Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Latecoere SA
closed- Docket:
- 1:22-cv-01629
- Court:
- D. Del.
Cedar Lane sued Latecoere SA in D. Del. on the '242. Closed.
Defendant
1 case as defendant.
Latecoere SA (also styled Latecoere) is a French aerospace supplier headquartered at 135 rue de Périole, Toulouse, founded in 1917. It is publicly listed on Euronext Paris, Compartment B (ISIN FR001400JY13; tickers LAT / LAEP.PA; Bloomberg AT.FP). Per its 2025 annual reporting, the group employed more than 6,000 people and generated revenue of €756.7 million; MarketWatch lists 2025 net income of about –€32.1 million and roughly 6,120 employees, with a market capitalization around €180 million. It is not a subsidiary.
Operations. Latecoere is a Tier‑1 aerospace supplier to Airbus, Boeing, BAE Systems, Bombardier, Dassault Aviation, Embraer, Lockheed Martin, Thales and others, operating across commercial, regional, business-aviation and defense segments. Its four business areas are: Aerostructures (doors, fuselage, wings and empennage, rods); Interconnection Systems (wiring, avionics racks, on-board systems, test benches); Services and special products (customer support, maintenance, repair, video systems); and Space (electrical harnesses and sub-assemblies for satellites, launchers and space vehicles). It operates in 13 countries across EMEA‑Asia and the Americas.
Litigation posture. In the tracked data Latecoere appears once, as a defendant (0 plaintiff cases, 1 defendant case) — the profile of an operating company defending against a patent-assertion suit rather than an NPE asserting a portfolio.
Notable case. The sole tracked matter is Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Latecoere SA, filed in the District of Delaware. Cedar Lane Technologies is a Canada-based non-practicing entity (classified as an NPE/PAE by Unified Patents and Stanford's NPE database) that asserts acquired patents, many originating from Intellectual Ventures, and has filed hundreds of suits, predominantly in the Western/Eastern Districts of Texas and D. Del., with the large majority resolved by settlement. The judicial account of the suit's merits is not characterized here.