XR Communications, LLC v. ARRIS Solutions, Inc.
consolidated- Docket:
- 4:18-cv-02736
- Filed:
- 2018-05-09
2018 Northern District of California case involving the '231 patent. It was related/consolidated by order on May 30, 2018, and resolved via appeal.
Plaintiff
14 cases as plaintiff.
Watchlist
Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when XR Communications, LLC files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.
2018 Northern District of California case involving the '231 patent. It was related/consolidated by order on May 30, 2018, and resolved via appeal.
2018 Central District of California case related to the N.D. Cal. Ruckus matter and involving the '231 patent. It was resolved via appeal Nos. 22-1125/22-1141.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was dismissed with prejudice by stipulation pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, and was covered by the invalidity/collateral-estoppel resolution.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path, and was subject to CAFC 22-1787/22-1789.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. Final judgment was entered for Cisco on April 15, 2022, on the pleadings of invalidity of the '231 patent based on collateral estoppel from the N.D. Cal. indefiniteness judgment.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. Final judgment was entered for Extreme Networks on April 15, 2022, on the same collateral-estoppel basis.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, then resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, and was superseded by the N.D. Cal. action No. 3:18-cv-01992.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, then resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path.
Lead consolidated 2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was stayed for IPRs and the '231 claims were held invalid via collateral estoppel.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, then resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path.
2017 Southern District of California case listed in the Stanford NPE Litigation Database and identified as part of the wave asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728; outcomes were not confirmed in the retrieved records.
Companion/member appeal from the same district-court campaign; terminated with affirmed ledgers reported.