Litigation
Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Acer Inc. et al.
claim construction; one claim invalidated as indefiniteAuto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
Patents at issue (7)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (2)
Summary
IDT infringement action against Acer, Microsoft, and others in the Eastern District of Texas. In 2014, the court issued a claim construction order and invalidated one claim as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112(2); the '816 patent was among the patents-in-suit.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).