SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors

2 cases as defendant.

Cases

Active

2 closed

Filed

2010

Top venue

ITC

1 case

Hewlett-Packard Company et al. v. MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

Violation found; general exclusion order issued; investigation terminated

Docket:: 337-TA-723
Court:: U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.
Filed:: 2010-05-25
Terminated:: 2011-10-24

Patents:6481817 6234598 6309053 6398347 6402279 6412917

π Hewlett-Packard Company π Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Δ MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd.Δ Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc.Δ Mipo Technology Limited Δ Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd.Δ Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd.Δ SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors Δ PTC Holdings Limited

HP filed a Section 337 complaint against makers and sellers of HP-compatible inkjet cartridges and printheads. The ALJ found MicroJet and PTC directly infringed and APM contributorily infringed; the Commission affirmed the violation, found APM induced infringement, and issued a general exclusion order.

Hewlett-Packard Company v. MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

Instituted; '817 inclusion probable but unverified

Docket:: 337-TA-711
Court:: U.S. International Trade Commission
Filed:: 2010-03-05

Patents:6481817 6234598 6309053 6398347 6402279 6412917

π Hewlett-Packard Company Δ MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd.Δ Mipo Technology Limited Δ Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd.Δ Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd.Δ SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors Δ PTC Holdings Limited

Earlier companion ITC Section 337 investigation naming HP as complainant and MicroJet, Mipo entities, Mextec, SinoTime, and PTC Holdings as respondents. The narrative states the '817 patent's inclusion is probable but not independently confirmed, while the 337-TA-723 opinion described 711 as accusing MicroJet of infringing the same patents.