Defendant

Kia Motors America, Inc.

3 cases as defendant.

Cases
3
Active
0
3 closed
Filed
2006–2014
Top venue
D. Delaware
1 case

Company profile

Kia Motors America, Inc. — operating company (automaker subsidiary)

Overview. Kia Motors America, Inc., now doing business as Kia America, Inc., is headquartered at 111 Peters Canyon Road, Irvine, California. It is the wholly owned U.S. sales, marketing and distribution subsidiary of Kia Corporation (KRX: 000270) of Seoul, South Korea, which in turn sits within the Hyundai Motor Group. Kia's parent filings list "Kia America, Inc. (KUS)" as established in October 1992; the entity was renamed Kia America, Inc. as part of Kia's 2021 global rebrand. Third-party headcount estimates for the U.S. entity vary widely (roughly a few hundred at the Irvine headquarters versus several thousand company-wide), and no reliable public revenue figure for the U.S. subsidiary alone is available.

Operations. Kia America imports, markets, distributes and services Kia-brand vehicles through a network of roughly 700–800 U.S. dealers, and handles regulatory compliance and warranty servicing. Its product line covers sedans (K4/Forte, K5), SUVs and crossovers (Sportage, Seltos, Sorento, Telluride), the Carnival minivan, and battery-electric models (EV6, EV9, Niro EV). Kia reported record U.S. sales of 796,488 units in 2024; assembly of some U.S.-market models takes place at Kia Georgia, Inc. in West Point, Georgia, a separate subsidiary.

Litigation posture. The database shows exactly one tracked case and zero as plaintiff — the profile of an operating company defending, not a patent assertion entity. Kia does not appear to assert patents offensively.

Notable case. The sole tracked matter is Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America et al., filed June 16, 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, in which Kia America was a defendant (and counterclaimant). ATI, a closely held New Jersey company led by engineer David Breed, asserted airbag and occupant-sensing patents against numerous automakers and suppliers; related ATI litigation proceeded in the Eastern District of Michigan and the Federal Circuit affirmed invalidity of ATI's '253 side-impact sensor patent for lack of enablement in 2007. ATI's portfolio was later associated with American Vehicular Sciences. No merits conclusions are drawn here.

Filing activity

2006: 2 cases2'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'132014: 1 case'14
Cases filed per year naming Kia Motors America, Inc. as defendant.

Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hyundai Motor Group et al.

terminated
Docket:
2:14-cv-00201-JRG
Filed:
2014-03-10

IDT asserted the '563 Patent and U.S. 6,886,956 (and Display Patents) against Hyundai/Kia entities. A claim construction order entered May 4, 2015 (Dkt. 244) construing '563/'956 and Display Patents; the case was terminated. Nissan and Stanley Electric later appeared via third-party complaints.

Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp. et al.

judgment
Docket:
2:06-cv-15756
Filed:
2006-12-27

ATI asserted the '824 patent and related patents against Siemens VDO and other automotive defendants. The court granted summary judgment of invalidity of the '824 patent and denied defendants' later motion for attorney fees.

Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America et al.

dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
1:06-cv-00391-GMS
Filed:
2006-06-16
Terminated:
2017-05-18

ATI sued Hyundai, BMW of North America, and Kia in the District of Delaware asserting multiple patents including US 6,757,602. The court denied a motion to transfer to E.D. Mich.; BMW claims were dismissed with prejudice in 2013 and Hyundai/Kia claims with prejudice in 2017.