Litigation

Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v. Chiaro Technology, Ltd. d/b/a Elvie

dismissed with prejudice (consent judgment of non-infringement)

2:23-cv-00631-KKE

Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Filed
2023-04-28
Terminated
2026-01-05

Patents at issue (4)

Defender signal. 2 of these patents have had claims invalidated at PTAB. Those final written decisions are public record and a ready-made § 102 / § 103 ground in district court. See IPR estoppel for what carries over.

Summary

Momcozy entities filed a DJ action against Chiaro/Elvie regarding the '893 patent. Elvie counterclaimed and later asserted the '893, '380, '381, and '454 patents against Momcozy's V1 and V2 products. The case was stayed due to Chiaro's bankruptcy and resolved by a consent judgment of non-infringement for Momcozy and dismissal with prejudice of Elvie's infringement counterclaims.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).