Plaintiff

Hewlett-Packard Company

6 cases as plaintiff.

Cases
6
Active
1
5 closed
Filed
2000–2016
Top venue
ITC
2 cases
Also appears as a defendant in 6 cases → View as defendant

Company profile

Hewlett-Packard Company (1939–2015)

Hewlett-Packard Company was a multinational information technology corporation founded in 1939 by Bill Hewlett and David Packard in a Palo Alto, California garage. Prior to its separation, the company was a global leader in a wide variety of hardware and software. In a landmark corporate split on November 1, 2015, the original Hewlett-Packard Company was divided into two distinct, publicly traded entities: HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE). The former Hewlett-Packard Company was renamed HP Inc., which is its legal successor, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise was spun off as a new company.

Before the 2015 split, Hewlett-Packard's extensive product lines included personal computers, printers, enterprise servers, data storage devices, networking equipment, and IT services. Following the separation, HP Inc. (NYSE: HPQ) retained the personal computer and printer businesses and is headquartered in Palo Alto, California. Hewlett Packard Enterprise (NYSE: HPE), now headquartered in Spring, Texas, focuses on enterprise products and services, including servers, storage, networking, cloud solutions, and IT consulting.

As a major technology hardware and services provider, the historic Hewlett-Packard Company was an operating company frequently targeted in patent disputes. The provided data shows the company as a defendant in the single tracked case from 2013, consistent with the typical litigation posture of a large-scale technology manufacturer defending against patent assertions. This case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, a venue historically popular with patent plaintiffs.

The 2015 corporate separation is the most significant event in the company's recent history, effectively creating two more focused Fortune 100 companies from the original entity. The tracked litigation, Sampo IP, LLC v. ETrade Financial Corporate Services Inc. et al.*, occurred before this split and named the unified Hewlett-Packard Company as a defendant. Any liabilities from litigation pre-dating the split are now generally handled by HP Inc. as the legal successor.

Watchlist

Get alerted when Hewlett-Packard Company sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Hewlett-Packard Company files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

Filing activity

2000: 1 case'00'02'04'06'082010: 4 cases4'10'12'142016: 1 case'16
Cases filed per year with Hewlett-Packard Company as plaintiff.

SAP America, Inc. et al. v. Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO

claims cancelled / patent invalidated; affirmed on appeal
Docket:
IPR2016-00783
Filed:
2016-04-01
Terminated:
2017-09-28
Patents:6597812

PTAB inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,597,812 filed by SAP America, Sybase, HP entities, and Teradata Operations. Final Written Decision on September 28, 2017 held all challenged claims unpatentable; affirmed by Federal Circuit in Realtime Data, LLC v. Iancu, No. 18-1154.

Hewlett-Packard Company et al. v. MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

Violation found; general exclusion order issued; investigation terminated
Docket:
337-TA-723
Filed:
2010-05-25
Terminated:
2011-10-24

HP filed a Section 337 complaint against makers and sellers of HP-compatible inkjet cartridges and printheads. The ALJ found MicroJet and PTC directly infringed and APM contributorily infringed; the Commission affirmed the violation, found APM induced infringement, and issued a general exclusion order.

Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. et al. v. MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

Filed; outcome unverified
Docket:
3:10-cv-02175
Filed:
2010-05-20
Patents:6481817

District-court counterpart to the ITC action, also docketed as 5:10-cv-02175. The Stanford NPE Litigation Database lists this case as involving US 6,481,817; a final judgment or termination order was not verified in the narrative.

Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. et al. v. MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

listed in NPE database; disposition not confirmed
Docket:
3:10-cv-02175
Filed:
2010-05-20
Patents:6402279

District court action listed in the Stanford NPE Litigation Database as involving the '279 patent. The narrative did not find a confirmed disposition.

Hewlett-Packard Company v. MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

Instituted; '817 inclusion probable but unverified
Docket:
337-TA-711
Filed:
2010-03-05

Earlier companion ITC Section 337 investigation naming HP as complainant and MicroJet, Mipo entities, Mextec, SinoTime, and PTC Holdings as respondents. The narrative states the '817 patent's inclusion is probable but not independently confirmed, while the 337-TA-723 opinion described 711 as accusing MicroJet of infringing the same patents.

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Microjet Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

terminated
Docket:
337-TA-446
Filed:
2000-12-22
Terminated:
2002-04-25

Hewlett-Packard filed a Section 337 complaint at the ITC against Microjet and several inkjet cartridge resellers, alleging infringement of six patents including US 4,635,073. The ALJ initially found no infringement of the '073 patent, but the Commission reversed in part, found claim 4 infringed, found a Section 337 violation, and issued a limited exclusion order against Microjet and cease-and-desist orders against Price-Less and ABCCo.net. The investigation was terminated in 2002.