7525535

3 known cases. View patent page →

Cases
3
Active
0
3 closed
Filed
2022–2025
Top venue
E.D. Texas Marshall
1 case

Filing activity

2022: 1 case1'222023: 1 case'23'242025: 1 case'25
Cases asserting US Patent 7525535 filed per year.

VideoLabs, Inc. v. TCL Technology Group Corporation et al.

dismissed with prejudice; closed
Docket:
2:25-cv-00161-JRG-RSP
Filed:
2025-02-10
Terminated:
2025-11-14
Patents:8220027752553577692387970059813987882912368667304
π VideoLabs, Inc.Δ TCL Technology Group CorporationΔ TCL Electronics Holdings, Ltd. (f/k/a TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, Ltd.)Δ TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd.Δ T.C.L. Industries Holdings (H.K.) LimitedΔ TTE CorporationΔ TCL Moka International Ltd.Δ TCL Moka Manufacturing S.A. de C.V.Δ Manufacturas Avanzadas S.A. de C.V.Δ TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd.Δ Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.Δ TCL Optoelectronics Technology (Huizhou) Co., Ltd.Δ TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.

VideoLabs sued TCL entities for infringement of seven patents, including the '027 patent, accusing the infrastructure and equipment comprising TCL's TCLtv+ service, with at least independent claim 10 of the '027 patent asserted. The case was dismissed with prejudice and closed by order entered November 14, 2025.

VideoLabs, Inc. et al. v. Apple Inc.

dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
3:23-cv-01307
Filed:
2023-03-21
Patents:75255358605794
π VideoLabs, Inc.π VL Collective IP LLCΔ Apple Inc.

VideoLabs and VL Collective IP LLC sued Apple asserting US 7,525,553 and US 8,605,794. The case was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a stipulated agreement approximately 199 days after filing, with each party bearing its own fees and costs. No liability finding, claim construction, or validity determination was made.