Plaintiff

Technology Properties Ltd.

6 cases as plaintiff.

Cases
6
Active
0
6 closed
Filed
2005
Top venue
E.D. Texas
2 cases
Also appears as a defendant in 14 cases → View as defendant

Company profile

Technology Properties Limited (TPL Group) is a privately held California corporation founded in 1988–89 and headquartered in Cupertino, California (court filings also give a San Jose address). It is not publicly traded; its size — headcount and revenue — is not disclosed in public sources, so no reliable figure can be given. Founder and chairman Dan Leckrone led the firm, with Charles H. Moore, inventor of the Forth programming language, serving as CTO. TPL operates through affiliates including Alliacense Limited (its licensing arm), MCM Portfolio LLC (holder of the "Core Flash" portfolio), and, from 2005, Phoenix Digital Solutions, a joint venture with Patriot Scientific Corp.

TPL is best characterized as an intellectual-property holding and licensing entity rather than a manufacturing operating company. Its principal asset is the Moore Microprocessor Patent (MMP) portfolio — seven U.S. patents plus European and Japanese counterparts, asserted to cover fundamental microprocessor techniques such as separate CPU/IO clocks ('336), multiple instruction fetch ('584), and on-chip oscillator/embedded memory ('148). The portfolio was jointly owned with Patriot Scientific and licensed by Alliacense; Intel, AMD, HP, Fujitsu, Sony, Nikon and others took licenses. Corporate materials also describe TPL as commercializing products (multi-core processors, packaging technologies), but these claims are unverified.

Litigation posture: TPL is predominantly an asserting entity, though the tracked data shows a two-way pattern (2 cases as plaintiff, 3 as defendant). It filed infringement suits in the plaintiff-friendly Eastern District of Texas (Marshall) before Judge T. John Ward — e.g. Technology Properties Ltd. et al. v. Fujitsu Limited (2005) — while also defending declaratory-judgment actions brought by accused manufacturers.

Notable cases: A group of roughly 20 Japanese electronics manufacturers (including Toshiba) filed DJ suits in N.D. Cal. (Oakland) in 2005 seeking declarations of non-infringement/invalidity; HTC filed a parallel DJ action (N.D. Cal., Judge Fogel), where a 2013 jury found HTC infringed the '336 patent and awarded a $958,560 lump-sum royalty. Separately, co-inventor Moore sued TPL and Alliacense in 2010 alleging fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, and ARM won a Federal Circuit non-infringement affirmance in 2008.

Watchlist

Get alerted when Technology Properties Ltd. sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Technology Properties Ltd. files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

Technology Properties Ltd. et al. v. Fujitsu Limited

closed; judgment for ARM; CAFC summarily affirmed
Docket:
2:05-cv-00494
Filed:
2005-10-24
Terminated:
2007-12-20

Technology Properties Ltd. and Patriot Scientific asserted US 5,784,584, US 5,809,336 and US 6,598,148 against Fujitsu and other Japanese electronics groups. The case closed 12/20/2007; intervening defendant ARM won non-infringement, and TPL/Patriot conceded no infringement of the '148 and '336; the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed on 5/9/2008.

Technology Properties Ltd. v. HTC Corp.

claim construction litigated; outcome not verified
Docket:
5:08-cv-00877-PSG

Technology Properties Ltd. and others brought this N.D. Cal. case against HTC Corp. and others. Claim construction on the '148 and '336 patents was litigated and the record is cited in USITC Pub. 4847.

Technology Properties Ltd. et al. v. Fujitsu et al.

settled/dismissed

Patentee TPL/Patriot asserted at least US 5,784,584, US 5,809,336, and US 6,598,148 against Fujitsu, Matsushita, NEC, Toshiba, and JVC. The court construed the '584 instruction groups limitation on June 18, 2007; ARM-designed cores were held non-infringing and excluded from trial, affirmed by the Federal Circuit in May 2008. The action settled with Toshiba, Matsushita, and JVC on Dec. 18, 2007, and the Texas and California actions were voluntarily dismissed.

Technology Properties Ltd. v. Japanese Electronics Vendors

Patents:5659703

Technology Properties Ltd. filed an infringement action in the Eastern District of Texas around October/November 2005 against Japanese electronics vendors (all but Sony). Patriot characterized it as a vehicle to obtain a faster infringement determination. The '703 connection is portfolio-level.

Technology Properties Ltd. et al. v. ARM, Ltd. et al.

appealed; Federal Circuit per curiam nonprecedential decision May 9, 2008
Docket:
2:05-CV-494
Patents:5604915

MMP portfolio enforcement action filed in 2005 in the Eastern District of Texas against ARM, Ltd. and ARM, Inc. The Federal Circuit issued a per curiam, nonprecedential decision on May 9, 2008. The narrative notes the '915 patent was a portfolio member but does not clearly identify it as specifically asserted in this action.

Technology Properties Ltd. v. ARM, Ltd.

per curiam nonprecedential decision
Terminated:
2008-05-09
Patents:5604915

Federal Circuit appeal from the Eastern District of Texas MMP portfolio enforcement action against ARM. The court issued a per curiam, nonprecedential decision on May 9, 2008. The narrative notes the '915 patent was a portfolio member but does not clearly identify it as specifically asserted in this action.