Invalidity dossier

US 5901978

Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of a child seat

Current assignee: Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

Added 9/22/2026, 6:46:25 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges2 lawsuits on fileasserted by Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,901,978 A

Title: Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of a child seat.

Patent number / application: US 5,901,978 A; application US 09/084,641.

Assignee: Automotive Technologies International Inc. (original assignee; a 2010 assignment to the same-named entity is recorded, assigning inventors Breed, DuVall, and Johnson).

Inventors: David S. Breed, Wilbur E. DuVall, Wendell C. Johnson.

Key dates (as listed):

  • Prior art date / priority date: 1994-05-09 (the text labels these as assumptions, not legal conclusions)
  • Filing date: 1998-05-26
  • Publication/grant: 1999-05-11
  • Anticipated expiration: 2014-05-09
  • Legal status: Expired – Fee Related

External priority claims noted: from US 08/640,068 (1996-04-30, patent US5829782A) and US 09/047,704 (1998-03-25, patent US6116639A).

Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent concerns detecting whether a child seat is present in a vehicle, based on the supplied prior-art keywords — "seat," "contents," "vehicle," "signal," "occupant" — and classification entries covering child seats with detection or alerting means responsive to presence or absence of children and to installation of child seats (e.g., B60N2/266, B60N2/268). In ordinary terms, the invention appears directed to sensing whether a child seat occupies a vehicle seat and signaling that condition.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5901978/en (fetched 2026-09-22).

What this excerpt does not establish: The supplied text contains no claim language, abstract, or written description. Therefore it does not establish the actual claimed subject matter, the specific sensing technology used, how detection is performed, embodiments, or the precise scope of the invention. It also does not contain the full text (the excerpt notes omitted material). No conclusions are drawn here regarding litigation, ownership validity, or prior art.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:54:22 PM

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5901978. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Automotive Technologies International, Inc.

This patent in court (2)

2 tracked lawsuits name US 5901978.