Patent litigation attorney
Jeffrey H. Lerner
4 tracked appearances — 2 plaintiff · 2 defendant.
Specialty & background
Jeffrey H. Lerner is a Vice Chair of Covington & Burling's Patent Litigation Group, specializing in complex patent disputes across various advanced technologies. His practice encompasses federal district courts, the International Trade Commission (ITC), and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Mr. Lerner handles a broad array of technology areas, including pharmaceutical products, DNA technology, semiconductor devices, advanced materials, electronics, medical devices, and software. His practice demonstrates experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants. For example, he has defended clients such as Samsung Display Co Ltd in patent infringement cases related to OLED display technology and Unified Patents. He also represented Knowles as a complainant in Section 337 Investigations concerning MEMS microphone packages.
Throughout his career at Covington & Burling, Mr. Lerner has been involved in several notable cases. He represented Samsung Electronics and Samsung Display in a patent infringement case concerning LCD display technology in the District of Delaware. He also secured a summary judgment for Manheim Auctions Inc. in a patent infringement case involving software, which was later affirmed by the Federal Circuit. In the case of BOE Technology Group Co Ltd v. Samsung Display Co Ltd, Mr. Lerner was counsel for Samsung Display, which ultimately resulted in a settlement and royalty payments to Samsung.
While Covington & Burling's patent litigation practice has experience with reexamination requests and has successfully handled IPR proceedings, including for clients like Indivior and Biogen, Mr. Lerner's individual regular appearances in IPR/PGR proceedings are not explicitly detailed.
Mr. Lerner received his B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania in 2000 and served a judicial clerkship for Hon. Amalya L. Kearse of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 2003-2004. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Illinois.
Firms
Roles
- Counsel3
- Likely counsel1
Cases (4)
- Δ defendantBOE Technology Group Co Ltd v. Samsung Display Co LtdCovington & Burling · Likely counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. Samsung Display Co LtdCovington & Burling · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseCovington & Burling · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseCovington & Burling · Counsel