Patent 9281314B1
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (1)
Group view →Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9281314B1. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
- Palisade Technologies, LLP v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al.filed Oct 16, 20247:24-cv-00262U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texasterminated Jan 26, 2026Dismissed with prejudice
Defendants: Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas LLC
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Based on the information available as of April 26, 2026, U.S. Patent No. 9,281,314 B1 has been involved in at least one litigation case and a related proceeding at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Here are the details:
District Court Litigation
- Case Name: Palisade Technologies, LLP v. Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas LLC
- Plaintiff: Palisade Technologies, LLP.
- Defendants: Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas LLC.
- Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.
- Case Number: 7:24-cv-00262.
- Filing Date: October 16, 2024.
- Status: According to a report from May 9, 2026, the case was dismissed with prejudice on January 26, 2026, suggesting a settlement was reached between the parties. Palisade Technologies is now permanently barred from re-filing the same infringement claims against Micron.
In this case, Palisade Technologies, LLP alleged that Micron's DRAM, NAND Flash, NOR Flash memory products, and storage devices infringed on five of their patents, including the '314 patent. Micron denied the allegations.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Proceeding
- Case Name: Micron Technology Inc. v. Palisade Technologies, LLP
- Petitioner: Micron Technology, Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.
- Patent Owner: Palisade Technologies, LLP
- Jurisdiction: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
- Case Number: IPR2025-01009
- Filing Date: The petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) was filed by Micron as a counter-action to the district court litigation.
- Status: On October 17, 2025, the PTAB denied the institution of the IPR on discretionary grounds. Micron subsequently filed a Request for Director Review of this decision on April 16, 2025.
Background on the '314 Patent:
According to documents filed in the IPR proceeding, Palisade Technologies, LLP was formed in July 2024, acquired the '314 patent in August 2024, and filed the lawsuit against Micron in October 2024. The patent had not been asserted in any infringement proceedings prior to this.
Generated 5/13/2026, 12:08:21 AM