Defendant

TK Electronics, Inc.

1 case as defendant.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
2006
Top venue
E D Mich Southern Division Judge Robert H Cleland
1 case

Company profile

I'll research this company before writing the profile.

Let me verify the corporate identity of TK Electronics, particularly its relationship to Takata.

Let me confirm the post-2006 corporate history of Takata's US entities.

TK Electronics, Inc. was a U.S. subsidiary of Japan's Takata Corporation, the automotive safety-systems supplier. Takata's regulatory filings (有価証券報告書) record that TK Electronics Inc. was a Delaware corporation doing business in Michigan, and that on October 1, 2006 it was absorbed into TK Holdings Inc. — Takata's Americas holding company, based in Auburn Hills, Michigan (2500 Takata Drive) — along with Takata Seat Belts, Takata Restraint Systems, Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inflation Systems and Takata Petri. TK Electronics therefore ceased to exist as a separate operating entity shortly before the litigation below was filed. Standalone headcount or revenue for TK Electronics is not verifiable in public sources; Takata group-level figures apply to the parent, not this unit.

Operations. As part of the Takata group, the entity sat within a business that developed and manufactured automotive occupant-safety hardware: airbag systems and inflators, seat belts, steering wheels, trim, child restraints, and the electronics and sensors supporting them. TK Electronics' specific product line is not separately documented in public sources; I could not verify it. It was an operating subsidiary, not a shell or patent-holding vehicle.

Patent-litigation posture. The case data shows 0 cases as plaintiff and 1 as defendant: a pure operating-company defendant profile. The single tracked matter is Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp. et al., No. 2:06-cv-15756 (E.D. Mich., filed Dec. 27, 2006, Judge Robert H. Cleland), where TK Electronics was named alongside Siemens VDO, TRW Automotive, Nissan North America, Hyundai Motor America, Kia Motors America, Calsonic Kansei and TK Holdings. The plaintiff, ATI, is an individual-inventor-started patent asserter (David Breed) that litigated broadly against automakers and suppliers. Venue was the District of Michigan — the defendants' home forum — not a plaintiff-friendly venue like E.D. Tex.

Context. ATI asserted side-impact sensor patents ('379, '038, '202, '201) and a vehicular-component control patent ('824) against side airbag and sensor products. A related ATI assertion of U.S. 5,231,253 was held invalid for lack of enablement, affirmed by the Federal Circuit (2007); the E.D. Mich. case was appealed to the Sixth Circuit (No. 10-2431). TK Electronics' successor, TK Holdings, filed Chapter 11 in Delaware in June 2017; Takata's operations were acquired for ~$1.6 billion by Key Safety Systems (Ningbo Joyson Electronic) in April 2018 and renamed Joyson Safety Systems.

Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp. et al.

judgment
Docket:
2:06-cv-15756
Filed:
2006-12-27

ATI asserted the '824 patent and related patents against Siemens VDO and other automotive defendants. The court granted summary judgment of invalidity of the '824 patent and denied defendants' later motion for attorney fees.