Defendant

GoPro, Inc.

8 cases as defendant.

Cases
8
Active
2
6 closed
Filed
2018–2026
Top venue
PTAB
2 cases
Also appears as a plaintiff in 3 cases → View as plaintiff

Company profile

GoPro, Inc., commonly known as GoPro, is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman and headquartered in San Mateo, California. It is a publicly traded company on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol GPRO. As of early 2026, GoPro reports approximately 636-696 employees and a trailing twelve-month revenue of around $490.5 million, with a market capitalization of approximately $178-185 million.

GoPro specializes in manufacturing and selling action cameras, primarily known for its HERO series and MAX cameras, along with various mounts and accessories. The company also develops mobile applications like GoPro Quik and video-editing software to complement its hardware. Additionally, GoPro offers a subscription service, GoPro Plus, which provides cloud storage, camera replacement services, and discounts on accessories.

In terms of patent litigation, GoPro, Inc. demonstrates an active posture as both a patent asserter and a defendant. While the provided case data lists GoPro with one plaintiff case and no defendant cases, wider searches reveal its involvement in defensive litigation as well. The tracked case, GoPro, Inc. v. Insta360, was filed in 2024-05-06 with the International Trade Commission (ITC), a venue often utilized for disputes involving imported goods.

In the ITC case against Insta360, an Administrative Law Judge initially found infringement on two of GoPro's patents, specifically a design patent and its HyperSmooth video stabilization technology, though many of GoPro's utility patent claims were found invalid or not infringed. Subsequently, the ITC issued a limited exclusion order for certain older models of Insta360's Ace series based on the design patent, while affirming that updated models fell outside the scope of GoPro's asserted design patent and finding no violation for five utility patents. Beyond this, GoPro has also defended itself in other patent infringement suits, including a successfully defended $174 million claim from non-practicing entity (NPE) Contour IP Holding, LLC in a California federal court, where a jury found non-infringement and invalidity of claims, and a settlement with DigiMedia Tech, LLC in Delaware. GoPro recently initiated a strategic review process, including a potential sale or merger, amidst competitive pressures in the action camera market.

Filing activity

2018: 1 case'18'19'202021: 1 case'21'22'232024: 4 cases4'24'252026: 1 case'26
Cases filed per year naming GoPro, Inc. as defendant.

Arashi Vision Inc. (d/b/a Insta360) et al. v. GoPro, Inc.

appealed
Docket:
IPR2024-01186
Filed:
2024-07-18
Patents:10574894

Inter partes review filed by Arashi Vision (Insta360) challenging claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10,574,894. The PTAB instituted review on January 22, 2025, and issued a final written decision on December 10, 2025 holding no challenged claims unpatentable. Insta360 filed a notice of appeal on February 6, 2026.

Arashi Vision Inc. d/b/a Insta360 v. GoPro, Inc.

final written decision, on appeal
Docket:
IPR2024-01164
Filed:
2024-07-12
Terminated:
2025-11-25
Patents:10958840

Inter partes review petition by Arashi Vision/Insta360 challenging US 10,958,840. The Final Written Decision on Nov. 25, 2025 held no challenged claims unpatentable; Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC filed a Notice of Appeal on Jan. 23, 2026.

Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC d/b/a Insta360 v. GoPro, Inc.

institution denied
Docket:
IPR2025-00017
Terminated:
2025-04-28
Patents:10529052

Insta360 filed an inter partes review petition challenging claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10,529,052. The Board denied institution on April 28, 2025, exercising discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) and Apple v. Fintiv due to the advanced parallel ITC investigation.