Patent litigation attorney
Jeffrey R. Bragalone
71 tracked appearances — 54 plaintiff · 17 defendant.
Specialty & background
I'll research this attorney's background and practice before drafting the summary.
Good baseline. Let me dig into firm history, notable outcomes, and Federal Circuit work.
Let me verify the highest-profile outcomes and the attorney's bar/registration status.
Jeffrey R. Bragalone — patent litigation practice summary
Focus and side preference. Bragalone is a Dallas-based patent trial lawyer whose tracked docket is overwhelmingly plaintiff-side: 54 plaintiff appearances against 17 defendant appearances. He principally represents patent owners and NPE/PAE-style plaintiffs, but maintains a real defense practice for operating companies. His technology mix clusters in consumer-electronics hardware — LED/display backlighting and light-emitting panel assemblies are the recurring core (the Innovative Display Technologies LLC / Delaware Display Group LLC campaigns against Acer, ZTE, BlackBerry, Dell, HP, Amazon, LG, Vizio, Sprint, T-Mobile and auto OEMs) — along with cellular/wireless and standards-related portfolios (Cellular Communications Equipment LLC, Super Interconnect Technologies, Wi-LAN, Stingray IP Solutions), data/software platforms (Byteweavr v. Cloudera and Databricks), and a smaller mechanical/electronics defense docket (Securus inmate telecommunications; Intersil ambient light sensors).
Firm context. Bragalone Conroy P.C. (2200 Ross Ave., Dallas) accounts for 62 of the 71 tracked appearances and is the firm with which he is most identified. The case list shows the same Dallas patent litigators — Bragalone with Daniel F. Olejko, Terry A. Saad and Patrick J. Conroy — later appearing under Bragalone Olejko Saad P.C. (901 Main St., Dallas), so the track record reflects that boutique across both firm names rather than a move through large-firm IP departments. He has no apparent in-house affiliation.
Notable cases and outcomes. The IDT/DDG assertion campaign is his most prominent plaintiff work; a third-party survey of IDT's docket reported that the bulk of those suits terminated by settlement (with a 2015 IDT v. Mercedes-Benz matter resolved by "[f]avorable settlement following mediation" per his Avvo case list). His highest-profile defense matter was Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Intersil Corp. (E.D. Tex.), where he represented Intersil through a four-week jury trial that produced a verdict for TAOS exceeding $88 million across trade-secret, contract, tortious-interference and patent claims; post-trial rulings trimmed duplicative awards, and the Federal Circuit subsequently vacated the damages and narrowed liability (TAOS v. Intersil/Renesas, 895 F.3d 1304 (Fed. Cir. 2018)), with later proceedings continuing on remand. He has argued three patent appeals before the Federal Circuit — Greenliant Sys. v. Xicor, 692 F.3d 1261 (2012); United Access Techs. v. Earthlink, 432 F. App'x 976 (2011); and Board of Regents of the Univ. of Texas Sys. v. BenQ America, 533 F.3d 1362 (2008) — and briefed Tegic Commc'ns v. Board of Regents, 458 F.3d 1335 (2006). In August 2025 his firm filed an amicus brief at the Federal Circuit on behalf of Acacia Research Group.
PTAB/IPR experience and credentials. He is a regular PTAB practitioner, appearing almost exclusively as back-up or pro hac vice counsel for patent owners across numerous IPRs and at least one PGR — including IDT (IPR2014-01094, IPR2015-00487), Securus (IPR2016-01220; PGR2016-00044), Cellular Communications Equipment (IPR2016-01493/1500/1501/1503), Collabo Innovations, Automation Middleware Solutions, and Super Interconnect (IPR2019-01590–92) — and has argued orally before the Board (e.g., IPR2014-00785, IPR2014-00824, IPR2015-00487). Notably, PTAB filings list him as pro hac vice rather than by USPTO registration number, with registered practitioners such as Justin B. Kimble, Saad and Nicholas Kliewer serving as lead counsel; that pattern suggests he is not himself a registered patent practitioner, though this is an inference from filings rather than a directly sourced statement. Bar/education: J.D., University of Texas School of Law (1987); licensed in Texas since 1987; Federal Circuit bar admission 2005; repeatedly listed in Super Lawyers (2003–2026) for business litigation and IP litigation.
Firms
Roles
- lead counsel25
- back-up counsel16
- lead trial counsel10
- Lead Counsel7
- counsel4
- Counsel2
- trial counsel2
- co-lead counsel1
- pro hac vice counsel1
- pro hac vice1
- pro hac vice plaintiff's counsel1
- back-up counsel; lead trial counsel1
Cases (71)
- Δ defendant[Unknown Petitioner] v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · counsel
- π plaintiffCardWare Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Bragalone Olejko Saad · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffCollabo Innovations, Inc. v. Aptina (U.S.) Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffCollabo Innovations, Inc. v. Toshiba Corporation et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Pantech Co., Ltd.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Sony CorporationBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Vizio, Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. General Motors LLCBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. LG Display AmericaBragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. LG Display Co.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. Pantech Co. Ltd.Bragalone Conroy · pro hac vice plaintiff's counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. VIZIO Inc.Bragalone Conroy · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC and/or Delaware Display Group LLC v. [Unknown Defendant]Bragalone Conroy · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC et al. v. Amazon.com Inc.Bragalone Conroy · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC et al. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Acer Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Canon U.S.A. Inc.Bragalone · counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Dell et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Dell Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Companycounsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Huawei Investment & Holding Co.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hyundai Motor GroupBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Mazda Motor CorporationBragalone Olejko Saad · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.Bragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Bragalone Olejko Saad · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Research in Motion LimitedBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Sprint CorporationBragalone Olejko Saad · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp.Bragalone Olejko Saad · Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Bragalone Conroy · Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Volkswagen AGBragalone Olejko Saad · lead counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. ZTE Corp.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- Δ defendantK.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- Δ defendantK.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. et al. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. et al. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Display Group LLCBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Display Group LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · trial counsel
- Δ defendantLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- Δ defendantLG Electronics, Inc. v. Delaware Display Group LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- Δ defendantLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel; lead trial counsel
- Δ defendantLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffMercedes-Benz USA LLC v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · pro hac vice
- Δ defendantMercedes-Benz USA LLC v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffMercedes-Benz USA LLC v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- Δ defendantMercedes-Benz USA LLC v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- Δ defendantSony Corporation v. Delaware Display Group LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffStingray IP Solutions LLC v. Unknown DefendantBragalone Olejko Saad · co-lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Olejko Saad · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · pro hac vice counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · lead trial counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · trial counsel
- Δ defendantVIZIO, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · back-up counsel