Invalidity dossier

US 8775833

Current assignee: Daedalus Prime LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 6:49:17 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges4 lawsuits on fileasserted by Daedalus Prime LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US8775833B2

Title: Dynamically allocating a power budget over multiple domains of a processor

Patent number / application: US8775833B2; Application US13/780,066; publication US20130179704A1

Inventors: Avinash N. Ananthakrishnan; Efraim Rotem; Doron Rajwan; Eliezer Weissmann; Nadav Shulman

Assignee: Original assignee Intel Corp; current assignee listed as Daedalus Prime LLC

Key dates: Priority date 2011-09-06; filing date 2013-02-28; publication date 2014-07-08; anticipated expiration 2031-09-06. Legal status listed as Active.

Purpose: Processors now incorporate ever-increasing amounts of circuitry, evolving from independent integrated circuits to multicore processors with multiple cores plus other functional units (e.g., graphics engines, fixed-function units, accelerators). Different circuitry consumes differing power based on workload, and suitable mechanisms to ensure these units have sufficient power did not previously exist.

Plain-language scope: The patent describes dynamically apportioning a processor's power budget at run time across multiple domains. A "domain" is a collection of hardware and/or logic operating at the same voltage and frequency point. In an example, a multicore processor has at least a core domain and a graphics domain that collectively share a single power budget—so higher core-domain frequency leaves less power for the graphics domain, and vice versa. Embodiments dynamically re-partition the package power budget between domains, providing a power-balancing mechanism. Additional domains are contemplated, including per-core domains, domains of fixed-function units or accelerators, and a domain for certain management agents receiving a fixed portion of the total budget. A power budget management (PBM) algorithm may be executed by logic such as a power control unit (PCU) to control the power of an entire processor or an individual domain to a configured power limit, based partly on parameters such as a guaranteed frequency (P1). The excerpt names FIGS. 1–8 covering methods, graphical illustrations, and block diagrams.

Not established by this excerpt: The full claim language, the complete algorithm details, and the omitted portions of the specification. Nothing here should be read as a validity, infringement, or prior-art conclusion.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8775833](/patent/US8775833)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:33 PM

Cases on file (4)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8775833. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Daedalus Prime LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Daedalus Prime LLC

This patent in court (4)

4 tracked lawsuits name US 8775833.