Counsel registry
Covington & Burling
25 case appearances — 10 as plaintiff counsel · 15 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
Covington & Burling is a prominent multinational law firm, recognized as a BigLaw entity with its headquarters in Washington, D.C.. As of 2025, it was ranked #36 on the AmLaw Global 200 list by revenue, with over 1,200 lawyers globally. The firm maintains an extensive office footprint across the United States, including key locations like New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Palo Alto, and Boston, alongside a strong international presence in cities such as London, Brussels, Frankfurt, Seoul, and Shanghai. Chambers USA consistently recognizes Covington & Burling for its intellectual property practice, particularly in patent litigation.
Covington's patent litigation practice is highly regarded for its deep technical expertise and appellate talent. The firm's attorneys collectively have experience in over 700 patent cases, encompassing a wide range of technologies including computer and electronics, software, telecommunications, financial services, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and biotechnology. Chambers also highlights the firm's strength in handling high-stakes disputes for technology and pharmaceutical giants, often involving complex international IP litigations. The firm's IP litigation group, comprising over 130 attorneys, is equipped with extensive technical degrees, enhancing its ability to handle sophisticated technological matters.
The firm demonstrates a balanced approach in its patent litigation roles, representing both plaintiffs and defendants. While its tracked appearances show a slight inclination towards defendant-side work (3 defendant, 2 plaintiff), Covington frequently defends major operating companies, including technology leaders like Samsung, against infringement actions. For instance, the firm represented Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. as plaintiff in a case where the Federal Circuit affirmed the cancellation of a Netlist, Inc. memory patent, marking a significant appellate victory for Samsung. Additionally, Covington acted as lead counsel for DISH Technologies, LLC in a patent infringement suit concerning streaming technology, which concluded in a voluntary dismissal following a settlement.
Covington also possesses a robust Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice, having handled over 200 America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings for both petitioners and patent owners. The PTAB practice is notably bolstered by the expertise of former high-ranking Administrative Patent Judges, enabling the firm to advise clients on integrated litigation and PTAB strategies. Key partners in the firm's patent litigation practice include Christopher Sipes, co-chair of the patent litigation practice group, known for his work in Hatch-Waxman cases and trade secrets, and Robert Haslam, recognized for substantial experience in high-stakes IP, patent, and trade secrets disputes within the technology and life sciences sectors. Brian Nester and George Pappas are also prominent figures, with Nester maintaining a respected patent and trade secrets practice, particularly before the ITC and PTAB, and Pappas being an esteemed litigator in bet-the-company IP disputes, especially within the pharmaceutical sector.
Attorneys
Roles
- Counsel63
- lead counsel23
- Lead Counsel18
- counsel13
- Likely counsel8
- core litigation team6
- Pro Hac Vice1
- attorney1
- partner1
Cases (25)
- Δ defendantBOE Technology Group Co Ltd v. Samsung Display Co LtdJeffrey H. Lerner · Likely counsel
- π plaintiffDISH Technologies, LLC et al. v. A Parent Media Co. Inc. et al.Brian R. Nester · lead counsel
- Δ defendantGreenthread LLC v. Cirrus Logic, Inc. et al.Scott Weidenfeller · lead counsel
- Δ defendantJuul Labs Inc. v. Altria et al.Anne Y. Lee · counsel
- Δ defendantMimzi, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Brian G. Bieluch · lead counsel
- Δ defendantNetlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Alan Rabinowitz · Pro Hac Vice
- π plaintiffSamsung Display Co., Ltd. v. BOE Technology Group Co.Daniel W. Cho · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Netlist, Inc.Peter A. Swanson · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Samsung Display Co LtdJeffrey H. Lerner · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseRobert T. Haslam · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseJeffrey H. Lerner · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDaniel W. Cho · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseD. Scot Shrader · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseDaniel W. Cho · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseJeffrey H. Lerner · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseTarek Austin · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseAnupam Sharma · counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseDaniel W. Cho · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseTarek Austin · Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRichard L. Rainey · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRanganath Sudarshan · counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseKevin B. Collins · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRobert T. Haslam · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRobert T. Haslam · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRobert T. Haslam · Lead Counsel