Patent litigation attorney
Daniel F. Olejko
33 tracked appearances — 32 plaintiff · 1 defendant.
Specialty & background
Daniel F. Olejko is a shareholder at Bragalone Olejko Saad PC, where his practice focuses on complex commercial and patent litigation, with a particular emphasis on appellate matters. His technological expertise spans a wide range of areas, including LED and LCD displays, CCD and CMOS image sensors, telecommunications systems, semiconductor design and fabrication, software processes, and medical devices. He also handles matters involving fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) and standard-essential patents, as well as sensor technologies.
Olejko primarily represents plaintiffs in patent infringement disputes, as indicated by his three tracked appearances as lead counsel for patent owner entities such as Innovative Display Technologies LLC and Delaware Display Group LLC. While his firm, Bragalone Olejko Saad PC, states it represents both plaintiffs and defendants in its intellectual property litigation practice, Olejko's specific case history and client descriptions suggest a focus on asserting patent owner rights for inventors, small businesses, and technology companies.
Throughout his career, Olejko has been involved in significant patent cases. He served as lead counsel for Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc., and Delaware Display Group LLC v. VIZIO Inc. Other notable engagements include representing a patent owner in a lawsuit against 18 semiconductor companies in HSM Portfolio LLC v. Elpida Memory, Inc. in the District of Delaware and representing a university in a Section 337 investigation before the U.S. International Trade Commission concerning CMOS image sensor designs. He also successfully briefed ColorQuick's response to Vistaprint's petition for writ of mandamus in a precedential decision by the Federal Circuit.
Olejko possesses substantial experience in post-grant proceedings, having represented clients in numerous matters before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including successfully defending a patent owner against petitions for covered business method review in Global TelLink Corp. v. Securus Technologies, Inc.* He also briefed the successful appeal of a PTAB final written decision in that case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Olejko earned his J.D. from Penn State University Dickinson School of Law in 2007 and holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Purdue University, awarded in 2004.
Firms
Roles
- of counsel7
- pro hac vice5
- trial counsel5
- co-counsel4
- counsel3
- Lead Counsel2
- plaintiffs' counsel2
- lead counsel1
- case team (PTAB/appellate)1
- counsel of record1
- pro hac vice plaintiff's counsel1
Cases (33)
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al.Bragalone Conroy · co-counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Lenovo Group Ltd. et al.Bragalone Conroy · trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc.Bragalone Conroy · lead counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · of counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · pro hac vice
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Pantech Co., Ltd.Bragalone Conroy · of counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Sony CorporationBragalone Conroy · of counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Vizio, Inc.Bragalone Conroy · counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.Bragalone Conroy · plaintiffs' counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.Bragalone Conroy · pro hac vice
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. LG Display AmericaBragalone Conroy · plaintiffs' counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. LG Display Co.Bragalone Conroy · trial counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. Pantech Co. Ltd.Bragalone Conroy · pro hac vice plaintiff's counsel
- π plaintiffDelaware Display Group LLC v. VIZIO Inc.Bragalone Conroy · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC et al. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · co-counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Acer Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · case team (PTAB/appellate)
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc.Bragalone Conroy
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc.Bragalone Conroy · of counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Dell et al.Bragalone Conroy · co-counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Dell Inc. et al.Bragalone Conroy · co-counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyBragalone Conroy · counsel of record
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Huawei Investment & Holding Co.Bragalone Conroy · counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Bragalone Olejko Saad · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. Research in Motion LimitedBragalone Conroy · counsel
- π plaintiffInnovative Display Technologies LLC v. ZTE Corp.Bragalone Conroy · of counsel
- π plaintiffLG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · trial counsel
- π plaintiffLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · pro hac vice
- Δ defendantLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · of counsel
- π plaintiffLG Electronics, Inc. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLCBragalone Conroy · trial counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · of counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · pro hac vice
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · trial counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseBragalone Conroy · pro hac vice