Defendant

Ruckus Wireless, Inc.

6 cases as defendant.

Cases
6
Active
1
5 closed
Filed
2013–2021
Top venue
C.D. California
1 case
Also appears as a plaintiff in 1 case → View as plaintiff

Company profile

I'll research this company before writing.

Ruckus Wireless, Inc. (RUCKUS Networks) — Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, Ruckus is a wireless networking equipment vendor. It is no longer independent: it IPO'd on the NYSE (ticker RKUS), was acquired by Brocade Communications in 2016 for ~$1.5 billion, passed to ARRIS International in 2017 (~1,700 employees at that time), and became part of CommScope Holding Company (NASDAQ: COMM) when CommScope acquired ARRIS in April 2019. Ruckus now operates as CommScope's RUCKUS Networks business/brand; CommScope reported RUCKUS net sales of about $190 million in Q2 2025.

Products / operations. Ruckus is an operating company that designs and sells enterprise and service-provider Wi-Fi and wired networking gear: indoor and outdoor Wi-Fi access points (Wi-Fi 6/6E/7), ICX campus/stackable switches, SmartZone and ZoneDirector controllers, controller-less Unleashed APs, the AI-driven RUCKUS One cloud management platform, Cloudpath enrollment/security software, RUCKUS Edge, IoT and WAN gateway products. Its patented BeamFlex+ adaptive antenna, ChannelFly and SmartCast technologies are core differentiators. Target verticals include education, hospitality, healthcare, MDUs, retail, public venues, federal/government and service providers.

Patent-litigation posture. Ruckus is predominantly a defendant — 5 of 6 tracked cases — and every tracked dispute involves the same adverse party, XR Communications, LLC d/b/a Vivato Technologies, a licensing entity asserting an acquired patent portfolio (originally Vivato Networks, later transferred through Aequitas to XR). This is the classic profile of an operating company defending against a non-practicing entity rather than an NPE. Its one plaintiff-side appearance is a PTAB inter partes review petition (2018), i.e., a defensive validity challenge rather than an infringement suit.

Notable cases. Tracked suits span XR Communications v. Ruckus Wireless in the Central District of California (Judge Andrew Guilford) and the Northern District of California (2017, 2018, 2021), the related PTAB proceeding, and a Federal Circuit appeal captioned XR Communications v. ARRIS Solutions, Inc. et al., reflecting the Wi-Fi/MIMO technology at issue. XR's overlapping suits against other networking and telecom vendors have been litigated in the Western and Eastern Districts of Texas, but Ruckus's own tracked matters sit in California venues and the Federal Circuit.

Filing activity

2013: 1 case1'13'14'15'162017: 1 case'172018: 1 case'18'19'202021: 1 case'21
Cases filed per year naming Ruckus Wireless, Inc. as defendant.

XR Communications, LLC d/b/a Vivato Technologies v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc.

judgment of indefiniteness
Docket:
3:18-cv-01992
Filed:
2018-04-02

N.D. Cal. action before Judge William H. Orrick by XR Communications/Vivato against Ruckus. The complaint attached exhibits for the '296, '728, and '231 patents; the court entered a final judgment of indefiniteness as to the '231 patent claims, which was later given collateral-estoppel effect.

Macronix International Co., Ltd. et al. v. Spansion, Inc. et al.

terminated by settlement
Docket:
337-TA-909
Filed:
2013-12-27

Macronix entities filed a Section 337 complaint against Spansion entities and downstream respondents alleging infringement of US 6,100,557 (claims 1-3, 7, and 9-13) and other patents. The investigation was terminated by the January 2015 global settlement before any exclusion order issued.

XR Communications, LLC (d/b/a Vivato Technologies) v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc.

superseded/succeeded by N.D. Cal. action
Docket:
2:17-cv-02961
Patents:7877113

XR Communications, LLC asserted U.S. Patent 7,877,113 against Ruckus Wireless, Inc. in the Central District of California. The action was later superseded/succeeded by the Northern District of California action, and the parties disputed whether Ruckus Wireless, Inc. still existed as an entity after the ARRIS/Brocade transaction.

XR Communications, LLC (d/b/a Vivato Technologies) v. ARRIS Solutions, Inc. et al.

affirmed; rehearing denied
Docket:
2022-1125
Terminated:
2023-05-18

Federal Circuit appeal arising from the N.D. Cal. consolidated action. The court affirmed the district court's claim construction and held the disputed 'search receiver logic' term in U.S. Patent 6,611,231 invalid as indefinite; PatSnap describes the appeal as covering the five-patent portfolio including U.S. 7,877,113. Federal Circuit docket entries recorded AFFIRMED; a third-party record lists Appeal Dismissed (discrepancy unresolved).