Defendant

DISH Network L.L.C.

10 cases as defendant.

Cases
10
Active
3
7 closed
Filed
2016–2026
Top venue
D. Colorado
2 cases
Also appears as a plaintiff in 5 cases → View as plaintiff

Company profile

DISH Network L.L.C. ("DISH") is a U.S.-based telecommunications and television provider headquartered in Englewood, Colorado. The company was founded in 1980 by Charlie Ergen, Cantey Ergen, and Jim DeFranco as EchoStar Communications. As of December 31, 2023, DISH Network operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: SATS), following a merger that reunited the two companies after their 2008 split. Prior to the merger, DISH Network Corporation was a publicly traded company. Employee counts vary by source, with recent estimates ranging from approximately 14,200 to over 16,000.

As an operating company, DISH's primary business is providing pay-TV services. Its core offering is a direct-broadcast satellite television service under the DISH brand, which includes hardware like the Hopper line of DVRs. The company also operates Sling TV, an over-the-top (OTT) streaming service that delivers live television channels via the internet. In recent years, DISH has expanded significantly into the wireless market, acquiring Boost Mobile, Ting Mobile, and Republic Wireless, and is actively building out a national 5G wireless network.

The provided data shows DISH as a plaintiff in one tracked patent case and a defendant in none, indicating its position as an operating company that asserts its internally developed patent portfolio. This is distinct from a non-practicing entity (NPE) that primarily acquires patents to license or litigate. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, a common venue for patent disputes.

The notable tracked case is DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al. v. fuboTV Inc., filed in 2023. In this lawsuit, DISH accuses fuboTV, a competing streaming television provider, of infringing on several patents related to adaptive bitrate (ABR) streaming technology. ABR is a fundamental technology used to adjust the quality of a video stream in real-time based on a user's internet connection speed. This litigation highlights DISH's strategy of defending its technological innovations in the video streaming space against competitors.

Filing activity

2016: 1 case'162017: 2 cases2'17'18'192020: 1 case'20'212022: 1 case'22'23'242025: 1 case'252026: 1 case'26
Cases filed per year naming DISH Network L.L.C. as defendant.

Adeia Technologies Inc. et al. v. DISH Network Corporation et al.

Open / active
Docket:
1:26-cv-01373
Filed:
2026-03-31

Adeia entities sued DISH and related entities for patent infringement, asserting five patents including US 9,661,049. The '049 patent is asserted at least as to independent claim 15, accusing DISH's server-side dynamic ad-insertion workflows in DISH TV, DISH Anywhere, and Sling TV of generating and serving interspersed manifest specifications with URLs referencing video segments hosted on different domains. The case remained open; docket activity through mid-2026 included automatic-stay notices as to certain DISH entities.

Digital Broadcasting Solutions, LLC v. DISH Network L.L.C. et al.

transferred; stayed; administratively closed
Docket:
2:22-cv-00335-JRG; 1:23-cv-02946-CNS-SBP
Filed:
2022-08-29

Patent infringement suit by Digital Broadcasting Solutions against DISH asserting US 8,929,710 and US 9,538,122. Filed in E.D. Tex., transferred to D. Colo.; stayed since May 9, 2024, and administratively closed on July 8, 2024, pending PTAB proceedings and related appeals. DISH Technologies was dismissed without prejudice on November 8, 2022.

Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO et al. v. Sling TV L.L.C. et al.

stayed; partial judgment; remanded on fees
Filed:
2017-08-31

Realtime Data LLC (later Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC) sued Sling TV, Sling Media, and later DISH and Arris entities. The original complaint asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,275,897, 8,867,610, and 8,934,535, but the '897 patent was dropped from the Oct. 10, 2017 amended complaint, leaving '610 and '535. The litigation was stayed pending IPRs; '535 claims were dropped after PTAB invalidation, '610 claims were held ineligible under § 101 (affirmed May 11, 2023), and the attorneys'-fee award to DISH was vacated and remanded by the Federal Circuit on Aug. 23, 2024.

Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. DISH Network Corporation et al.

dismissed without prejudice
Docket:
6:17-cv-00421
Filed:
2017-07-19
Terminated:
2017-11-08

Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO sued DISH Network and related entities alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,275,897, 8,867,610, and 8,934,535. The action was severed from 6:17-cv-00084. A joint motion to dismiss without prejudice was filed Nov. 6, 2017, and entered Nov. 8, 2017.

Customedia Technologies, L.L.C. v. DISH Network Corporation et al.

dismissed with prejudice in favor of DISH
Docket:
2:16-cv-00129-JRG
Filed:
2016-02-10
Terminated:
2022-08-10

Customedia sued DISH for infringement of multiple patents, including the '437 patent, alleging infringement related to DISH's addressable advertising, DISH Anywhere, and Pay-Per-View/video-on-demand offerings. The '437 asserted claims were challenged and held unpatentable; after USPTO cancellation, the court dismissed the case with prejudice in DISH's favor.

Customedia Technologies, LLC v. DISH Network Corporation et al.

affirmed; rehearing denied
Docket:
18-2239, 19-1000
Terminated:
2020-06-09

Federal Circuit appeal of the CBM final written decisions for US 8,719,090 and US 9,053,494. The court affirmed the PTAB's invalidity holdings on 2020-03-06; rehearing and rehearing en banc were denied on 2020-06-09.