5784584

9 known cases. View patent page →

Cases
9
Active
0
9 closed
Filed
2005–2008
Top venue
N.D. California
2 cases

Filing activity

2005: 1 case'05'06'072008: 3 cases3'08
Cases asserting US Patent 5784584 filed per year.

Technology Properties Ltd. et al. v. Fujitsu Limited

closed; judgment for ARM; CAFC summarily affirmed
Docket:
2:05-cv-00494
Filed:
2005-10-24
Terminated:
2007-12-20

Technology Properties Ltd. and Patriot Scientific asserted US 5,784,584, US 5,809,336 and US 6,598,148 against Fujitsu and other Japanese electronics groups. The case closed 12/20/2007; intervening defendant ARM won non-infringement, and TPL/Patriot conceded no infringement of the '148 and '336; the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed on 5/9/2008.

Japanese electronics manufacturers v. Patriot Scientific Corp., Technology Properties Ltd., Charles H. Moore

resolved in wake of Texas case; individual disposition not verified
Docket:
3:05-cv-04837

One of five declaratory judgment suits filed in December 2005 by roughly 20 Japanese electronics manufacturers against Patriot, TPL and Charles Moore, seeking declarations that the '584, '336 and '148 patents were not infringed and invalid.

HTC Corp. et al. v. Technology Properties Ltd. et al.

judgment
Docket:
5:08-cv-00882
Filed:
2008-02-08

HTC filed a declaratory-judgment action of invalidity/non-infringement as to the '336, '584, '749 and '148 patents. TPL counterclaimed for infringement of the '336, '749, '148 and '890 patents. After trial, the jury found HTC literally infringed claims 6, 7, 9, 13, 14 and 15 of the '336 patent with a $958,560 lump-sum royalty, not willful; JMOL denied and final judgment entered for TPL. Other patents were dismissed or carved out.

Technology Properties Ltd. et al. v. Fujitsu et al.

settled/dismissed

Patentee TPL/Patriot asserted at least US 5,784,584, US 5,809,336, and US 6,598,148 against Fujitsu, Matsushita, NEC, Toshiba, and JVC. The court construed the '584 instruction groups limitation on June 18, 2007; ARM-designed cores were held non-infringing and excluded from trial, affirmed by the Federal Circuit in May 2008. The action settled with Toshiba, Matsushita, and JVC on Dec. 18, 2007, and the Texas and California actions were voluntarily dismissed.

ASUSTeK Computer Inc. v. Technology Properties Ltd. et al.

settled/dismissed
Docket:
5:08-cv-00884-JF
Filed:
2008-02-08
Terminated:
2009-02-25

ASUSTeK brought a declaratory judgment action naming US 5,440,749, US 5,809,336, US 5,809,623, US 5,809,638, and US 5,784,584; the complaint was amended July 10 and September 23, 2008. The case settled December 18, 2008, and all claims were dismissed February 25, 2009.

Patriot Scientific Corporation v. Technology Properties Ltd. et al.

settled

Patriot Scientific sued Technology Properties Ltd., Daniel Leckrone, and Charles Moore over ownership of the Moore Microprocessor Portfolio patents expressly including US 5,440,749 and others. The dispute was resolved/settled in June 2005, with TPL granted responsibility for commercialization and licensing.