Nike, Inc. v. New Balance
active- Filed:
- 2023-11-06
Nike accused New Balance of infringing US8266749 (among other patents) with almost two dozen New Balance sneaker models in a lawsuit filed in Massachusetts.
Plaintiff
4 cases as plaintiff.
Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE), often referred to simply as Nike, is an American multinational corporation headquartered near Beaverton, Oregon. Founded on January 25, 1964, as "Blue Ribbon Sports" by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight, it officially became Nike, Inc. on May 30, 1971. Nike is a publicly traded company and is a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500. As of May 2026, it has a market capitalization of approximately $62.02 billion and employed around 77,800 people as of fiscal year 2025.
Nike is the world's largest supplier of athletic shoes and apparel and a major manufacturer of sports equipment. The company designs, develops, markets, and sells a wide range of products including athletic footwear (e.g., Air Jordan, Air Max, Nike Dunk, Air Force 1), athletic apparel, and sporting goods. Beyond its flagship brand, Nike Inc. also includes the Jordan and Converse brands. The company also operates retail stores under the Niketown name and has an online store.
Based on the provided case data, Nike Inc. operates as a defendant in patent litigation. With one tracked case and zero appearances as a plaintiff, the company's posture is that of an operating company defending against assertion suits.
The single tracked patent litigation case involving Nike Inc. is Pointwise Ventures LLC v. Nike Inc, filed on March 4, 2026, in the New York Southern District Court.
Watchlist
Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Nike, Inc. files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.
Nike accused New Balance of infringing US8266749 (among other patents) with almost two dozen New Balance sneaker models in a lawsuit filed in Massachusetts.
Nike accused Skechers of infringing US8266749 (among other patents) with more than two dozen Skechers models; Skechers alleges the claims of the '749 patent are invalid, with parallel litigation ongoing.
A jury initially found for Nike and awarded damages, but the district court granted a post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law for Lululemon, ruling US8266749 invalid based on obviousness and overturning the jury's verdict.
Puma challenged Nike's complaint and moved to dismiss claims of infringement for US8266749 and US9078488, arguing that the patents did not cover patentable subject matter; the court denied the motion.