Plaintiff

VideoLabs, Inc.

9 cases as plaintiff.

Cases
9
Active
0
9 closed
Filed
2021–2025
Top venue
D. Delaware
2 cases
Also appears as a defendant in 3 cases → View as defendant

Company profile

VIDEOLABS Inc., commonly known as VideoLabs, is a private intellectual property (IP) licensing platform headquartered in Silicon Valley, California, with a presence in Europe and Asia. The company was founded in 2018. While a specific employee count is not widely disclosed, VideoLabs highlights a team of seasoned IP, legal, and technology experts, whose collective experience in patent-related transactions exceeds $10 billion. VideoLabs has received Series A funding, with Soryn IP Group and Bardin Hill Investment Partners leading the round.

VideoLabs operates by identifying, acquiring, and aggregating high-quality patents primarily focused on video technology and the digital content ecosystem. It then offers strategic licensing programs and consulting services to technology companies. The company's stated mission is to create a more efficient, respected, and balanced global IP environment by providing predictable, low-cost access to essential patents through its industry-sponsored patent collective platform, aiming to reduce litigation risk and licensing costs for its members. Its patent portfolio includes assets acquired from notable companies such as Nokia, Alcatel-Lucent, Siemens, 3Com, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Panasonic, Ericsson, Samsung, and LG.

Based on its litigation record of three plaintiff cases and zero defendant cases, VideoLabs Inc. operates as a non-practicing entity (NPE) asserting an acquired patent portfolio. The company's litigation posture evolved after facing a lack of industry support for its membership model, leading it to pursue enforcement through the courts. Its cases are concentrated in plaintiff-friendly venues such as the Eastern District of Texas, alongside appearances in the Delaware District Court and before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Notable cases include VideoLabs, Inc. v. Roku, Inc., filed in the Delaware District Court in October 2023. However, VideoLabs and Roku announced a patent licensing agreement in November 2023, resulting in the termination of all pending litigation between the parties. VideoLabs has also been involved in a case against Unified Patents before the PTAB. Other past defendants in VideoLabs' patent assertion campaigns have included Amazon, Dell, Starz, Apple, Netflix, and other major technology companies.

Watchlist

Get alerted when VideoLabs, Inc. sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when VideoLabs, Inc. files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

Filing activity

2021: 1 case'212022: 2 cases'222023: 3 cases3'23'242025: 1 case'25
Cases filed per year with VideoLabs, Inc. as plaintiff.

VideoLabs, Inc. v. TCL Technology Group Corporation et al.

dismissed with prejudice; closed
Docket:
2:25-cv-00161-JRG-RSP
Filed:
2025-02-10
Terminated:
2025-11-14

VideoLabs sued TCL entities for infringement of seven patents, including the '027 patent, accusing the infrastructure and equipment comprising TCL's TCLtv+ service, with at least independent claim 10 of the '027 patent asserted. The case was dismissed with prejudice and closed by order entered November 14, 2025.

VideoLabs, Inc. v. Roku, Inc.

dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
1:23-cv-01136
Filed:
2023-10-11
Terminated:
2024-12-26
Patents:8667304

VideoLabs, Inc. et al. sued Roku, Inc. in the Delaware District Court. The case was dismissed with prejudice on December 26, 2024, following a stipulation of dismissal by Roku, Inc.

VideoLabs, Inc. v. HP Inc.

closed/stayed
Docket:
6:23-cv-00641
Filed:
2023-08-31

VideoLabs accused HP of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 7,435,608, 7,970,059, and 8,291,236. HP was also a counterclaim-plaintiff. Judge Derek T. Gilliland issued a claim construction order on Aug. 26, 2024 and granted a scheduling-order extension on Feb. 11, 2025; docket flags indicate the case is closed/stayed.

VideoLabs, Inc. et al. v. Apple Inc.

dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
3:23-cv-01307
Filed:
2023-03-21

VideoLabs and VL Collective IP LLC sued Apple asserting US 7,525,553 and US 8,605,794. The case was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a stipulated agreement approximately 199 days after filing, with each party bearing its own fees and costs. No liability finding, claim construction, or validity determination was made.