Defendant
5 cases as defendant.
2021 wireless networking campaign case in N.D. Cal. against Ruckus Wireless; XR identified it as involving the '376 patent in its IPR2022-00613 mandatory notices.
N.D. Cal. action before Judge William H. Orrick by XR Communications/Vivato against Ruckus. The complaint attached exhibits for the '296, '728, and '231 patents; the court entered a final judgment of indefiniteness as to the '231 patent claims, which was later given collateral-estoppel effect.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, and was superseded by the N.D. Cal. action No. 3:18-cv-01992.
XR Communications, LLC asserted U.S. Patent 7,877,113 against Ruckus Wireless, Inc. in the Central District of California. The action was later superseded/succeeded by the Northern District of California action, and the parties disputed whether Ruckus Wireless, Inc. still existed as an entity after the ARRIS/Brocade transaction.
Federal Circuit appeal arising from the N.D. Cal. consolidated action. The court affirmed the district court's claim construction and held the disputed 'search receiver logic' term in U.S. Patent 6,611,231 invalid as indefinite; PatSnap describes the appeal as covering the five-patent portfolio including U.S. 7,877,113. Federal Circuit docket entries recorded AFFIRMED; a third-party record lists Appeal Dismissed (discrepancy unresolved).