Invalidity dossier

US 5409134

Pressure-sensitive accumulator for ink-jet pens

Current assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company

Added 9/17/2026, 12:47:55 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Hewlett-Packard Company

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US 5,409,134 A — "Pressure-sensitive accumulator for ink-jet pens"

Bibliographic data (as supplied). Application US07/805,438; filed 1991-12-11; granted and published 1995-04-25. Priority date listed as 1990-01-12. Original assignee: Hewlett-Packard Co.; current assignee listed as HP Inc. Inventors: Bruce Cowger, Marc A. Baldwin, Fred E. Tarver, Gary D. Tarver, John G. Wydronek, George M. Custer. Status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2012-04-25). Classifications place it in B41J 2/17503 (ink cartridges) and B41J 2/17556 (means for regulating pressure in the cartridge). Listed prior-art keywords: bag, spring, reservoir, spring member, accumulator.

Purpose and plain-language scope. The title and classifications indicate a pressure-sensitive accumulator for ink-jet pens — a mechanism for regulating pressure in an ink cartridge. The supplied text's definitions section begins: "This invention pertains to mechanisms for r..." (truncated). Beyond that, the excerpt does not include the abstract, the claims, or the written description, so the specific structure, operation, and scope of the invention cannot be stated from the supplied material. Anyone needing the actual claimed scope should consult the full specification and claims at the source.

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not supply any claim language or independent/dependent claim structure; no abstract; no detailed description of the bag, spring, or reservoir elements; no drawings content; no named prior-art references; and no legal conclusions. Also note the source itself cautions that legal status, assignee accuracy, and priority date are assumptions and not legal conclusions.

Omitted from this overview by instruction: litigation data (e.g., the referenced ITC case 337-TA-446) and ownership/assignment events, which appear in the source but are outside the requested scope.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5409134/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:21 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5409134. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Hewlett-Packard Company

This patent in court (1)

1 tracked lawsuit name US 5409134.