
The firm possesses a particularly strong and nationally recognized Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice. Sterne Kessler has served as counsel in over 1,300 PTAB proceedings and is consistently ranked among the top firms for activity and performance by Patexia's PTAB Intelligence Report. The firm has been named "PTAB Firm of the Year" by Managing IP Americas Awards four times, including in 2026. Prominent IP litigation partners include J.C. Rozendaal, Chair of the firm's Trial & Appellate Practice Group, who is noted for his first-chair trial work and appellate advocacy. Byron L. Pickard, the firm's new Managing Director, is an experienced trial lawyer and appellate advocate who has handled over 100 IPR proceedings. Eldora L. Ellison, Ph.D., co-chairs the PTAB Trials practice and has extensive experience in over 80 inter partes review and post-grant review proceedings, particularly in biotechnology. Jason D. Eisenberg, a director in the Electronics Practice Group, leads the firm's Reexamination, Supplemental Examination, and Reissue Practice and has been involved in hundreds of PTAB proceedings.
Attorneys
Roles
- Counsel41
- counsel31
- lead counsel29
- Lead Counsel24
- Back-up Counsel12
- Director11
- Attorney9
- of counsel8
- Respondent Counsel2
- back-up counsel2
- Backup Counsel2
- Lead Counsel (PTAB)1
- Counsel (PTAB)1
- local counsel1
- Petitioner Counsel1
- Trial and Appellate Group Leader1
- Lead counsel1
- likely lead counsel1
- counsel of record1
- Attorney for Patent Owner1
- Lead Counsel for PTAB1
- Co-counsel for PTAB1
Cases (59)
- Δ defendantAlpha Modus, Corp. v. Mood Media, LLCSteven M. Pappas · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantAstellas Pharma Inc. et al. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.J.C. Rozendaal · lead counsel
- π plaintiffBank of America, N.A. et al. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLCRichard A. Crudo · counsel of record
- π plaintiffBiocon Biologics, Inc. et al. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.J.C. Rozendaal · lead counsel
- Δ defendantCaihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. v. Corning IncorporatedJason D. Eisenberg · Respondent Counsel
- Δ defendantCarma Technology Corp. et al. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al.Naveen Modi · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantDr. Edwin A. Hernandez et al. v. Stingray Group Inc. f/k/a Stingray Digital Group, Inc. et al.Michael D. Specht · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffExcalibur IP, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Michael E. Joffre · likely lead counsel
- Δ defendantGE Healthcare Ltd. v. The Johns Hopkins UniversityEldora L. Ellison · lead counsel
- Δ defendantGOOGLE LLC v. Sandpiper Cdn LLCJason D. Eisenberg · lead counsel
- π plaintiffHarmony Biosciences Management Inc et al. v. AET Pharma US Inc et al.J.C. Rozendaal · lead counsel
- π plaintiffITM Isotope Technologies Munich SE v. The Johns Hopkins UniversityDavid Kohn · Petitioner Counsel
- Δ defendantITM Isotope Technologies Munich SE v. The Johns Hopkins UniversityEldora L. Ellison · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantMerck KGaA v. Hopewell Pharma Ventures, Inc.J.C. Rozendaal · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantMerck Serono SA v. TWI Pharmaceuticals Inc.Philip D. Segrest Jr. · lead counsel
- Δ defendantMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC v. Halozyme Inc.Eldora L. Ellison · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC v. Halozyme Inc.Eldora L. Ellison · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantMerck v. Apotex Inc. et al.John Christopher Rozendaal · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantMicron Technology, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.Richard M. Bemben · lead counsel
- Δ defendantMPHJ Technology Investments, LLC v. Ricoh Americas Corporation et al.Jon Wright · lead counsel
- π plaintiffNetlist Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.William Milliken · counsel
- π plaintiffNetlist, Inc. v. Google, Inc. et al.Daniel E. Yonan · Director
- π plaintiffNetlist, Inc. v. SamsungRichard M. Bemben · Lead Counsel for PTAB
- Δ defendantPetitioner v. Halozyme, Inc.Eldora L. Ellison · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantRedstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al.Jon E. Wright · lead counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Netlist, Inc.Richard M. Bemben · lead counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Netlist, Inc.Richard M. Bemben · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantSitNet LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.Steven M. Pappas · Lead counsel
- π plaintiffSoundClear Technologies LLC v. Google, LLCJonathan M. Cohen · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffTAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED et al. v. Marlin Semiconductor LtdRyan C. Richardson · lead counsel
- π plaintiffTempus AI Inc v. Guardant Health IncByron L. Pickard · Counsel
- π plaintiffTempus AI Inc. v. Guardant Health Inc.Byron L. Pickard · Trial and Appellate Group Leader
- π plaintiffTOUGHBUILT INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Meridian International Co Ltd.Richard M. Bemben · lead counsel
- π plaintiffTwinstrand Biosciences Inc. v. Guardant Health Inc.Byron L. Pickard · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantTwinstrand Biosciences Inc. v. Guardant Health Inc.Lori A. Gordon · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents LLC v. Halozyme IncRalph W. Powers, III · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Corning Inc.Jason D. Eisenberg · Respondent Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Corning Inc.Jason D. Eisenberg · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents v. Evolution Malta Ltd.Jon E. Wright · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Halozyme IncEldora L. Ellison · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Intellectual Ventures II LLCJonathan M. St. Vein · counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Sandpiper Cdn LLCJason D. Eisenberg · counsel
- π plaintiffUnified Patents, LLC v. AutoConnect Holdings LLCJon E. Wright · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents, LLC v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc.Dennies Varughese · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseJ.C. Rozendaal · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseJon E. Wright · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDaniel E. Yonan · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseSteven M. Pappas · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseMichael D. Specht · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseJ.C. Rozendaal · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseMichael R. Joffre · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseEldora L. Ellison
- Δ defendantUntitled caseJohn Christopher Rozendaal · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseEldora L. Ellison · Attorney for Patent Owner
- Δ defendantVeloxis Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.J.C. Rozendaal · lead counsel
- Δ defendantVeloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USAMaureen Rurka · lead counsel
- Δ defendantVideoLabs, Inc. v. Roku, Inc.Lestin L. Kenton Jr. · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffVirtamove Corp. v. Oracle Corp.Jon E. Wright · Counsel
- π plaintiffVisa USA Inc v. Cortex MCP IncNaveen Modi · Lead Counsel (PTAB)