Litigation

Smart Speaker LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC

Active litigation

2:25-cv-00707

Filed
2025-07-11

Patents at issue (1)

Plaintiffs (1)

Defendants (1)

Summary

A district court case filed by Smart Speaker LLC against Amazon.com Services LLC, asserting US patent 12316706. The litigation remains active since its filing on July 11, 2025.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Smart Speaker LLC, identified as a patent assertion entity (PAE) or non-practicing entity (NPE), initiated patent infringement litigation against Amazon.com Services LLC, a global technology and e-commerce giant. The lawsuit, filed on July 11, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, targets Amazon's widely used Alexa-enabled products, specifically naming Amazon Echo devices, and the underlying technology controlled via Amazon's cloud servers. The plaintiff acquired the asserted patents from May Patents on March 18, 2025, shortly before filing the complaint, a common pattern for PAEs.

The core of the dispute centers on U.S. Patent No. 12,316,706, along with several other patents including 12,010,174, 11,128,710, 11,190,590, 12,401,720, and 12,401,721, asserted in the First Amended Complaint. U.S. Patent No. 12,316,706 generally relates to systems and methods for digital media streaming or content delivery, particularly in a networked environment. The procedural posture of the case places it before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas, a venue recognized for its significant patent litigation docket and often considered favorable to patent holders.

This litigation is notable due to Smart Speaker LLC's apparent role as an NPE asserting patents acquired from another entity against a prominent technology company with a substantial market presence in smart home devices. The case highlights ongoing patent assertion trends in the smart speaker and voice assistant technology sector. Furthermore, Amazon.com Services LLC has already challenged the validity of at least one of the asserted patents, US Patent 12,316,706, by filing an Inter Partes Review (IPR2026-00146) with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) on November 21, 2025, which was instituted on May 6, 2026. This IPR proceeding runs in parallel to the district court litigation, a common defensive strategy to challenge patent validity outside of court.

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Key Legal Developments in Smart Speaker LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC

The patent infringement lawsuit, Smart Speaker LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-00707, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on July 11, 2025. Presiding over the case is District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Smart Speaker LLC initially asserted U.S. Patent No. 12,316,706, among others, against Amazon.com Services LLC.

Filing & Initial Pleadings

  • Complaint Filed: Smart Speaker LLC initiated the lawsuit on July 11, 2025.
  • First Amended Complaint: On October 6, 2025, Smart Speaker LLC filed a First Amended Complaint for patent infringement, asserting U.S. Patents 12,316,706, 12,010,174, 11,128,710, 11,190,590, 12,401,720, and 12,401,721.
  • Motions to Dismiss:
    • An initial motion to dismiss (Filing 15) was denied as moot on October 10, 2025, likely in response to the filing of the First Amended Complaint.
    • Amazon.com Services LLC filed a subsequent "MOTION to Dismiss in Part Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim" (Filing 36). Responses and replies were filed through December 2025. The outcome of this motion is not publicly available as of May 29, 2026.
  • Answer and Counterclaims: Details regarding Amazon's answer to the amended complaint or any counterclaims are not publicly available from the provided information.

Pre-trial Motions of Substance

  • E-Discovery Order: A "Joint Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order" was filed by Amazon.com Services LLC (Filing 43) and an "ORDER REGARDING E-DISCOVERY" (Filing 45) was signed by Judge Gilstrap on December 10, 2025.

Claim Construction (Markman)

  • A Markman/Claim Construction Hearing has been set for December 14, 2026, at 9:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.

Discovery Milestones

  • Beyond the initial e-discovery order in December 2025, specific strategic discovery milestones are not detailed in the available information.

Trial Events

  • Pretrial Conference: A Pretrial Conference is scheduled for May 3, 2027, at 9:00 AM.
  • Jury Selection: Jury Selection is set for June 7, 2027, at 9:00 AM.

Final Disposition or Present Posture

The case remains in active litigation, with scheduled Markman and trial dates in late 2026 and mid-2027, respectively. There is no public record of a settlement, dismissal, or judgment as of May 29, 2026.

Parallel PTAB IPR/PGR Proceedings

Amazon.com Services LLC has filed multiple Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions against Smart Speaker LLC concerning patents asserted in the district court litigation:

  • IPR2026-00146: Filed on November 21, 2025, by Amazon.com Services LLC, this IPR specifically challenges U.S. Patent No. 12,316,706. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted the review on May 6, 2026.
  • IPR2026-00145: Also filed on November 21, 2025, by Amazon.com Services LLC, this IPR challenges U.S. Patent No. 11,128,710. The institution decision date for this IPR was April 2, 2026, and the IPR was instituted.
  • IPR2026-00148: Filed on November 21, 2025, by Amazon.com Services LLC against Smart Speaker LLC. The status is pending.
  • Other IPRs: Amazon.com Services LLC has also filed IPR2026-00276 and IPR2026-00280, challenging U.S. Patents 12,401,721 and 12,401,720, respectively, which are also asserted in the district court case. The status of these IPRs is pending.

The institution of IPR2026-00146 challenging the primary patent-in-suit (US 12,316,706) could significantly impact the district court litigation, potentially leading to a stay of the district court proceedings, or influencing claim construction and invalidity arguments.

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Here is the counsel of record representing Smart Speaker LLC in Smart Speaker LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-00707:

  • Clark Theodore Gordon

    • Role: Counsel
    • Firm: Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLP, California office
    • Experience Note: Mr. Gordon is a registered patent attorney with significant experience litigating high-stakes patent cases in federal courts, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and at the International Trade Commission (ITC). He represents patent owners in complex, multi-defendant litigations and has secured significant outcomes for his clients. He also represents Smart Speaker LLC in related IPR proceedings.
  • Justin Kurt Truelove

    • Role: Counsel (likely local counsel given the Eastern District of Texas venue and other counsel being from California/New York firms).
    • Firm: Truelove Law Firm.
    • Experience Note: Mr. Truelove has appeared on behalf of Smart Speaker LLC in this case. His firm, Truelove Law Firm, is based in Tyler, Texas, suggesting a local counsel role for Eastern District of Texas cases.
  • Vincent J. Rubino, III

    • Role: Counsel (likely lead counsel or part of the primary litigation team).
    • Firm: Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLP (listed as "Fabricant Llp - Ny" on one docket, suggesting a New York office or connection).
    • Experience Note: Mr. Rubino has appeared on behalf of Smart Speaker LLC. His firm, Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLP, specializes in patent litigation.
  • Ryan F. Oliver

    • Role: Counsel (likely part of the primary litigation team).
    • Firm: Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLP (listed as "Fabricant LLP").
    • Experience Note: Mr. Oliver has appeared on behalf of Smart Speaker LLC. His firm, Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLP, focuses on patent litigation.
  • Peter Lambrianakos

    • Role: Counsel (likely part of the primary litigation team).
    • Firm: Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLP (listed as "Fabricant LLP").
    • Experience Note: Mr. Lambrianakos has appeared on behalf of Smart Speaker LLC. His firm, Fabricant Rubino Lambrianakos LLP, is involved in patent litigation.

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Amazon.com Services LLC is represented by attorneys from Fish & Richardson P.C. and Perkins Coie LLP, as well as in-house counsel.

Here is the counsel of record representing Amazon.com Services LLC:

  • Matthew Robert Stephens

    • Role: Counsel
    • Firm: Fish & Richardson P.C., Dallas, TX office (likely given typical practice of national firms in EDTX).
    • Experience Note: Mr. Stephens entered an appearance on behalf of Amazon.com Services LLC on December 8, 2025. Fish & Richardson is a prominent intellectual property law firm with extensive experience in patent litigation across various venues, including the Eastern District of Texas, and represents clients in high-stakes patent matters.
  • Susan Morrison

    • Role: Counsel, Managing Principal of Fish & Richardson's Delaware office (often involved in significant patent cases).
    • Firm: Fish & Richardson P.C., Delaware office.
    • Experience Note: Ms. Morrison is a patent trial lawyer with over fifteen years of experience, including representing defendants in patent litigation related to communications by handheld devices and securing early summary judgment of patent invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Her experience also includes Hatch-Waxman litigation in the Eastern District of Texas.
  • Jessica Kaiser

    • Role: Lead Counsel in related IPR proceedings.
    • Firm: Perkins Coie LLP, Denver, CO office.
    • Experience Note: Ms. Kaiser is listed as lead counsel for Amazon.com, Inc. in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding, demonstrating her involvement in challenging patent validity before the PTAB. Perkins Coie has a strong patent litigation practice, with over 120 experienced patent litigators and a significant presence in post-grant proceedings before the PTAB.
  • Robin Brewer

    • Role: Backup Counsel in related IPR proceedings.
    • Firm: Perkins Coie LLP, San Francisco, CA office.
    • Experience Note: Ms. Brewer is listed as backup counsel for Amazon.com, Inc. in an IPR proceeding, indicating her involvement in patent validity challenges.
  • Jonathan R. Carter

    • Role: Counsel in related IPR proceedings.
    • Firm: Perkins Coie LLP, New York, NY office.
    • Experience Note: Mr. Carter is listed as counsel for Amazon.com, Inc. in an IPR proceeding.
  • Steven Beigelmeier

    • Role: Counsel in related IPR proceedings.
    • Firm: Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA office.
    • Experience Note: Mr. Beigelmeier is listed as counsel for Amazon.com, Inc. in an IPR proceeding.
  • Atanas Baitchev

    • Role: Counsel in related IPR proceedings.
    • Firm: Perkins Coie LLP, San Diego, CA office.
    • Experience Note: Mr. Baitchev is listed as counsel for Amazon.com, Inc. in an IPR proceeding.
  • Charles Davis

    • Role: Corporate Counsel - IP Disputes (in-house).
    • Firm: Amazon.com, Inc.
    • Experience Note: Mr. Davis has the authority to execute documents on behalf of Amazon.com, Inc. in IPR proceedings, indicating his role in overseeing Amazon's intellectual property disputes from an in-house perspective. Amazon employs a team of in-house legal professionals for intellectual property, litigation, and various other legal needs.