Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Basler
- Docket:
- 2:21-cv-05160
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.
Defendant
1 case as defendant.
Company overview. Basler AG is a German machine-vision manufacturer headquartered at An der Strusbek 60-62, Ahrensburg, Germany. It was founded in 1988 by Norbert Basler and Stephan Berendsen, and has been listed on the Deutsche Börse (ticker BSL) since 1999; it is not a subsidiary of a larger group, though court filings identify Norbert Basler Holding GmbH and Basler Beteiligungs GmbH & Co. KG as corporate parents/major holders. Public disclosures put headcount at roughly 820–850 employees across about 13 locations in Europe, Asia, and North America, with 2025 revenue of about €224 million (2024: ~€184 million).
Products / services. Basler designs and manufactures digital industrial cameras and imaging components for computer vision, spanning area-scan and line-scan cameras, 3D cameras, network/IP cameras, embedded-vision kits, lenses, illumination, frame grabbers, and vision software (including its VisualApplets platform). End markets include factory automation, medical and life sciences, traffic and transportation, logistics, retail, robotics, electronics, and battery inspection. This is an operating company, not a patent-assertion entity.
Patent-litigation posture. Basler appears once in the tracked data, as a defendant (0 plaintiff, 1 defendant) — the profile of an operating company targeted by an NPE. The case is Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Basler, filed by Cedar Lane, a Canadian-founded entity (2019) characterized by patent-office and NPE-tracking sources as a non-practicing entity asserting patents acquired from Intellectual Ventures, with a campaign exceeding 150 defendants. Venue activity by Cedar Lane has centered on the Western District of Texas (Judge Alan Albright) and other districts known for patent filings.
Notable cases / context. Two dockets are reflected: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Basler AG (W.D. Tex., 6:21-cv-00921, filed Sept. 2021, voluntarily dismissed without prejudice that November) and Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. Basler, Inc. (E.D. Pa., 2:21-cv-05160, filed Nov. 2021). The asserted patents (including US 6,473,527, 6,972,790, and a third in the same family) relate to image data processing/JPEG compression, and Cedar Lane's theory targeted Basler's surveillance-camera products. Basler moved to dismiss on service and failure-to-state-a-claim grounds; the tracked record does not resolve the merits.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.