- Filed
- Aug 31, 2025
- Last modified
- May 27, 2026
- Petitioner
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
- Inventor
- Won-Se Lee et al
Patent 9299730
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
Only one AIA trial proceeding, IPR2025-01499, has been filed against US Patent 9,299,730. This proceeding was Terminated-Settled, meaning no claims were adjudicated as unpatentable or patentable by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). For a defendant, this means the patent's claims remain untested by the PTAB, and there is no PTAB decision to leverage regarding claim validity.
IPR2025-01499 — BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co Ltd
- Type: Inter Partes Review
- Filed: 2025-08-31
- Status: Terminated-Settled. This indicates that the parties reached a settlement agreement and the PTAB proceeding was discontinued before a Final Written Decision was issued.
- Judge panel: Information on the specific judge panel is not publicly available without accessing the full case file, which is beyond the scope of this search.
- Petition grounds: Specific details on the claims challenged, the prior art cited, and the statutory basis (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) for the petition are not readily available in the provided Google Patents data or general search results for a terminated-settled IPR without reviewing the petition itself.
- Institution decision: Given the "Terminated-Settled" status, it is not clear from the available data whether the IPR was instituted before settlement or if the settlement occurred prior to an institution decision.
- Final Written Decision: No Final Written Decision was issued, as the proceeding was terminated due to a settlement.
- Settlement / termination: The proceeding was last modified on 2026-05-08 with a status of "Terminated-Settled". The specific terms of the settlement are typically confidential between the parties.
- Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit occurred, as there was no Final Written Decision to appeal.
- Defensive value: This proceeding offers no direct defensive value in terms of claim invalidation, as no claims were canceled by the PTAB. However, the fact that a settlement occurred indicates that the petitioner (BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.) found it commercially reasonable to resolve the dispute, potentially including the IPR, outside of a full PTAB trial. This could suggest a level of perceived risk or value associated with the patent.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US9299730 remain UNTESTED by a PTAB Final Written Decision. IPR2025-01499 was terminated due to a settlement between BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Samsung Display Co Ltd. This means there is no judicial finding on the patentability of any claims within US9299730 by the PTAB.
The estoppel landscape under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) generally bars petitioners and their privies from asserting invalidity grounds raised or that reasonably could have been raised during an IPR. However, for a terminated-settled IPR, statutory estoppel often does not attach in the same way as an IPR that proceeds to a Final Written Decision. A defendant not privy to BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. would likely not be estopped from challenging the patent on any prior-art grounds. For a defendant being asserted against today, all prior-art grounds are still potentially available, assuming they are not in privity with BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
The only signal from this single proceeding is that the patent owner (Samsung Display Co Ltd) and a challenger (BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.) chose to resolve their dispute through settlement. This is a common outcome in patent litigation and IPRs, but it does not provide an indication of the patent's robustness in a fully litigated PTAB context.
Recommended next steps
- Since IPR2025-01499 was settled and no claims were invalidated, a defendant facing assertion of US9299730 would need to conduct their own prior art search and analysis to identify potential invalidity arguments.
- The PTAB proceeding can be found on the Unified Patents portal, which notes its "Settlement" status. While the specific terms are private, the fact of settlement is public.
- There are currently no active PTAB proceedings on US9299730, meaning no upcoming milestones like institution decisions or Final Written Decisions.
Generated 5/23/2026, 6:48:52 AM