Invalidity dossier

US 6712387

Method and apparatus for controlling deployment of a side airbag

Current assignee: Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

Added 9/22/2026, 6:46:28 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges2 lawsuits on fileasserted by Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 6,712,387 B1

Title: Method and apparatus for controlling deployment of a side airbag
Patent number: US6712387B1
Application number: US09/437,535
Inventor(s): David S. Breed; Wilbur E. DuVall; Wendell C. Johnson
Assignee: Automotive Technologies International Inc. (original and current assignee as listed)
Filing date: 1999-11-10
Publication/grant date: 2004-03-30
Priority date (stated as an assumption): 1992-05-05
Legal status: Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2012-05-05
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6712387/en

Purpose (as derivable from the supplied text): The patent concerns controlling deployment of a side airbag—i.e., circuitry/logic for triggering a passive safety arrangement—based on sensing conditions related to vehicle occupants. The classification entries indicate the subject matter falls under electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, including detection of passenger presence or position, occupant identification/categorization, and occupant body-part position (e.g., arm or leg).

Plain-language scope (from supplied materials): The title and classification data indicate a system that decides when (and possibly how) a side airbag deploys, informed by sensors that detect an occupant's presence, position, or body-part location. Classifications reference field-detection presence sensors using electromagnetic waves such as infrared, and seat-integrated occupancy detection. However, the excerpt provided contains no claim text, no abstract, and no written description, so the precise claimed scope cannot be described from this source alone. The classification terms are metadata, not claim language.

What the excerpt does not establish:

  • The specific claims, their limitations, or claim scope.
  • The detailed operation, sensor types, or algorithms actually described in the specification.
  • The accuracy of the priority date, legal status, or assignee listing (expressly disclaimed as assumptions/not legal conclusions in the source).
  • Any relationship to, or distinction over, prior art.

The excerpt further lists family members, related applications, and litigation references, which are outside the scope of this overview per instructions.

All statements above are limited to the supplied source text. Omitted specification content is not inferred.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:54:19 PM

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6712387. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

This patent in court (2)

2 tracked lawsuits name US 6712387.