Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC

District court action in which the '046 patent was asserted, per Realtime's IPR2019-00209 mandatory notice. Terminated.

Asserted 7,386,046; 8,934,535; 9,769,477. Docket flagged 'TERMED'; specific disposition outcome not confirmed.

Additional district court action reported as involving the '046 patent.

Additional district court action reported as involving the '046 patent.

Additional district court action reported as involving the '046 patent.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Intel Corp. in the District of Colorado.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Mitel Networks, Inc. in the District of Colorado.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against LG Electronics Inc. et al. in the Eastern District of Texas.

Additional district court action reported as involving the '046 patent.

Additional district court action reported as involving the '046 patent.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Avaya Inc. in the District of Colorado.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Broadcom Corp. et al. in the District of Colorado.

District court action in which the '046 patent was asserted, per Realtime's IPR2019-00209 mandatory notice. Terminated.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Google LLC and YouTube, LLC in the Central District of California.

Realtime asserted U.S. Patent 9,578,298 as one of five patents ('046, '535, '298, '477, RE46,777) against Google and YouTube. The parties stipulated to stay the case pending IPR after the PTAB instituted IPRs covering 30 of 32 asserted claims.

Additional district court action reported as involving the '046 patent.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Wowza Media Systems, LLC in the District of Colorado.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Wowza Media Systems. The complaint and answer expressly listed the '462 among the patents-in-suit. Wowza answered and the case was resolved.

District court action filed 2018-04-20. Narrative states it likely asserted RE46777 because it was filed after reissue issuance, but this is not confirmed in retrieved sources.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC sued Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. in the Eastern District of Texas. The case is identified as involving U.S. Patent 8,929,442.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Samsung entities. The USPTO AO-120 form listed '8,634,462' as patent #5. The case was resolved.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted seven Realtime patents, including the '907 patent, against Samsung entities in the Eastern District of Texas. The AO-120 form lists the '907 patent as patent no. 2.

District court action filed 2018-03-09. The amended complaint expressly asserts RE46777, identifying it as the reissue of U.S. Patent No. 8,634,462. Final disposition not confirmed in retrieved sources.

District court action in which the '046 patent was asserted, per Realtime's IPR2019-00209 mandatory notice. Terminated.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Adobe. In the C.D. Cal. Google/Adobe claim-construction order, the five patents asserted against both Google and Adobe were listed as '046, '535, '298, '477, and RE46,777, suggesting the '462 may be related to or replaced by RE46,777. The case had a §101 motion to dismiss and claim construction on July 25, 2019.

Magistrate R&R recommended claim 15 of the '535 patent ineligible under § 101. Realtime voluntarily dismissed the Delaware action on July 22, 2019, refiled in C.D. Cal., and later dismissed the California actions.

District court action asserting the '046 patent. Motion to dismiss granted-in-part and denied-in-part by R&R on 2018-12-12; later dismissed.

Realtime asserted U.S. Patent 9,578,298 (one of six patents; a non-Fallon patent with the '462 patent) against Netflix and Netflix Streaming Services. The magistrate judge recommended denying dismissal of the '298 claim while recommending the Fallon patents be held § 101-ineligible; Realtime voluntarily dismissed the Delaware action in July 2019 and refiled parts in C.D. Cal., later voluntarily dismissing those too.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '462 patent against Netflix and Netflix Streaming Services. The court issued a report and recommendation on December 12, 2018, granting in part and denying in part a motion to dismiss; the '462 allegations were not part of the §101 Fallon ruling.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Sony entities. The case was dismissed with prejudice on November 5, 2018, upon joint motion.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC sued Netflix, Inc. and Netflix Streaming Services, Inc. in the District of Delaware asserting the '907 patent. Realtime voluntarily dismissed the Delaware suit after about 20 months following a magistrate judge's recommendation to invalidate four patents, then refiled in C.D. Cal.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Sony Electronics, Inc. in the District of Delaware; Sony Corporation was dismissed on Dec. 28, 2017, and the case was closed. Sony/Polycom IPRs on the '907 patent settled in Nov. 2018.

Related Delaware 'Fallon patents' case (plus the '442 patent). Outcome not separately confirmed.

Joint motion to dismiss filed Oct. 29, 2018; Judge Connolly dismissed plaintiff's claims with prejudice and defendant's claims without prejudice on Oct. 31, 2018.

Joint motion to dismiss Nov. 1, 2018; plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice and defendant's without prejudice on Nov. 5, 2018.

District court action in which the '046 patent was asserted, per Realtime's IPR2019-00209 mandatory notice. Dismissed by joint dismissal (related-case record, 2018).

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Haivision entities. Defendant's motion-to-dismiss brief contained an overview of the '462 and '298 patents. The case was later resolved/dismissed.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Brightcove Inc. and Brightcove Holdings, Inc. in the District of Delaware. The case was included in MDL No. 2845 Schedule A and was closed/dismissed.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Haivision entities in the District of Delaware. The case was included in MDL No. 2845, had Section 101 motion-to-dismiss briefing noted in a related Realtime case, and was closed.

Filed as part of the October 2017 wave. Outcome not independently confirmed.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Hulu. The complaint listed '462 as Exhibit F among patents-in-suit. The case was resolved.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Hulu, LLC in the Central District of California. The case was included in MDL No. 2845 Schedule A.

Patent infringement suit against Hulu in C.D. Cal. The docket confirms dismissal with prejudice by stipulated order on September 26, 2018; the '610 connection is drawn from mandatory notices in related IPRs.

The PTO Report on Filing (AO 120) for this docket lists 8,934,535; 9,769,477; 8,929,442 as asserted. Final disposition not independently confirmed.

Realtime asserted the '535 patent against DISH/Sling/EchoStar/Arris. Realtime withdrew its '535 claims on Jan. 12, 2021 after the PTAB invalidated claims 1–14. The case continued on the '610 patent; SJ of invalidity was affirmed, a fee award was vacated and remanded, and a later appeal was dismissed.

Realtime Data LLC (later Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC) sued Sling TV, Sling Media, and later DISH and Arris entities. The original complaint asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,275,897, 8,867,610, and 8,934,535, but the '897 patent was dropped from the Oct. 10, 2017 amended complaint, leaving '610 and '535. The litigation was stayed pending IPRs; '535 claims were dropped after PTAB invalidation, '610 claims were held ineligible under § 101 (affirmed May 11, 2023), and the attorneys'-fee award to DISH was vacated and remanded by the Federal Circuit on Aug. 23, 2024.

In October 2018, the C.D. Cal. court found claims 15–30 of the '535 patent ineligible under § 101 (the 'Google decision').

Part of the same C.D. Cal. campaign; progressed to claim construction/expert discovery. Final disposition not independently confirmed.

Asserted the '535 patent (claim 15) plus '046 and '477. The '477 claims and '535 claims 1–14 were later cancelled/invalidated in IPR.

Listed in petitioner mandatory notices as a '535 co-pending matter. Outcome not confirmed.

E.D. Tex. DISH/EchoStar action dismissed without prejudice on Nov. 8, 2017; DISH moved its dispute to Colorado.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC filed suit against Cisco Systems, Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas. The action is identified as involving U.S. Patent 8,929,442.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC filed suit against Brightcove Inc. et al. in the District of Delaware. The action is identified as involving U.S. Patent 8,929,442.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC filed suit against Polycom, Inc. in the District of Colorado. The action is identified as involving U.S. Patent 8,929,442.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC filed suit against Sony Electronics Inc. in the District of Delaware. The action is identified as involving U.S. Patent 8,929,442.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC sued Apple Inc. in the District of Colorado. An amended complaint dated Mar. 26, 2018 expressly listed U.S. Patent 8,929,442 among six patents-in-suit.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC filed suit against Adobe Systems Inc. in the District of Massachusetts. The case is identified as involving U.S. Patent 8,929,442.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC filed suit against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. in the District of Colorado. The case is identified as involving U.S. Patent 8,929,442.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC filed suit against ARRIS Solutions, Inc. in the District of Colorado. The complaint expressly pleaded infringement of U.S. Patent 8,929,442, asserting Claim 8.

The JPML denied Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC's § 1407 motion to centralize twelve actions in five districts. U.S. Patent 8,929,442 was one of eight patents identified as at issue in the litigation.

Apple complaint expressly pleaded infringement of the '046 patent. Dismissed by order of Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2018-10-12.

Action listed in the MDL Schedule A and later described as part of Realtime's district-court campaign against the '046 patent; dismissed by joint motion in late 2018.

Action listed in the MDL Schedule A and later described as part of Realtime's district-court campaign against the '046 patent; dismissed by joint motion in late 2018.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Hulu, LLC in the Central District of California.

Realtime asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Sony Electronics, Inc. The action was dismissed by joint motion on Nov. 1, 2018, though the narrative could not confirm whether the '477 patent was the subject of that dismissal.

Realtime asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Brightcove Inc. et al. The case was dismissed by joint motion on Oct. 31, 2018: plaintiff's claims with prejudice and defendant's counterclaims without prejudice; the narrative could not confirm whether the '477 patent was the subject of that dismissal.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Haivision Network Video Inc. in the District of Delaware.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Polycom, Inc. in the District of Colorado.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Apple Inc. in the District of Colorado.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Cisco Systems, Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. in the Eastern District of Texas.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Comcast Cable Communications, LLC d/b/a Xfinity et al. in the District of Colorado.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Adobe Systems Inc. in the Central District of California.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted U.S. Patent 9,769,477 against Cox Communications, Inc. in the Central District of California.

A case listed on the '477 patent's litigation page in the Western District of Texas; the defendant was not identified in the retrieved sources.

Realtime moved to consolidate its patent cases under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denied centralization in 2018; the '477 patent was one of the eight patents named in the MDL motion.

Realtime asserted U.S. Patent 9,578,298 as one of seven patents against Adobe Systems Inc. The case was filed in D. Mass. and transferred to C.D. Cal.; the court issued a claim construction order construing Claim 1 of the '298 patent on July 25, 2019.

Google's IPR petition listed this C.D. Cal. civil action as one in which U.S. Patent 9,578,298 was the subject. Hulu was also a petitioner in IPR2018-01227 and settled out of the IPR.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Brightcove Inc. and others. The case was listed on Google Patents litigation record for the '462 and was dismissed/closed.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Apple. The case is listed on Google Patents litigation record for the '462 and was resolved.

Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Cisco Systems. The case is listed on Google Patents litigation record for the '462 and was resolved.

JPML denied Realtime's §1407 motion to centralize twelve actions in five districts. The Panel expressly listed U.S. Patent No. 8,634,462 among the eight patents at issue. Centralization was denied.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Cisco Systems, Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas. The PTAB in IPR2018-01817 identified it as a proceeding involving the '907 patent.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Polycom, Inc. in the District of Colorado. The case was included in MDL No. 2845 Schedule A and listed on Google Patents' litigation record for the '907 patent.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Adobe Systems Inc. in the District of Massachusetts. The case was listed among proceedings affecting IPR2018-01817.

Google Patents' litigation record for the '907 patent lists this W.D. Tex. case involving Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC. The defendant(s) were not confirmed in the narrative.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation considered Realtime's motion to centralize 12 actions in D. Colo. or E.D. Tex. The Panel denied transfer on Aug. 1, 2018; the eight patents at issue included the '907 patent, and Schedule A listed multiple Realtime actions.

MDL proceeding involving the '610 patent as one of eight Realtime patents at issue. The Judicial Panel denied centralization on August 1, 2018. Schedule A listed numerous defendants, but the narrative cautions that this alone does not prove the '610 patent was asserted against every named defendant.

Federal Circuit appeal of the district court's § 101 summary judgment of invalidity of the '610 patent; affirmed May 11, 2023. The appeal number was not confirmed.