Plaintiff
201 cases as plaintiff.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. is a privately held Non-Practicing Entity (NPE) founded in British Columbia, Canada, in 2019. The company has disclosed that it has no parent company, and no publicly held corporation owns ten percent or more of its stock. While specific revenue or employee figures are not publicly available, it is recognized as a prolific entity in the patent enforcement market, having initiated hundreds of lawsuits.
As an NPE, Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. does not offer products or services but instead focuses on the acquisition and assertion of intellectual property rights. Its patent portfolio primarily consists of assets originally acquired from Intellectual Ventures LLC (IV) entities. These patents cover a diverse range of technologies, including image processing methods (such as those for panoramic images and virtual reality cameras), remote control functionalities, standard compression techniques like JPEG, playlist management for streaming media, and financial technology related to conditional offers in semi-anonymous trading systems.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. exhibits a clear patent-litigation posture as a patent assertion entity, consistently acting as a plaintiff in infringement lawsuits. The company's record, including the single plaintiff case in the Illinois Northern District Court tracked for this profile, aligns with this strategy. The company has pursued extensive litigation campaigns across various U.S. federal districts, with many cases resolved through voluntary dismissals, often indicating confidential settlements, rather than proceeding to trial.
Among its notable activities, Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. was sanctioned in 2020 by a judge in the Northern District of California for taking "objectively frivolous" positions and acting in bad faith. The company frequently asserts patents related to financial technology and trading systems. For instance, a case in the Illinois Northern District Court, Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. Horace Mann Educators Corporation, which involved U.S. Patent No. 8,577,782 B2 concerning conditional offer trading mechanisms, was dismissed with prejudice in January 2026, indicating a resolution between the parties. Other cases involving the same financial technology patent against Bank of America and LaSalle St. Securities also saw swift dismissals, often suggesting early, confidential settlements.
Watchlist
Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against LaSalle St. Securities, L.L.C. in N.D. Ill. asserting US 8,577,782, with a complaint and claim chart for the patent.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued David Lerner Associates, Inc. in E.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. It was dismissed on notice of settlement on 2026-03-31, with leave to reopen within 60 days.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Siebert Financial Corp. in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. The case was dismissed with prejudice, closed 2026-04-23.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Bank of America Corporation in E.D. Tex. asserting US 8,577,782. The case was dismissed with prejudice by joint stipulation and terminated 2026-03-12.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Safra Securities LLC in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. It was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, closed 2026-02-02.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued First Manhattan Securities LLC in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. Claims were dismissed with prejudice and counterclaims without prejudice via joint stipulation, closed 2025-12-30.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against Firstrade Securities Inc. in E.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. Defendant made a corporate disclosure on 2025-12-15.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Beech Hill Securities, Inc. in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. It was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on 2025-10-20.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Clear Street LLC in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. The claims were dismissed with prejudice and counterclaims without prejudice after 63 days.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against Corinthian Partners, L.L.C. in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782.
Complaint filed; summons issued.
Complaint filed; summons issued; Rabicoff Law appearing for plaintiff.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Hilltop Securities Inc in N.D. Tex. asserting US 8,577,782. The case was dismissed with prejudice by stipulation and closed 2025-06-12.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against FMR LLC in E.D. Tex. asserting US 8,577,782.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against The Charles Schwab Corporation in E.D. Tex. asserting US 8,577,782.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Cobra Trading, Inc. in E.D. Tex. asserting US 8,577,782. The complaint asserted Claim 1 of the patent.
Voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE 2024-04-17 under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i); each side bears own costs. No damages, no injunction, no claim construction.
Cedar Lane sued Amlogic Co. Ltd. in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Selex ES S.p.A. and Selex ES Inc. in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Vantage Robotics, Inc. in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Video Network Security LLC in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Videotec Security, Inc. in N.D.N.Y.; voluntary dismissal without prejudice was granted on 2023-01-31.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Lexmark International, Inc. in D. Del.; pending at last docket update.
Cedar Lane sued Lexmark International, Inc. in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Sixt Rent A Car, LLC in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal.
Cedar Lane sued Openeye US Inc. in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Openpath Security Inc. in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Xerox Corp. in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Closed 2023-02-09 (98 days) by Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) voluntary dismissal without prejudice.
Reported 'Pending – Other Pending' as of Dec. 2022.
Korean-defendant case from KIPO-published table; defendant anonymized as 'B', large corp.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Turing Video Inc. in D. Del.; IPWatchdog attributes US 6,473,527 to this case.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Video Network Security, LLC in D. Del.; pending at last docket update.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Autel Robotics USA LLC in D. Del.; IPWatchdog attributes US 6,473,527 to this case.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Adesso Incorporated in D. Del.; Cedar Lane's claims on US 6,473,527, US 6,972,790, and US 8,537,242 were dismissed with prejudice, while Adesso's counterclaims were dismissed without prejudice.
Cedar Lane sued Leica Camera, Inc. in D.N.J. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal (137 days); no merits ruling.
Cedar Lane sued Zicom Technology Inc. in D.N.J. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal without prejudice 2023-03-08 (138 days), pre-answer.
Cedar Lane sued Sensormatic Electronics, Inc. in D. Del. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal 2023-02-10 (134 days); notice text states with prejudice, each party bears own costs.
KIPO NPE report ties this D.N.J. Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. suit to US 6,473,527 and reports settlement on 2023-03-22; IPWatchdog separately lists this docket as Hanwha Techwin America and as asserting only US 6,972,790.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Grandstream Networks, Inc. in D. Del.; pending at last docket update.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued DivioTec Inc. in D. Del.; pending at last docket update.
KIPO NPE report lists this Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. W.D. Tex. suit against an anonymized Korean company as tied to US 6,473,527; reported settled 2022-07-08.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Adaptive Recognition America Corp. in D. Del.; voluntary dismissal was so ordered on 2022-05-06.
Cedar Lane sued Altice USA in the District of Delaware asserting US 8,165,867 and related patents listed in the AO-120 as 6,629,077 and 6,978,475. The case was voluntarily dismissed on 2022-06-21 and closed on 2022-06-22.
Cedar Lane sued Cox Communications in the District of Delaware asserting US 8,165,867 and US 6,978,475. The case was voluntarily dismissed on 2022-05-09.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued 3xlogic, Inc. in D. Del.; listed as Other Pending at last docket update.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Videology Imaging Solutions Inc. in D. Del.; defendant answered and counterclaimed, and the case was dismissed with prejudice by stipulation on 2022-03-16.
Korean-defendant case from KIPO-published table; defendant anonymized as 'C', SME.
Voluntary dismissal; terminated 2022-02-15.
Cedar Lane's Delaware suit against Lenovo listed multiple patents, including the '147 patent. The retrieved docket excerpts did not confirm the outcome.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Qualcomm Incorporated in W.D. Tex. (Waco; Judge Albright); US 6,473,527 is named in the complaint. Pending at last docket update.
Voluntary dismissal 2022-01-12; case terminated.
Cedar Lane sued GoPro in D. Del. on the '242 and related patents. Terminated 2021-10-12 on plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal.
Cedar Lane sued Philips Electronics North America in the District of Delaware asserting US 8,165,867. The court granted voluntary dismissal on 2021-09-07.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242, '790, and '867 against Reolink Digital Technology. The case reportedly settled 2021-08-09 for US$10,000 plus a perpetual worldwide license and covenant not to sue; suit withdrawn.
Cedar Lane sued Reolink Digital in W.D. Tex., Waco Division, asserting US 8,165,867 along with US 6,972,790 and US 8,537,242. The parties settled for US$10,000 on 2021-08-09 with a worldwide perpetual license; Cedar Lane withdrew the suit and moved to dismiss.
Voluntary dismissal; case terminated 2021-06-22.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242, inter alia, against HTC Corporation. Docket last retrieved 2021-06-16; no merits outcome located.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued HTC Corporation in W.D. Tex. asserting US 6,566,805 together with other portfolio patents. HTC was served on 2021-05-07, waived service on 2021-05-25, and the case was later terminated.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Azpen Innovation in E.D. Tex., asserting U.S. Patents 6,972,790; 8,537,242; 6,972,774; and 10,346,105. The case was voluntarily dismissed and terminated on April 13, 2021.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Xiaomi, Inc. in W.D. Tex. asserting US 6,566,805 together with other portfolio patents. A motion for alternative service was filed on 2021-02-08, and the case was later terminated.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted the '489 patent against T-Mobile USA, Inc. in W.D. Tex.; an amended complaint was filed 2020-11-02, and the case was listed as related to Unified Patents v. Cedar Lane.
Cedar Lane filed suit against DISH Network in the W.D. Tex. involving US 8,165,867 and other patents (6,502,194; 6,526,411; 6,721,489; 7,173,177; 7,642,443). The case was terminated/closed; the docket number was not confirmed.
Cedar Lane sued ViacomCBS in the N.D. Ill. alleging infringement of US 8,165,867. The case was terminated; exact disposition was not confirmed.
Cedar Lane's Delaware suit against LiveXLive Media is listed in the '147 patent's litigation context, but the retrieved excerpt did not confirm that the '147 patent was asserted.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Royole Corporation in D. Del. asserting US 6,566,805 along with US 6,972,790 and US 8,537,242 according to the AO-120 report. An answer deadline was set for 2020-09-21, and the case was later terminated.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued TCL Communication, Inc. in D. Del.; the PTO patent report lists US 6,473,527, US 6,516,147, US 6,566,805, US 6,972,774, and US 6,972,790.
Cedar Lane sued TCL Communication in the District of Delaware alleging infringement of US 8,165,867. The case was terminated, reportedly through voluntary dismissal/settlement, but the exact dismissal date was not confirmed.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Motorola Solutions Inc. (amended to Motorola Mobility LLC) in a case docketed as 1:20-cv-03600. The narrative notes a jurisdiction conflict between N.D. Ill. and Illinois S.D.; Cedar Lane voluntarily dismissed the case.
Cedar Lane asserted US 8,165,867 against Sirius XM Radio in the S.D.N.Y.; the complaint expressly pleaded the '867 patent as Exhibit 8. The action was terminated.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Comcast Cable Communications LLC in W.D. Tex. asserting the '194 patent family; the case was terminated.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Comcast Cable Communications LLC in the Western District of Texas asserting U.S. Patent No. 6,978,475. The case was closed on 2020-10-13 after early termination and did not reach a merits judgment.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Sirius XM Radio Inc. in N.D. Tex. asserting the '194 patent family; the case was terminated.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Aspiro, Inc. in S.D.N.Y. U.S. Patent 6,526,411 appears among the asserted patents per IPWatchdog's filing roundup. Pending at the snapshot captured by UniCourt; outcome not verified.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Aspiro, Inc. in S.D.N.Y. asserting the '194 patent and eight other patents; the case was terminated, typical of Cedar Lane's settlement/dismissal campaign.
'790 attached as Exhibit 2 with claim chart (Ex. 5); docket showed 'Open' as of 2020-02-17. Later outcome not confirmed.
Acer is listed on the '147 patent's family litigation record in W.D. Tex. The retrieved docket excerpt did not name the patents asserted, so the '147 patent link is probable but not confirmed.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against ZTE Corp. and ZTE (USA) Inc. in W.D. Tex. asserting US 6,566,805. The case was closed by voluntary dismissal, with an order closing the case on 2020-05-11.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Charter Communications, Inc. in E.D. Tex. asserting the '194 patent and other patents over cable boxes; the case was transferred to D. Del. as 1:20-cv-00473.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Frontier Communications Corp. in E.D. Tex. asserting the '194 patent and other patents; the case was closed.
This is a patent infringement case likely filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. in the Illinois Northern District Court, asserting US patent 6972774.
Voluntary dismissal by plaintiff 2020-06-16; terminated ~2020-06-17.
Listed in Stanford NPE database.
Listed in Lexology's Feb. 2023 retail patent litigation report; patents identified as 6,972,790 and 8,537,242.
Complaint asserts '790 + '242; status not confirmed.
Asserted '790 + '242 (and '527 per complaint analysis).
Asserted '790 + '242.
Listed in Stanford NPE database.
Patent case (35 U.S.C.); whether '790 is asserted not confirmed in the retrieved record.
Cedar Lane '790-family case; stayed pending dismissal/settlement.
Judge Vince Chhabria granted a motion to strike third amended complaint, dismissed induced/contributory infringement claims, and ordered Cedar Lane and attorney Isaac Rabicoff to show cause. Parties stipulated to dismissal with prejudice (October 2020).
Cedar Lane '790-family case; stayed pending dismissal.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases in pleadings stage as of Oct. 2020.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases in pleadings stage as of Oct. 2020.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases in pleadings stage as of Oct. 2020.
'790 asserted, Exhibit 8 claim chart.
Cedar Lane '790-family case; the '790/'242 image-processing pair accused against camera products (e.g., Wyze Labs).
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted US 6,473,527 against ON Semiconductor Corp. in W.D. Tex.; Stanford NPE Database lists it as a '527 case. No outcome details provided.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted US 6,473,527 against Amazon.com Inc. in W.D. Tex.; Stanford NPE Database lists it as a '527 case. No outcome details provided.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted US 6,473,527 against Chicony America Group, Inc. in C.D. Cal.; Stanford NPE Database lists it as a '527 case. No outcome details provided.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Logipix Ltd. in E.D. Va.; Stanford NPE Database lists it as a '527 case.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Motorola Solutions, Inc. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing indicates US 6,473,527 is among asserted patents.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Ricoh USA, Inc. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued PixArt Imaging Inc. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Moxa Inc. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Tattile s.r.l. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Vanguard Integrated Solutions Ltd. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Samriddhi Automations Pvt. Ltd. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Silent Sentinel Ltd. in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Longse Technology Limited in W.D. Tex.; family-level listing.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Synectics PLC in W.D. Tex.; IPWatchdog attributes US 6,972,790, US 6,473,527, and US 8,537,242 to this case.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued KTC America in D.N.J.; IPWatchdog attributes US 6,473,527 along with US 6,972,790 and US 8,537,242.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Security Camera Warehouse, Inc. in D. Del.; Stanford NPE Database lists it as a '527 case.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Openeye US Inc. in D. Del.; Stanford NPE Database lists it as a '527 case.
Cedar Lane sued Pantum International in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal with prejudice, notice dated 2021-11-08, each party to bear own costs.
Cedar Lane sued Fantasia Trading in D. Del. on the '242 and related patents. Voluntary dismissal granted 2022-01-25.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 and '790 against The L.S. Starrett Company in D. Del.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Thorlabs, Inc. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Hewlett-Packard in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Qualcomm Incorporated in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Texas Instruments in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Lenovo Inc. in D. Del.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Phytech US Inc. in E.D. Va.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Snap Inc. in D. Del.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Epix Inc. in D. Del.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against COP Security System Corp. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Costar Technologies Inc. in N.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Longse Technology Limited in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Everfocus Co Ltd. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Logipix Ltd. in E.D. Va.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Domo Tactical Communications (DTC) Ltd. in E.D. Va.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Tattile s.r.l. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Vanguard Integrated Solutions Ltd. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Vimar SpA in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Samriddhi Automations Pvt. Ltd. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Silent Sentinel Ltd. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against NEXCOM International Co., Ltd. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Moxa Inc. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against PixArt Imaging Inc. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 against Zhuhai RaySharp Technology Co., Ltd. in W.D. Tex.
Cedar Lane sued Motorola Solutions, Inc. in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Closed; no merits ruling found.
Cedar Lane sued Ricoh Company Ltd. and Ricoh USA, Inc. in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Closed; no merits ruling found.
Cedar Lane sued Enterprise Holdings, Inc. in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal reported (PatSnap).
Cedar Lane sued Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. in W.D. Tex. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal 2023-03-29 (126 days), pre-answer; notice text characterized in one report as with prejudice, each party bearing own costs.
Cedar Lane sued Opticon Inc. in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Digital Check Corp. in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Snap One LLC in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued Latecoere SA in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Cedar Lane sued ZKTeco USA, LLC in D.N.J. on the '242. Voluntary dismissal without prejudice; no judgment, injunction, or damages.
Cedar Lane filed a series of D. Del. cases in October 2022 against these defendants on the '242; all closed per Unified Patents patent-specific docket list.
Cedar Lane sued Flyability SA in D. Colo. on the '242. Listed on the Unified Patents patent-specific page for US 8,537,242; closed.
Cedar Lane sued Sigma Defense Systems LLC in D. Colo. on the '242. Listed on the Unified Patents patent-specific page for US 8,537,242; closed.
Cedar Lane sued Kodak Alaris Inc. in W.D.N.Y. on the '242. Listed on the '242 patent page; closed.
Unified Patents reported this W.D. Tex. action by Cedar Lane against Comcast as involving US 8,165,867; the case number, filing date, and disposition were not confirmed.
Unified Patents reported this W.D. Tex. action by Cedar Lane against D-Link as involving US 8,165,867; the case number, filing date, and disposition were not confirmed.
Unified Patents reported this W.D. Tex. action by Cedar Lane against Disney as involving US 8,165,867; the case number, filing date, and disposition were not confirmed.
Unified Patents reported this W.D. Tex. action by Cedar Lane against LG Electronics as involving US 8,165,867; the case number, filing date, and disposition were not confirmed.
Unified Patents reported this W.D. Tex. action by Cedar Lane against iHeartMedia as involving US 8,165,867; the case number, filing date, and disposition were not confirmed.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed this case in W.D. Tex. as part of its campaign asserting the patent family. The defendant was not confirmed in the narrative; the case was terminated/settled.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Amazon.com, Inc. in W.D. Tex. The Stanford NPE database lists this case; it is believed to have settled or been dismissed.
Cedar Lane filed this recent E.D. Tex. action against Asustek, asserting U.S. Patent Nos. 10,346,105 and 6,516,147. The complaint includes a count for infringement of the '147 patent.
Cedar Lane reportedly sued Alterna Securities in Texas district courts in January 2025. The reported patents-in-suit include the '147 patent, 8,577,782, and 10,346,105; the docket number and outcome were not confirmed.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted U.S. Patent No. 6,721,489 against Aspiro, Inc. in S.D.N.Y.; the narrative cites an IPWatchdog roundup listing the '489 patent among patents asserted.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted the '489 patent against Sirius XM Radio Inc. in N.D. Tex.; the narrative cites a Cadwalader docket excerpt and a Judge Ed Kinkeade order dated 5/6/2020.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted the '489 patent against Dish Network in W.D. Tex.; the narrative cites Law Street Media and IPWatchdog as identifying the '489 patent among patents asserted.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted the '489 patent against Walt Disney Company in W.D. Tex.; the narrative cites an IPWatchdog roundup.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted U.S. Patents 6,526,411; 6,721,489; and 7,610,394 against Spotify USA in D. Del.; the narrative cites IPWatchdog.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted the '489 patent against LiveXLive Media, Inc. in D. Del.; the docket number was not confirmed. The narrative cites Law Street Media.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. asserted the '489 patent against Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. in W.D. Tex.; the case received a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice in November 2021.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. is listed as plaintiff in W.D. Tex. docket 6:22-cv-00043 on the Google Patents litigation list for the '489 patent family; the defendant was not identified in the narrative.
Litigation involving U.S. Patent 6,526,411 listed in the Google Patents/Unified Patents record. Defendant and outcome not verified in the narrative.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued DISH Network in W.D. Tex. The case was reported in an IPWatchdog roundup, but the retrieved patent list did not clearly show U.S. Patent 6,526,411, so the '411 tie is unconfirmed.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Walt Disney Company in W.D. Tex. U.S. Patent 6,526,411 was listed among the asserted patents per IPWatchdog. Outcome not verified.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued WideOpenWest, Inc. in the District of Colorado asserting U.S. Patent No. 6,978,475. The docket was active by December 2021, and the case was voluntarily dismissed on 2022-02-15.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Citibank, N.A. in W.D. Tex. asserting US 8,577,782. The action was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice on 2025-11-20 under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Middlegate Securities Inc. in S.D.N.Y. asserting US 8,577,782. It was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice (52 days), closed January 2026.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Uhlmann Price Securities, LLC in N.D. Ill. asserting US 8,577,782. The case was dismissed with prejudice pre-answer.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. filed suit against Booking Holdings, Inc. in W.D. Tex. asserting US 8,577,782 (per Stanford NPE database).
Docket number listed on the Google Patents litigation record for US 8,577,782; caption and defendant not confirmed in the narrative.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Unitech America, Inc. in E.D. Tex., asserting U.S. Patent 10,346,105. The filing was reported in 2021, but the final disposition was not confirmed in the narrative.