Defendant
2 cases as defendant.
Haivision Network Video Corp. is a U.S. entity of Haivision, the video-networking business founded in 2004 in Montréal by Miroslav (Mirko) Wicha. The parent, Haivision Systems Inc. (TSX: HAI), went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange on December 16, 2020, and is headquartered in Montréal with U.S. headquarters in Deerfield, Illinois. Haivision Network Video Inc. is listed in Haivision's annual filings as a wholly owned Delaware subsidiary, alongside Haivision KB Inc. and Haivision US Holdings Inc. The company reports roughly 380–390 employees and FY2025 revenue of about CAD 137.6 million; it remains majority-controlled by its founder. It is not an NPE.
Products / operations. Haivision supplies real-time, low-latency IP video infrastructure: video encoders/decoders (Makito line), 5G and bonded-cellular transmitters (Falkon series), the Kraken X1 AI edge processor for defense/ISR, Command 360 video-wall and visual-collaboration systems, and cloud/managed streaming services. Key markets are broadcast and media, enterprise, government/defense, and public safety (customers include U.S. federal agencies and professional sports leagues). It open-sourced the SRT streaming protocol and founded the SRT Alliance. Growth has come partly through acquisitions (Video Furnace, CoolSign, KulaByte, AVIWEST, CineMassive).
Litigation posture. Haivision appears in the tracked data only as a defendant — 0 plaintiff cases, 2 defendant entries, both the same 2017 District of Delaware action. This is the classic profile of an operating company targeted by a patent assertion entity, not a two-way litigant.
Notable case. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Haivision Network Video Inc. et al., C.A. No. 1:17-cv-01520 (D. Del., filed Oct. 26, 2017), naming Haivision Network Video Inc., Haivision Network Video Corp., and Haivision KB Inc. Realtime — a well-known video-compression NPE (affiliated with Realtime Data/IXO) — asserted Fallon-family patents on adaptive data compression. The court recommended dismissal on § 101 patent-eligibility grounds in 2018. The suit reflected Haivision's exposure as a video-codec supplier, and it was filed in Delaware rather than the Eastern District of Texas.
Realtime asserted the '462 patent against Haivision entities. Defendant's motion-to-dismiss brief contained an overview of the '462 and '298 patents. The case was later resolved/dismissed.
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC asserted the '907 patent against Haivision entities in the District of Delaware. The case was included in MDL No. 2845, had Section 101 motion-to-dismiss briefing noted in a related Realtime case, and was closed.