Invalidity dossier

US 6942248

Occupant restraint device control system and method

Current assignee: Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

Added 9/22/2026, 6:46:29 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges2 lawsuits on fileasserted by Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,942,248 B2

Title: "Occupant restraint device control system and method" (source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6942248/en).

Identifiers: Publication US6942248B2; application US10/114,533, filed 2002-04-02; granted/publication date 2005-09-13; published application US20020140214A1 (2002-10-03). Inventors: David S. Breed, Wilbur E. DuVall, Wendell C. Johnson. Original assignee and current assignee listed: Automotive Technologies International Inc. Priority date listed as 1992-05-05 (a continuation-family chain through many earlier applications). Legal status shown as "Expired - Fee Related," with an adjusted expiration of 2013-03-03.

Purpose: Per the title, the patent concerns controlling an occupant restraint device (e.g., an airbag or similar passive safety arrangement), which the classifications place within electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, including detecting passenger presence/position and related safety parameters.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text): The excerpt provides only classification-based scope, not claims. Classifications cover occupant-detection means mounted in or on vehicle seats, including sensing of anthropometric parameters (e.g., heart rate, body temperature), driver-fatigue detection, and detection of passenger motion. The "prior art keywords" listed are vehicle, seat, signal, occupant, and contents, and the listed field includes cruise control, steering, and tire monitoring as well as occupant restraint control.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not reproduce the claims, written description, drawings, or any prior-art discussion, so no specific claim scope or inventive feature can be quoted. It does not establish the accuracy of the assignee, priority, expiration, or status entries (Google expressly labels these as assumptions/non-legal conclusions). It also does not establish any facts about litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art, which are outside this overview by instruction.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6942248/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:54:19 PM

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6942248. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

This patent in court (2)

2 tracked lawsuits name US 6942248.