Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Video Network Security LLC
closed- Docket:
- 1:23-cv-00337
- Court:
- D. Del.
- Filed:
- 2023-03-25
Cedar Lane sued Video Network Security LLC in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Defendant
1 case as defendant.
Video Network Security, LLC (commonly "VNS") is a privately held U.S. company headquartered in Anaheim, California, operating the brand website vnsec.us. It reports a regional office in Dubai Silicon Oasis serving Middle East/North Africa customers. No parent company or public ticker is disclosed, and I could not verify a founding year from a primary source. Third-party aggregators (ensun, SignalHire) estimate roughly 51–100 employees and revenue in the $5–50M band; these are unverified estimates, not company-reported figures.
Products / operations. VNS is an operating company, not a shell licensor. It supplies video-surveillance hardware and software: IP cameras, CCTV systems, video management software (VMS), cloud video surveillance and storage servers, and analytics including license-plate recognition, face recognition, and business-intelligence/smart-city and transportation-security applications. It markets cybersecurity- and AI/IoT-integrated surveillance products and holds ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 certifications.
Litigation posture. VNS's tracked record is defendant-only: 0 cases as plaintiff, 2 as defendant. It is therefore an operating company targeted by a patent assertion entity, not an NPE. Both suits were brought by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc., a Canada-based NPE characterized as a patent assertion entity by Unified Patents and Stanford's NPE database (Cedar Lane has filed hundreds of suits, largely acquiring former Intellectual Ventures patents). The cases were filed in the District of Delaware before Judge Richard G. Andrews — not a plaintiff-friendly Texas venue.
Notable cases. Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Video Network Security, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-01405 (D. Del., filed Oct. 26, 2022), and Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Video Network Security LLC, No. 1:23-cv-00337 (D. Del., filed Mar. 26, 2023). Both asserted the same three patents — US 6,473,527, US 6,972,790, and US 8,537,242 — covering imaging-array host interfaces and JPEG compression, squarely relevant to camera/surveillance products. Cedar Lane voluntarily dismissed both cases without prejudice (March 22, 2023 and May 16, 2023), before VNS answered, so no merits ruling issued and the patents remain assertable.