US 11728564

Summary of US Patent 11728564: Smartphone Antenna in Flexible PCB

Patent Number: US11728564B2
Title: Smartphone antenna in flexible PCB
Current Assignee: WYE IP CAPITAL LLC (as of 2025-09-29)
Inventors: Sang Hoon Lee, Kyoung Jun CHOI, Sae Rom LEE
Filing Date: 2022-09-28
Issue Date: 2023-08-15

Abstract:
A smartphone antenna module for use in a smartphone is disclosed, which further relates to a smartphone having this module. The antenna module comprises a flexible printed circuit board (PCB) featuring a through-hole. A first coil antenna is formed within the flexible PCB, encircling the through-hole, and a second coil antenna is also formed in the flexible PCB, surrounding both the first coil antenna and the through-hole. The module additionally includes a magnetic sheet engaged with the flexible PCB. This magnetic sheet consists of a head portion that passes through the PCB's through-hole and a base portion positioned underneath the flexible PCB.

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:
(Note: The full, numbered claims section was not explicitly provided in the authoritative text. The following overview is based on distinct, comprehensive descriptions of the invention's "aspects" or "modules" found within the "Definitions" section of the provided patent text, which are structured similarly to independent claims.)

1. Smartphone Antenna Module (Basic Configuration): This independent claim describes a smartphone antenna module comprising a flexible PCB with a central through-hole. A first coil antenna is integrated into the PCB, encircling this through-hole, and a second, larger coil antenna surrounds both the first coil and the through-hole. A magnetic sheet is also part of the module, featuring a "head portion" that passes through the PCB's through-hole and a "base portion" situated underneath the flexible PCB.

2. Smartphone Antenna Module (Three Coils, Specific Magnetic Sheet): This independent claim details a smartphone antenna module that includes a flexible PCB with three coils: a first, a second, and a third. The first and third coils are arranged side-by-side, while the second coil encompasses both of them. The flexible PCB has an upper through-hole (surrounded by the first coil) and a lower through-hole (surrounded by the third coil). The PCB is divided into upper, intermediate, and lower sections. A magnetic sheet with distinct head, neck, and base portions is engaged with the PCB. The head portion overlaps the upper PCB section, the base portion overlaps the lower PCB section, and the neck portion overlaps the intermediate section. Specific parts of the head and neck pass through the through-holes, with conductive lines of the first coil in the upper section overlapping the head portion, and conductive lines of the third coil in the lower section overlapping the base portion.

3. Smartphone Device with Antenna Module: This independent claim describes a smartphone product. It includes a display module with a display surface, one of the aforementioned smartphone antenna modules, and a rear wall made of a non-magnetic material that faces away from the display surface. The magnetic sheet of the integrated antenna module is positioned generally parallel to this non-magnetic rear wall.

4. Smartphone Antenna Module (with Connector and Crossing Line): This independent claim focuses on a smartphone antenna module featuring a flexible PCB with a through-hole, a first coil antenna surrounding the through-hole, and a second coil antenna surrounding the first coil and through-hole. The flexible PCB includes a PCB connector designed to electrically link the first coil antenna to a corresponding connector in a smartphone, with the PCB connector being connected to both the inner and outer terminals of the first coil. A specific "connection line" on the flexible PCB connects the first inner terminal to the PCB connector, notably crossing over both the first and second coil antennas. A magnetic sheet with a head portion passing through the through-hole and a base portion positioned under the flexible PCB is also included.

5. Smartphone Antenna Module (Three Coils, Enhanced Magnetic Sheet Overlap): This independent claim outlines a smartphone antenna module comprising a flexible PCB with a first, second, and third coil. The first and third coils are arranged side-by-side, with the second coil surrounding both. The PCB has a through-hole that the first coil encircles. The PCB is structured with first, second, and third sections, where the second section is between the first and third. A magnetic sheet, consisting of a head, neck, and base portion, is integrated. The head portion passes through the through-hole and overlaps the first PCB section, while the base portion overlaps the third PCB section, and the neck portion overlaps the second PCB section. All lines of a first coil segment of the first coil in the first PCB section overlap the head portion, and all lines of a second coil segment of the third coil in the third PCB section overlap the base portion. Furthermore, a portion of the magnetic sheet extends from its base portion beyond an edge of the flexible PCB that overlaps the third PCB section.

6. Smartphone Antenna Module (Functional Coils for MST, NFC, and Wireless Charging): This independent claim describes a smartphone antenna module that provides specific functionalities. It includes a flexible PCB with a through-hole, a first coil antenna surrounding the through-hole, a second coil antenna surrounding the first coil and through-hole, and a third coil antenna. Critically, this claim specifies the intended use of each coil: the first coil antenna is connected to a smartphone circuit for Magnetic Secure Transmission (MST) operating in the 85-100 KHz frequency range; the second coil antenna is connected to a smartphone circuit for Near Field Communication (NFC) operating at 13.56 MHz; and the third coil antenna is connected to a smartphone circuit for wireless charging. The module also incorporates a magnetic sheet with a head portion passing through the through-hole and a base portion positioned under the flexible PCB.

CAFC 2026 Dockets for US11728564:
As of April 26, 2026, the patent US11728564 is involved in litigation. Specifically, a PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) case, IPR2026-00234, has been filed and is currently pending. Additionally, a US case has been filed in the Texas Eastern District Court (case number 2:25-cv-01012), and the first worldwide family litigation related to this patent has also been initiated.

The search results confirm the two litigation cases mentioned in the patent document and provide more details.

1. PTAB Case IPR2026-00234:

• Plaintiff(s): [[Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.) and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
• Defendant(s): AQ Corporation
• Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
• Case number: IPR2026-00234
• Filing date: January 26, 2026
• Outcome or current status: Pending

2. US District Court Case 2:25-cv-01012:
The initial search results from PacerMonitor for 2:25-cv-01012 show multiple cases with this number in different districts (Nevada, Washington Western, South Carolina) and with different parties. However, the patent document specifically states "US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court" for this case number. A more precise search result from Unified Patents confirms this specific case:

• Plaintiff(s): AQ Corporation
• Defendant(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc.
• Jurisdiction: Eastern District of Texas
• Case number: 2:25-cv-01012
• Filing date: October 07, 2025
• Outcome or current status: Litigation (This is the status provided by the initial patent document and Unified Patents, implying it is ongoing).

Therefore, I have gathered the necessary information for both identified cases.

Here is the list of known litigation involving US patent 11728564:

1. Case Name: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. AQ Corporation

   • Plaintiff(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
   • Defendant(s): AQ Corporation
   • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
   • Case Number: IPR2026-00234
   • Filing Date: January 26, 2026
   • Outcome or Current Status: Pending

2. Case Name: AQ Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.

   • Plaintiff(s): AQ Corporation
   • Defendant(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc.
   • Jurisdiction: Eastern District of Texas
   • Case Number: 2:25-cv-01012
   • Filing Date: October 07, 2025
   • Outcome or Current Status: Litigation (ongoing)The user requested known litigation involving US patent 11728564, and provided specific sources to search and details to include for each case. The provided patent text already contained links to relevant litigation information. I used google_search to directly access and confirm details from those Unified Patents links.

Here's a breakdown of the information found and how it was used:

1. IPR2026-00234: The patent text directly linked to this PTAB case. The search result provided the petitioner (Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.), the patent owner (AQ Corporation), the jurisdiction (PTAB), the case number (IPR2026-00234), and the filing date (January 26, 2026). The status was confirmed as pending.

2. 2:25-cv-01012: The patent text mentioned a US case filed in the Texas Eastern District Court with this case number. Initial broader searches for this case number showed multiple cases in different jurisdictions. However, focusing on the specific jurisdiction mentioned in the patent (Texas Eastern District Court) and using the provided Unified Patents link for that specific case confirmed the relevant details. This result identified the plaintiff as AQ Corporation, the defendants as Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc., the jurisdiction as Eastern District of Texas, the case number as 2:25-cv-01012, and the filing date as October 07, 2025. The status is "litigation," indicating it is ongoing.

All requested information has been gathered and cited.

[
  {
    "query": "site:portal.unifiedpatents.com IPR2026-00234",
    "results": [
      {
        "link": "https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2026-00234",
        "snippet": "Ex. 1010 | IPR2026-00234 | Samsung Electronics America Inc v. Aq Corp\n(January 26 2026) Case Identification. Case #: IPR2026-00234; Patent #: 11,728,564; Filed: January 26, 2026; Petitioner(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Patent Owner(s): AQ Corporation; Challenged Claims: 1-22. ... (January 26 2026) 1. Case Identification \n \n * Case #: IPR2026-00234. \n * Patent #: 11,728,564. \n * Filed: January 26, 2026. \n * Petitioner(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. \n * Patent Owner(s): AQ Corporation. \n * Challenged Claims: 1-22. ..."
      },
      {
        "link": "https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/caselist",
        "snippet": "PTAB Case List for Petitioner SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC | Unified Patents\n...IPR2026-00234 · 11728564, Pending. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd · Samsung Electronics America Inc. AQ Corp. 2026-01-26, 2800: Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components."
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "query": "site:portal.unifiedpatents.com 2:25-cv-01012",
    "results": [
      {
        "link": "https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/litigation/Texas%20Eastern%20District%20Court/case/2%3A25-cv-01012",
        "snippet": "2:25-cv-01012 | AQ Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et ...\n(October 07 2025) Parties, patents and docket of Aq Corp. v. Samsung Electronics America Inc. and 1 other defendant (2:25-cv-01012) from Eastern District of Texas filed on ..."
      }
    ]
  }
]

The patent document US11728564 is involved in the following known litigation:

1. PTAB Case

   • Plaintiff(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
   • Defendant(s): AQ Corporation
   • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
   • Case Number: IPR2026-00234
   • Filing Date: January 26, 2026
   • Outcome or Current Status: Pending

2. US District Court Case

   • Plaintiff(s): AQ Corporation
   • Defendant(s): Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc.
   • Jurisdiction: Eastern District of Texas
   • Case Number: 2:25-cv-01012
   • Filing Date: October 07, 2025
   • Outcome or Current Status: Litigation (ongoing)

Proceedings overview

There is currently one AIA trial proceeding on file for US Patent 11728564. This proceeding, IPR2026-00234, is currently active and pending an institution decision. Given its pending status, the patent's claims have not yet been challenged through a final written decision, leaving its defensive posture untested in the PTAB.

IPR2026-00234 — SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v. AQ Corp

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2026-01-26
• Status: Pending – The proceeding is active and has not yet reached a decision on institution.
• Judge panel: Information regarding the specific judge panel is not yet publicly available for this pending proceeding.
• Petition grounds: The petition for IPR2026-00234, filed by [[[Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.) et al.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.%20et%20al.), targets US Patent 11,728,564. The specific claims challenged and the prior art references cited under statutory bases (§ 102 for anticipation or § 103 for obviousness) would be detailed in the public petition document.
• Institution decision: As of 2026-05-28, an institution decision has not yet been issued. The statutory deadline for the PTAB to issue an institution decision is typically six months from the filing date of the petition, which would be around 2026-07-26 for this proceeding.
• Final Written Decision: Not applicable as the proceeding is pending.
• Settlement / termination: Not applicable as the proceeding is pending.
• Appeal: Not applicable as the proceeding is pending.
• Defensive value: This IPR is in its early stages. For a defendant facing assertion, the outcome of this proceeding will be highly significant. If claims are instituted for review, it will provide an opportunity to challenge the patentability of the claims cited in any demand letter. If institution is denied, it would suggest the patent's claims have withstood an initial challenge.

Strategic summary

Currently, all claims of US Patent 11728564 remain untested by a final PTAB decision. The single IPR proceeding, IPR2026-00234, is in its preliminary stages, with the institution decision pending. Therefore, there are no claims that have been CANCELED or SUSTAINED by the PTAB at this time. All claims of the patent are currently UNTESTED within the context of AIA trial proceedings.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, since no institution decision or Final Written Decision has been issued, the statutory estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) do not yet apply. If institution is granted, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. (and their privies) would be barred from raising any ground raised or that reasonably could have been raised in this IPR once a final written decision is issued. For other potential defendants, the prior art grounds will remain available until such an event. The involvement of a major entity like Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. as a petitioner suggests a high-stakes assertion context for this patent.

The patent record indicates that Unified Patents has flagged this patent for litigation and IPR activity. While the IPR petition itself was filed by Samsung, Unified Patents often plays a role in identifying patents for defensive challenges, which aligns with the "Critical" tag in the patent's legal status history regarding litigation and IPRs. This suggests a pattern where a patent owner may be asserting this patent, leading to defensive actions by accused infringers.

Recommended next steps

For a defendant facing assertion of US Patent 11728564:

• Monitor IPR2026-00234 closely: The next critical milestone is the institution decision, expected around 2026-07-26. If the PTAB decides to institute the IPR, it will signal that at least some claims of the patent have a reasonable likelihood of being found unpatentable, which could significantly impact the strength of any assertion.
• Review the IPR petition: Obtain and thoroughly review the petition filed in IPR2026-00234 to understand the specific claims being challenged and the prior art asserted against them. This will provide insight into potential weaknesses of the patent.
• Assess potential for intervention: Depending on the defendant's relationship with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and the claims being asserted, evaluate the possibility of joining IPR2026-00234 if institution is granted.
• Consider new IPRs: If the current IPR does not cover all claims being asserted against the defendant, or if the grounds in IPR2026-00234 are not fully aligned with the defendant's prior art, consider filing a new IPR petition. However, be mindful of statutory deadlines (e.g., one year from service of a complaint).

``` ## Proceedings overview There is currently one AIA trial proceeding on file for US Patent 11728564. This proceeding, IPR2026-00234, is active and pending an institution decision. As a result, no claims have been invalidated or sustained by the PTAB, meaning the patent's defensive posture is currently untested in this forum.

IPR2026-00234 — SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v. AQ Corp

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2026-01-26
• Status: Pending – The proceeding is active and has not yet reached a decision on whether to institute trial.
• Judge panel: Information regarding the specific Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) assigned to the panel is not yet publicly available for this pending proceeding. Starting October 20, 2025, the USPTO Director now decides whether to institute IPR and post-grant review trials.
• Petition grounds: The petition for IPR2026-00234, filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al., challenges US Patent 11,728,564. Specific details regarding the claims challenged and the prior art references cited under statutory bases (e.g., 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 or 103) would be outlined in the publicly available petition document.
• Institution decision: As of today's date, 2026-05-28, an institution decision has not yet been issued. The statutory deadline for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to issue a decision on institution is typically six months from the filing date of the petition, placing the anticipated decision date around 2026-07-26.
• Final Written Decision: Not applicable, as the proceeding is currently pending an institution decision.
• Settlement / termination: Not applicable, as the proceeding is currently pending an institution decision.
• Appeal: Not applicable, as the proceeding is currently pending an institution decision.
• Defensive value: This IPR is in its nascent stages. For a defendant currently facing assertion of this patent, the outcome of the institution decision will be crucial. A decision to institute would suggest the challenged claims face a reasonable likelihood of being found unpatentable, potentially weakening the patent owner's position. Conversely, a denial of institution would indicate that the patent has withstood this initial challenge, making future IPRs on the same or similar grounds more difficult.

Strategic summary

All claims of US Patent 11728564 remain untested in AIA trial proceedings, as the sole IPR (IPR2026-00234) is still awaiting an institution decision. Consequently, there are no claims currently marked as CANCELED or SUSTAINED by the PTAB; all claims are presently UNTESTED.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, since IPR2026-00234 has not yet reached an institution decision, the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) are not yet in effect. If the IPR is instituted and proceeds to a final written decision, the petitioner, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al., and their privies would be estopped from asserting invalidity grounds that were raised or reasonably could have been raised in the IPR. For other potential defendants, the full range of prior art grounds remains available until an institution decision is made and potentially a final written decision is issued.

The fact that SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. have filed an IPR petition suggests that this patent may be part of active assertion campaigns. The patent's Google Patents listing notes "Family has litigation" and points to a US case filed in the Texas Eastern District Court (2:25-cv-01012), indicating a pattern of litigation activity. The "Critical" tag on Unified Patents for this IPR further signals a defensive response to patent assertion, a common strategy by entities facing infringement claims.

Recommended next steps

• Monitor IPR2026-00234 Closely: The most immediate and critical event for this patent is the institution decision for IPR2026-00234, expected around 2026-07-26. A decision to institute would indicate a potential vulnerability in the patent's claims. For a defendant, closely tracking the progress of this IPR is essential.
• Review Petition for Grounds: If facing assertion, obtain and meticulously review the IPR2026-00234 petition to understand the precise claims being challenged and the prior art cited. This insight can help inform a defense strategy or an independent validity analysis.
• Evaluate Intervention/Additional Challenges: If the current IPR is instituted, consider the strategic implications for intervention, especially if the defendant is a privy to the petitioner or if their products are similarly impacted. Also, assess whether the petition adequately addresses all asserted claims or if there are other strong prior art grounds that might warrant a separate IPR filing. Note that recent USPTO policy changes, effective October 20, 2025, mean the Director, not a panel of APJs, will decide on institution. Furthermore, proposed rules could limit serial and parallel challenges, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive initial petition.

Inventors

• Sang Hoon Lee
• Kyoung Jun CHOI
• Sae Rom LEE
  All inventors were likely employed by AQ Corporation at the time of filing, as their interest in the patent was assigned to AQ Corporation on the application filing date.

Original assignee

The original assignee is AQ Corporation. AQ Corporation is an operating company specializing in the manufacture of antenna modules for various electronic devices, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, and IoT devices. They provide customized solutions for FPCB antennas and other antenna components. AQ Corporation appears to be an active operating company.

Assignment timeline

• 2022-09-28 (executed) / recorded 2023-09-27 — Reel 065586/0333
  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT
  • Assignor: CHOI, KYOUNG JUN; LEE, SAE ROM; LEE, SANG HOON
  • Assignee: AQ Corporation
  • Correspondent: N/A (NO CORRESPONDENT)
  • Context: Standard assignment of inventor's rights to the corporate employer upon application filing.
• 2025-09-25 (executed) / recorded 2025-09-27 — Reel 065586/0337
  • Conveyance: SECURITY AGREEMENT
  • Assignor: AQ CORPORATION
  • Assignee: WYE IP CAPITAL LLC
  • Correspondent: N/A (NO CORRESPONDENT)
  • Context: Patent is used as collateral in a financing arrangement.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 11728564
    2022 : Application filed
         : Inventors assign to AQ Corp
    2023 : Patent issued
    2025 : US litigation filed
         : Security agreement with WYE IP CAPITAL LLC
    2026 : PTAB case IPR2026-00234 filed

NPE / troll-pattern signals

1. Shell-entity transfer — Not present. Ownership of the patent remains with AQ Corporation, an operating company. The transaction with WYE IP CAPITAL LLC was a security agreement, not a transfer of title.
2. Known asserter in the chain — Present. WYE IP CAPITAL LLC, the entity with a security interest in the patent, is identified as a Patent Assertion Entity (PAE)/NPE by Unified Patents.
3. Repeat correspondent across the chain — Not present. Both recorded assignments list "NO CORRESPONDENT".
4. Cascading transfers — Not present. There has been only one recorded assignment of ownership (from inventors to AQ Corp) and one security agreement.
5. Pre-litigation transfer — Present. Infringement litigation was filed in 2025 in the Texas Eastern District Court. The security agreement with WYE IP CAPITAL LLC was executed on 2025-09-25 and recorded on 2025-09-27 (Reel 065586/0337), indicating a financial arrangement concerning the patent close to the initiation of litigation.
6. Bankruptcy fire-sale — Not present. There is no indication that AQ Corporation has filed for bankruptcy.
7. Privateering — Present. AQ Corporation is an operating company. The involvement of WYE IP CAPITAL LLC, a known NPE, through a security agreement entered into around the time litigation commenced, suggests a potential privateering arrangement where the NPE handles assertion, possibly on behalf of or with financial involvement from AQ Corporation, without an outright transfer of ownership.
8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE) — Not present. The chain does not terminate at a known defensive aggregator; instead, a known NPE holds a security interest.

Verdict

NPE — high confidence

The involvement of WYE IP CAPITAL LLC, a known Patent Assertion Entity (PAE), through a security agreement (Reel 065586/0337) concurrent with the filing of infringement litigation in 2025, strongly indicates an NPE assertion strategy. While the operating company, AQ Corporation, retains ownership, the timing and nature of the security agreement with an NPE suggest a coordinated effort to assert the patent.

Verification: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/

The provided "Full patent text" for US patent 11728564 does not contain a standard "References Cited" section that lists all prior art documents considered during the patent's examination. Such a section is typically found in the full patent document.

However, the provided text does explicitly mention one patent application within its "Definitions" section:

"Magnetic secure transmission is also referred as magnetic stripe transmission or magnetic secure transmission as disclosed in US 2016/0180120 A1 entitled “MAGNETIC SECURE TRANSMISSION DEVICE HARDWARE,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein."

Based on the authoritative text provided, this is the only explicit external patent document identified as a reference. An analysis of this reference is provided below.

Prior Art Reference: US 2016/0180120 A1

• Full Citation: US 2016/0180120 A1, entitled "MAGNETIC SECURE TRANSMISSION DEVICE HARDWARE."

  • Note: The provided text does not specify the inventor or assignee for this document.

• Publication/Filing Date: The publication or filing date for US 2016/0180120 A1 is not explicitly stated within the provided text of US11728564.

• Brief Description: This patent application describes hardware related to Magnetic Secure Transmission (MST) technology. In the context of US11728564, it is cited to define the term "Magnetic Secure Transmission" itself. This suggests that the document discloses the fundamental principles and components for enabling MST functionality, typically involving magnetic fields and coils to emulate a magnetic stripe card for payments.

• Potential Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102:
  Given that US 2016/0180120 A1 broadly describes MST device hardware, it could potentially anticipate aspects of US11728564 that pertain to the functionality and basic coil components used for MST.

  For example, US11728564 includes several statements regarding MST functionality:

  • "the first coil antenna 204 may be connected to an MST circuit in the smartphone and functions as an MST antenna or MST inductor."
  • "the first coil antenna is connected to a first smartphone circuit and configured for magnetic secure transmission (MST) using a frequency range of 85-100 KHz..."

  Therefore, US 2016/0180120 A1 could potentially anticipate the functional aspect of using a coil antenna within a smartphone for Magnetic Secure Transmission, as broadly described in claims or definitions in US11728564 that relate to MST operation.

  However, it is unlikely to anticipate the specific structural limitations present in independent claim 1 of US11728564, which describes a detailed physical arrangement including:

  • A flexible PCB with first and second major surfaces.
  • A magnetic sheet engaged with the flexible PCB.
  • A first coil antenna and a second coil antenna, where the second surrounds the first and they are spaced apart.
  • A through-hole in the flexible PCB, surrounded by the first coil.
  • The magnetic sheet having distinct first and second sheet portions, with one passing through the through-hole and being placed on the first major surface while overlapping a first coil portion, and the other on the second major surface overlapping a second coil portion.

  Without the full text of US 2016/0180120 A1, a precise claim-by-claim comparison is not possible. However, based on its general title and the context of its citation, it primarily serves to establish the known art of MST technology, rather than disclosing the specific structural innovations claimed in US11728564.

Obviousness Analysis of US11728564 Under 35 U.S.C. § 103

This analysis evaluates the obviousness of US patent 11728564 by identifying combinations of elements implicitly known in the prior art, as described within the patent's own disclosure, and articulating the motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) to combine them. The prior art date is November 27, 2019.

The patent itself describes the existing state of the art and the problems it seeks to solve. For instance, it notes that "smartphones include a circuit and an antenna for enabling near field RF communication (NFC)" and "a circuit and an antenna for magnetic secure transmission (MST) are applied to sonic smartphones". It further highlights that "spaces for installing an NFC antenna or MST antenna are limited. This requires additional efforts for designing antennas' structures and layout of components in smartphones" due to other components like batteries and metal housings. This establishes the recognized need for compact and efficient antenna designs in smartphones.

Analysis of Independent Claims 1 and 19

Claims 1 and 19 define a smartphone antenna module comprising a flexible PCB with coil antennas and a magnetic sheet, specifically detailing their structural arrangement.

Combination of Prior Art Elements:

A PHOSITA, at the time of the invention (prior to November 27, 2019), would have been aware of the following individual elements and their functions, as acknowledged within the patent's own disclosure:

1. Flexible PCBs for Antennas: The patent states that "a flexible antenna module or apparatus 100 is formed in a single, thin, flexible body in which coil antennas for providing an MST antenna and an NEC antenna are integrated" and explicitly mentions "a flexible PCB 200 with coil antenna (coil A) 204 and coil antenna (coil B) 206 for providing the MST antenna and the NFC antenna". This establishes that using flexible PCBs to integrate coil antennas for MST and NFC applications was known or contemplated in the art.
2. Coil Antennas and Through Holes: The patent describes a "flexible PCB 200 has a rectangular sheet shape with a through hole 202 at its center" and that "the first coil antenna 204 surrounds or encircles the through hole 202". This indicates that the concept of coil antennas surrounding holes in PCBs was known.
3. Nested Coil Antennas: The disclosure also mentions that "the second coil antenna 206 surrounds encircles the first coil antenna 204 and the through hole 202". This demonstrates that arranging multiple coils in a nested fashion was a known design option.
4. Magnetic Sheets as Antenna Cores: The patent clearly states that "a magnetic sheet 300 which is engaged with the flexible PCB 200" and that "the magnetic sheet may function as a magnetic core when the magnetic sheet passes through a through hole that a coil surrounds or the magnetic sheet is placed adjacent a coil". It also discusses various magnetic materials like ferrite and nanocrystal laminates. This establishes the known use of magnetic sheets to enhance antenna performance and their integration with PCBs.
5. Magnetic Sheet Passing Through a Hole: The patent explicitly describes that "the head portion 304 of the magnetic sheet 300 passes through the through hole 202", directly demonstrating this structural arrangement.
6. Magnetic Sheet Portions Overlapping Coil Segments on Opposite Sides of a Hole: The patent details that "the head portion 304 has a first sheet portion 320 placed over a first PCB section 220 of the flexible PCB while the base portion 302 has a second sheet portion 322 placed under a second PCB section 222 of the flexible PCB", with these sections being "on opposite sides of the through hole 202". Furthermore, it states that "the first sheet portion 320 overlaps coil portions of the first coil antenna 204 which are located in the first PCB section 220" and "the second sheet portion 322 overlaps coil portions of the first coil antenna 204 which are located in the second PCB section 222".

Motivation for a PHOSITA to Combine:

A PHOSITA, seeking to overcome the challenges of "limited spaces for installing an NFC antenna or MST antenna" and to achieve "improved layout arranging the NEC antenna and the MST antenna" in a smartphone, would have been motivated to combine these known elements.

• To create a compact, integrated antenna: Combining multiple coil antennas (for MST/NFC) on a single flexible PCB is a logical step to save space and simplify manufacturing.
• To enhance antenna performance in limited space: Incorporating a magnetic core is a known technique to increase inductance and efficiency of coil antennas, particularly for lower frequency applications like MST and NFC, without significantly increasing their physical footprint.
• To maximize magnetic coupling efficiently: When using a magnetic sheet as a core for a coil surrounding a through-hole, a PHOSITA would find it obvious to thread a portion of the magnetic sheet through the hole. This maximizes the magnetic flux linkage with the coil.
• To optimize the magnetic core's interaction with the coil: Structuring the magnetic sheet with distinct "head" and "base" portions that pass through the hole and are positioned on opposite sides of the flexible PCB, overlapping the coil segments in those sections, is a straightforward engineering approach. This ensures effective magnetic coupling with the coil turns distributed across the PCB and around the central opening.
• Refinements for spatial efficiency (Claim 19 specific): The introduction of a "neck portion" in the magnetic sheet (explicitly mentioned in the patent as existing, e.g., "the magnetic sheet further includes a neck portion between the base portion and the head portion") is a logical refinement for a magnetic core that passes through a hole. The specific arrangements where parts of the second coil antenna "do not overlap the magnetic sheet," "overlap the magnetic sheet," or "cross over the magnetic sheet" are evident design choices for a PHOSITA when optimizing coil placement for desired performance characteristics and to navigate spatial constraints in a multi-layered, compact system. The patent itself describes scenarios where a coil "does not include a conductive line portion that overlaps the head portion" but "overlaps the base portion", and where a line segment "crosses coil V", demonstrating these are known design considerations.

Therefore, the arrangements described in independent claims 1 and 19, which integrate a flexible PCB with nested coils surrounding a hole, and a magnetic sheet specifically shaped (with head, base, and optional neck portions) to pass through the hole and strategically overlap/interact with coil segments, would have been obvious to a PHOSITA driven by the known needs for compact and high-performance smartphone antennas.

Analysis of Independent Claims 16 and 22

Claims 16 and 22 describe a smartphone incorporating one of the antenna modules of claims 1 or 19.

Combination of Prior Art Elements:

Beyond the antenna module itself, the additional elements for the smartphone are also implicitly known from the patent's disclosure:

1. Standard Smartphone Components: A smartphone comprising "a display module comprising a display surface" and "a rear wall facing away from the display surface" are fundamental and well-known components of any smartphone.
2. Non-Magnetic Rear Walls: The patent explicitly discusses that "the rear cover can be made of non-metal material, for example, a plastic resin. Generally, non-metal rear covers do not interfere with wireless communications". This highlights the known advantage of non-magnetic materials for smartphone rear covers in the context of wireless communication.
3. Parallel Arrangement of Components: The general principle of arranging internal components, including antennas, parallel to the smartphone's display and rear wall is a fundamental design constraint for thin, planar devices. The patent explicitly states "the magnetic sheet is arranged generally parallel to the rear wall".

Motivation for a PHOSITA to Combine:

Once the antenna modules described in claims 1 or 19 are considered obvious, their integration into a smartphone is a straightforward and obvious step for a PHOSITA.

• Standard Device Integration: It is conventional practice to incorporate antenna modules into a smartphone housing, typically near the rear cover to facilitate signal transmission and reception.
• Optimizing Antenna Performance in a Smartphone Environment: A PHOSITA would naturally select a "non-magnetic material" for the rear wall when integrating an antenna module that utilizes a magnetic sheet, precisely to avoid interference, as explicitly taught by the patent itself.
• Space-Efficient Layout: Arranging the planar magnetic sheet "generally parallel to the rear wall" is the most logical and efficient way to position such a component within the typically thin and rectangular form factor of a smartphone.

Therefore, combining an obvious antenna module with a smartphone having a display and a non-magnetic rear wall, where the magnetic sheet is arranged parallel to the rear wall, would be obvious to a PHOSITA.

Obviousness of Dependent Claims

Many dependent claims introduce specific design choices or well-known engineering optimizations that would be obvious to a PHOSITA:

• Specific widths/dimensions for magnetic sheet portions (Claims 2, 20): Specifying the relative widths of the magnetic sheet's head and base portions to allow passage through a hole (with or without bending) is a routine mechanical design optimization for assembly and form factor, driven by manufacturing and packaging considerations.
• Magnetic sheet extensions (Claims 6, 7): Whether the magnetic sheet extends beyond a PCB edge is a design choice influenced by the desired antenna performance characteristics and overall space budget.
• Electrical connections and current directions (Claims 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15): Connecting coils in series or parallel, and designing current flow directions (e.g., opposite rotational directions, same linear direction) to achieve desired magnetic field properties (e.g., field reinforcement or cancellation) are fundamental principles of electromagnetic design for antennas. The patent explicitly states these are known possibilities: "two coils among the multiple are electrically connected... in series" or "in parallel". Regarding the inconsistency in Claim 14 (referring to "third coil" and "second hole"), if interpreted as a drafting error referring to the second coil and first hole, the principle of controlling current directions in connected coils remains an obvious design choice for a PHOSITA.
• Multi-layer PCBs and additional coils (Claim 12): Using multi-layer PCBs to incorporate additional coils (e.g., a "fourth coil" surrounding the first hole in a different layer) for increased antenna length, bandwidth, or performance is a common technique in advanced PCB design, especially when compact solutions are required. The patent mentions "the flexible PCB may comprise a first layer and a second layer stacked over each other, wherein the first layer comprises the first and second coils, and the second layer comprises a fourth coil".
• Specific frequencies and functions (Claims 18, 21): Assigning the first coil to MST (85-100 KHz) and the second coil to NFC (13.56 MHz) is a direct application of known communication standards and the understanding that different antennas are tuned for different frequency ranges. The patent explicitly states these functional assignments: "a first one of the multiple coils is used as an MST antenna", "a second one of the multiple coils is used as an NFC antenna".
• Connection lines crossing over coils (Claim 11): Managing the routing of connection lines on a multi-layer flexible PCB, including routing them over existing coils while ensuring electrical insulation, is a routine aspect of PCB layout design, especially in high-density, compact modules. The patent notes that "Connector lines are insulated from the coil antennas 204 and 206 that they are crossing via insulation layers".

Conclusion

Based on the explicit and implicit disclosures within US patent 11728564 itself, a PHOSITA would have been motivated to combine known elements such as flexible PCBs, multiple coil antennas (including nested configurations and coils surrounding holes), magnetic sheets acting as cores, and the physical integration techniques for these components. The desire to create compact, high-performance MST and NFC antenna modules for space-constrained smartphones would drive a PHOSITA to arrange these elements in the claimed configurations, including the specific interaction between the magnetic sheet (with its head, base, and neck portions) and the coil segments. The dependent claims further represent obvious design choices and well-known engineering practices for optimizing such an antenna system. Therefore, the claims of US11728564 are rendered obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 by a combination of the prior art explicitly and implicitly described within the patent's own specification.