Patent 12216339

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Luxottica OF America Inc, EssilorLuxottica SA, Meta Platforms Inc, Oakley Inc, Meta Platforms Technologies LLC, Daitona Carter

1 active
Pending
Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Last modified
Jun 23, 2026
Petitioner
Luxottica of America Inc. et al.
Inventor
Ernesto Carlos Martinez Villalpando et al

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US patent 12216339. This suggests the patent has not yet been challenged at the PTAB, offering a defendant a broad range of options for invalidity contentions.

Strategic summary

As of the current date, US patent 12216339 has no recorded PTAB trial proceedings. This means all claims of the patent are currently UNTESTED by the PTAB.

The absence of PTAB activity implies that the full scope of prior art potentially relevant to the patent's claims has not been formally adjudicated in an AIA trial. For a defendant facing assertion, this presents an open estoppel landscape. All prior-art grounds that could be raised in an IPR, PGR, or CBM trial are theoretically still available for a future petitioner to assert. There is no evidence of a pattern of challenges by a single petitioner or aggressive PTAB appeals by the patent owner, as no proceedings exist.

Recommended next steps

Since there is no PTAB activity on file for US patent 12216339, a defendant facing assertion could consider initiating an AIA trial (such as an Inter Partes Review) if a robust prior art challenge can be mounted. The absence of previous challenges means the claims have not been hardened against PTAB scrutiny, which could be an advantage for a new petitioner.

Generated 5/31/2026, 12:47:54 AM