18 known cases. View patent page →
Complaint against Marvell Technology, Inc., filed 2025-08-18 per UniCourt, Judge Alan D. Albright; joint motion to stay citing settlement 2025-10-29 and voluntary dismissal 2025-10-31. Exhibit list referenced '465, RE44,904 and '249, so '807's inclusion is unconfirmed.
CommWorks sued RCN Telecom Services in S.D.N.Y.; the case was terminated by consent judgment before Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. The complaint expressly pleaded the US 7,027,465 count; the narrative notes it was also docketed as 1:20-cv-07529.
CommWorks sued Comcast entities in W.D. Tex.; the complaint expressly pleaded the US 7,027,465 count. The UniCourt snapshot listed the case as pending with no merits ruling surfaced.
CommWorks sued Technicolor entities in N.D. Ga. The narrative states the article asserted 'some of these same patents' but that US 7,027,465 was not expressly named and is unconfirmed in this case.
CommWorks sued Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. and four others in W.D. Tex.; RPX reported 8 patents-in-suit and 4 accused products. The accused WMM functionality of Arris NVG468MQ was mapped to US 7,027,465 and RE44,904; no merits ruling was found.
CommWorks sued Vyve entities in W.D. Tex. The case was dismissed with prejudice, each party bearing its own costs, with no invalidity or infringement finding. US 7,027,465 was asserted with RE44,904 and other companion patents.
CommWorks sued Extreme Networks in W.D. Tex.; the case was dismissed with prejudice on joint motion around May 17, 2024, with no merits ruling or fee-shifting. US 7,027,465 was asserted with RE44,904 and other companion patents.
CommWorks sued TRENDnet in C.D. Cal.; the case was dismissed with prejudice with mutual costs. The accused TEW-813DRU line was at issue, and US 7,027,465 was asserted with RE44,904 and other companion patents.
CommWorks sued ASUSTeK Computer in E.D. Tex.; the complaint asserted 10 patents. Claim 1 of US 7,027,465 was asserted against WMM functionality, and RE44,904 claim 7 was also asserted.
CommWorks sued Axon Networks in C.D. Cal.; the complaint PDF expressly named US 7,027,465. The narrative did not verify further status details.
CommWorks sued DrayTek in E.D. Tex.; Exhibit E was an 'Evidence of Use Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,027,465'. Further status was not verified in the narrative.
CommWorks sued AVM GmbH (also docketed as AVM Corp) in E.D. Tex.; the case was dismissed without prejudice on 2025-06-19. Exhibit E mapped WMM of the FRITZ!Box 7390 to US 7,027,465 and RE44,904.
CommWorks sued EarthLink in E.D. Tex.; Exhibit C was an 'Evidence of Use Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,027,465'. The case closed after a voluntary dismissal notice on 2025-10-03 and an order dismissing the case on 2025-10-10.
CommWorks sued STMicroelectronics in W.D. Tex.; an exhibit was an 'Evidence of Use Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,027,465'. The case was pending at the time of the narrative.
CommWorks sued NXP USA in W.D. Tex. The case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), notice filed 2025-10-31, with no invalidity or claim-construction ruling. US 7,027,465 was asserted with RE44,904 and other companion patents.
CommWorks sued Grandstream Networks in E.D. Tex.; Exhibit D was a claim chart for US 7,027,465. The Rule 7.1(a)(1) disclosure identified corporate parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC, and the case was pending.
Case listed in the narrative as CommWorks Solutions, LLC litigation in Google Patents family litigation for US 7,027,465; defendant identity and details were not verified.
CommWorks Solutions, LLC sued VTech Holdings Ltd. in E.D. Tex. The complaint attachment 'Exhibit C – Evidence of Use Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,911,979' is included. The '979 patent was asserted together with its family siblings.