Defendant
5 cases as defendant.
Hyundai Motor America (HMA) is the United States-based sales, marketing, and distribution subsidiary of South Korea's Hyundai Motor Company. Established in 1986, the company is headquartered in Fountain Valley, California. As a private subsidiary, specific revenue figures are not consistently reported, though its parent company is a major global automaker. HMA oversees significant U.S. operations, including a large manufacturing plant in Montgomery, Alabama, R&D facilities, and a design center.
Hyundai Motor America is an operating company responsible for selling a wide range of vehicles through more than 830 dealerships across the U.S. Its product lineup includes sedans, SUVs, and a growing portfolio of hybrid and all-electric vehicles. The company's U.S. presence extends beyond sales to include vehicle manufacturing, research and development, and financing services through Hyundai Motor Finance.
The company’s patent litigation posture appears to be that of an operating company defending its technology against patent assertions. The provided case data shows a balance of one offensive and one defensive case. This defensive posture is highlighted by its recent cases against entities characterized as non-practicing entities (NPEs). For instance, Hyundai is a defendant in a suit brought by AutoConnect Holdings LLC, an entity identified as an NPE by Unified Patents, in the plaintiff-friendly U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
In a proactive defensive measure, Hyundai has also acted as a plaintiff before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in a case against Optimum Vector Dynamics LLC. This type of action, typically an inter partes review, is common for operating companies seeking to invalidate patents being asserted against them. Like AutoConnect, Optimum Vector Dynamics is described in industry reports as an NPE. This pattern suggests Hyundai actively uses PTAB proceedings to challenge patent assertions from NPEs.
Proxense sued Hyundai and Kia entities, asserting the '960 patent as a lead patent along with U.S. Patents 9,251,332; 9,450,956; and 11,095,640. The case is active/pending.
This case is currently active and pending.
ATI sued Delphi and multiple automotive OEMs/suppliers in E.D. Mich. asserting the '516 patent along with U.S. Patents 6,484,080, 7,243,945, and 7,407,029. On March 9, 2011, the court granted summary judgment of invalidity on all four patents, including '516 as anticipated by Blackburn '243; the case was consolidated with 2:10-cv-10647 and appealed.
ATI asserted the '824 patent and related patents against Siemens VDO and other automotive defendants. The court granted summary judgment of invalidity of the '824 patent and denied defendants' later motion for attorney fees.
ATI sued Hyundai, BMW of North America, and Kia in the District of Delaware asserting multiple patents including US 6,757,602. The court denied a motion to transfer to E.D. Mich.; BMW claims were dismissed with prejudice in 2013 and Hyundai/Kia claims with prejudice in 2017.