Invalidity dossier

US 9155705

DPP-IV inhibitor combined with a further antidiabetic agent, tablets comprising such formulations, their use and process for their preparation

Current assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG

Added 9/16/2026, 6:46:41 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. +2

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 9,155,705 B2

Title: DPP-IV inhibitor combined with a further antidiabetic agent, tablets comprising such formulations, their use and process for their preparation.

Assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (original and current assignee per the listing).

Key dates: Priority date 2008-04-03; filing date 2009-04-02; publication of US20110206766A1 on 2011-08-25; granted 2015-10-13. Status listed as Active with adjusted expiration 2030-05-21. These are the source's stated assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Application: US12/935,634. Inventors listed: Thomas Friedl, Michael Braun, Kenji Egusa, Hikaru Fujita, Megumi Maruyama, Takaaki Nishioka.

Purpose and plain-language scope: The title indicates the invention concerns combining a DPP-IV inhibitor with another antidiabetic agent, and tablet formulations of that combination, plus their use and a manufacturing process. The excerpt lists numerous chemical structures, including one (TTYUNRVFZJWXHB-MRXNPFEDSA-N) that is the only entry weighted in the description, plus about twenty other compounds also associated with the description, and a Markush-type formula: [1*]N1C(=O)C2=C(C(C#N)=C([2*])N2CC#CC)N(C)C1=O and variants. Classification codes cluster in A61K (medical preparations), including A61K31/522 (purine derivatives with oxo groups, e.g. xanthines), A61K45/06 (mixtures of active ingredients), and A61K47/18 (amines, amides, amino acids as formulation components), consistent with a combined oral tablet containing a DPP-IV inhibitor. Prior-art keywords supplied are "methyl," "pharmaceutical composition," "tablet," "dpp," and "composition according." The excerpt also lists Delaware District Court case links (1:20-cv-01153; 1:21-cv-00530; 1:24-cv-01091), noted here only as present in the source, not analyzed.

What the excerpt does not establish: It contains no claim text, no explicit identification of which named compound is the DPP-IV inhibitor or which is the "further antidiabetic agent," no dosages, ratios, excipients, or process steps, and no written description supporting specific claim scope. Litigation, ownership, validity, and prior art are outside this overview.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9155705/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:28 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9155705. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring