Invalidity dossier

US 9918511

Article of footwear having a textile upper

Current assignee: Nike, Inc.

Added 9/23/2026, 2:22:13 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Nike, Inc.

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 9,918,511 B2

Title: "Article of footwear having a textile upper"

Patent number / application: US 9,918,511 B2; Application No. US 15/664,587; earlier publication US 2017/0325535 A1.

Inventors: Bhupesh Dua and Edward Nathaniel Thomas.

Assignee: Nike, Inc. (originally and current listed assignee; assignment recorded 2017-09-18).

Key dates: Priority date 2004-03-03; filing date 2017-07-31; publication of application 2017-11-16; granted 2018-03-20; anticipated expiration 2024-03-03. Legal status listed as "Expired - Fee Related."

Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent concerns footwear characterized by its material, specifically an upper made using textile techniques. Its classifications point to footwear made of fibers or fabrics (A43B1/02), including braided, knotted, knitted, or crocheted constructions (A43B1/04), and to uppers (A43B23/02), including one-piece uppers (A43B23/04, A43B23/042), layered or laminated constructions (A43B23/0235, A43B23/026), and uppers having different properties in different directions, including a relatively rigid portion resisting articulation or torsion (A43B23/0265, A43B23/0275). The prior-art keyword list — "knit," "strip," "textile," "property," "footwear" — indicates a knitted textile upper in which differing properties (for example, stiffness or rigidity) are engineered into different regions.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9918511/en

What this excerpt does not establish: It contains no claims, no written description, and no drawings or reference numerals, so the precise claimed scope cannot be determined here. The classifications, keywords, and dates are as listed by the source (which notes its legal-status and priority-date entries are assumptions, not legal conclusions). Because litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, and prior-art analysis were excluded, nothing here should be read as a finding on those matters. The excerpt also does not explain how the recited properties are achieved or which materials are used.

(Word count: ~300)

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:21 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9918511. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Nike, Inc.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Nike, Inc.

This patent in court (1)

1 tracked lawsuit name US 9918511.