Invalidity dossier

US 4992802

Method and apparatus for extending the environmental operating range of an ink jet print cartridge

Current assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company

Added 9/17/2026, 12:47:54 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Hewlett-Packard Company

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 4,992,802 A

Title: Method and apparatus for extending the environmental operating range of an ink jet print cartridge

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4992802/en

Bibliographic data (from excerpt): Application US07/289,876; inventors John H. Dion and Thomas H. Winslow; original assignee Hewlett-Packard Company (current assignee listed as HP Inc); priority/filing date 1988-12-22; publication/grant date 1991-02-12; status listed as expired — lifetime. Foreign counterparts noted in the excerpt include EP0375383B1, CA1323243C, JP2957617B2, and KR0141518B1.

Purpose: The invention addresses the problem of maintaining proper "underpressure" (sub-ambient reservoir pressure) in drop-on-demand ink jet print heads. If underpressure is too small or positive, ink escapes through the drop generators; if too large, air can be drawn in through them. The stated aim is to extend the environmental operating range of an ink jet print cartridge while permitting a volumetrically efficient package.

Plain-language scope: An ink jet print cartridge has an ink reservoir plus two pressure-control mechanisms that cooperate to hold reservoir underpressure at a desired value. The first mechanism limits underpressure by controllably introducing replacement fluid (air or ink) — e.g., a "bubble generator orifice" sized to admit air at a chosen underpressure (five inches of water in the illustrated embodiment). The second limits underpressure by changing reservoir volume — e.g., a collapsible flexible bladder in a wall of a rigid, fixed-volume chamber. The orifice is made larger than the print nozzle orifices (0.0078 in. vs. 0.0020 in.) so ink preferentially exits the orifice under overpressure. A catchbasin receiving the orifice is vented to atmosphere.

Not established by this excerpt: The full claim set, dependent-claim scope, the complete description and drawings (only partially quoted), and the specific figures referenced (e.g., FIG. 6). The prosecution history, any prior-art rejections, and the excerpt's note of an International Trade Commission proceeding are not described. No assessment of validity, enforceability, or claim coverage is offered or supported by the supplied text.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:22 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4992802. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Hewlett-Packard Company

This patent in court (1)

1 tracked lawsuit name US 4992802.