Invalidity dossier
US 6696314
CMOS imager and method of formation
Current assignee: Aptina Imaging Corp
Added 8/26/2026, 6:49:52 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash
Auto-generating section 1 of 7: Litigation summary…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Based on the authoritative patent text provided and the available search results, here is my summary. Note: my searches did not return any CAFC 2026 docket entry or active litigation referencing this patent number; the only direct hit was the Google Patents record (mirroring the text you provided) and USPTO PTACTS petition documents where the number appears incidentally in search histories for other matters, not as a litigated patent.
US Patent 6,696,314 B2 — Summary
Title: CMOS imager and method of formation
Patent/Publication No.: US6696314B2 (application No. 10/404,147; pre-grant publication US20030176009A1, published 2003-09-18)
Inventor: Howard E. Rhodes
Original Assignee: Micron Technology, Inc.
Current Assignee (as listed by Google Patents): Aptina Imaging Corporation (assignment from Micron to Aptina recorded 2016-12-06, effective 2008-09-26; inventor-to-Micron assignment recorded 2016-11-09, effective 2001-08-28)
Filing Date: April 2, 2003 (divisional of U.S. Application 10/073,136, filed Feb. 13, 2002, which is a divisional of U.S. Application 09/941,556, filed Aug. 30, 2001, now US 6,504,196 B1)
Priority Date: August 30, 2001
Issue Date: February 24, 2004
Legal Status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration date listed as 2021-08-30; maintenance fees paid through year 12 in 2015)
Abstract: "A CMOS imager having an epitaxial layer formed below pixel sensor cells is disclosed. An epitaxial layer is formed between a semiconductor substrate and a photosensitive region to improve the cross-talk between pixel cells. The thickness of the epitaxial layer is optimized so that the collection of signal carriers by the photosensitive region is maximized."
Technology in brief: The patent addresses quantum-efficiency loss and cross-talk in CMOS imagers caused by photogenerated carriers diffusing out of the photosite into the substrate. The solution is to grow a doped epitaxial layer (typically p-type, about 10,000–150,000 Å, preferably ~60,000 Å) between the substrate and the pixel well. The increased dopant concentration at the epitaxial-layer/substrate interface creates an electric field that reflects signal carriers back toward the photosite. The layer thickness can be tailored by color wavelength (e.g., ~80,000 Å for red, ~10,000 Å for blue) to maximize collection and minimize cross-talk.
Plain-Language Overview of the Independent Claims
The patent has 25 claims; the independent claims are 1, 13, and 21 (all method claims).
Claim 1 – Method of forming a pixel cell. Covers forming a pixel cell by: (a) growing an epitaxial layer of a first conductivity type (e.g., p-type) over a substrate; (b) forming a retrograde well of the first conductivity type in that epitaxial layer (dopant concentration lowest at the surface, highest at the well bottom); (c) forming a photosensitive region in the well; (d) forming a photosensor (e.g., photogate) on the upper surface of the photosensitive region to control charge collection; and (e) forming a floating diffusion region of the opposite (second) conductivity type in the well to receive transferred charge.
Claim 13 – Method of forming a pixel array. Covers forming an array by: (a) forming an epitaxial layer of a first conductivity type over a substrate; (b) forming a well of the first conductivity type in the epitaxial layer; and (c) forming a plurality of pixel sensor cells in the well, where each cell has a photosensitive region, a photosensor on it for sensing charges of a particular color wavelength, and a floating diffusion region of a second conductivity type. This is the array-level analog of claim 1, with a color-wavelength-specific photosensor per cell.
Claim 21 – Method of forming a color pixel cell. Covers forming a color pixel cell by: (a) forming at least three epitaxial layers of a first conductivity type in a substrate, where the layers have different thicknesses from one another; (b) forming a photosensitive region in each of the epitaxial layers; (c) forming a photosensor on each photosensitive region for receiving charges of a particular color wavelength; and (d) forming a floating diffusion region of the second conductivity type in each layer. The differently-thick epitaxial layers are tuned to different wavelengths (red/green/blue), each with its own reflective barrier and readout node.
Dependent-claim highlights: Claims 2–6 and 15–19 specify thermal growth at ~900–1200° C and thickness ranges (10,000–150,000 Å; preferably 30,000–100,000 Å; most preferably ~60,000 Å). Claims 7–8, 14, 22–23 specify p-type/n-type conductivity combinations. Claims 9 and 20 specify ion implantation for the well. Claims 10–11 and 24 add a transfer gate (photogate embodiment). Claims 12 and 25 add a reset transistor whose source is the floating diffusion region.
Uncertainty Notes
- CAFC 2026 docket: I found no evidence of a 2026 Federal Circuit appeal or any active litigation involving US 6,696,314. The patent is shown as expired (term ended ~2021), so post-expiry litigation is unlikely. If you need definitive confirmation, the USPTO's Patent Center / PTAB and CAFC PACER docket searches would be the authoritative sources.
- Assignee: Google Patents' "current assignee" field (Aptina Imaging Corp) is flagged as potentially inaccurate; the recorded assignments confirm Micron → Aptina.
Generated 8/26/2026, 6:50:17 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6696314. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.
Keep exploring
Other patents in Semiconductor (T)
- US 8489837US Patent 8,489,837 — Concise Summary Search caveat: I ran live web searches against Google Patents, FreePatentsOnline, Docket Alarm, CourtListener, CAFC docket feeds, and PTAB records. I could not directly query USPTO Patent Center/PAIR…
- US 8689064Search notes (performed) - I searched for USPTO/Patent Center records for 8,689,064 / US8689064 and for CAFC 2026 docket entries tied to that exact patent number. The USPTO-site-restricted search returned no usable results, so I relied on…
- US 8359501Summary of U.S. Patent 8,359,501 (US8359501B1) I ran web searches for the specific patent number 8359501 (and its US 8,359,501 B1 publication). No results for a CAFC 2026 docket specific to this patent surfaced — the CAFC appeals I found…
- US 8516185Summary — U.S. Patent 8,516,185 B2 ("8516185") Search scope note: I searched for patent number 8516185 only (not similar numbers). The USPTO/Google Patents record and litigation databases were consulted. No CAFC 2026 docket specifically…
- US 8001434US Patent 8,001,434 B1 — Search Results & Summary Verification notes on searches I searched the USPTO-derived databases (uspto.report, FreePatentsOnline, Google Patents, Unified Patents) and the CAFC/PTAB/ITC litigation record for patent…
- US 9619864Let me also search for any CAFC docket activity involving this patent number, as requested. Summary — U.S. Patent No. 9,619,864 (US9619864B2) Bibliographic data | Field | Value | |---|---| | Title | Image processing apparatus and method…
- US 8756364Summary of U.S. Patent 8,756,364 B1 (US8756364B1) Note: I interpret the identifier literally as patent number 8,756,364 (publication US8756364B1, application 13/287,042). I did not find any record for a differently-numbered patent that…
- US 10805562I'll search for information about US patent 10805562, including any CAFC 2026 docket activity. Both searches returned no results. Let me try alternate query formulations. The initial searches found no direct hits. Let me run more targeted…