Plaintiff

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.

1 case as plaintiff.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
—
Top venue
D. Delaware
1 case

Company profile

I'll verify the company's profile before writing.

Company overview. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the U.S. prescription-pharmaceutical operating subsidiary of the Boehringer Ingelheim group, headquartered at 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut; it is a Delaware corporation qualified in the U.S. since 1971. Per its Rule 7.1 disclosure statement in the case below, its corporate parent is C. H. Boehringer Sohn AG & Co. KG, the family-owned holding company of the group (group HQ: Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany; founded 1885). The group is privately held, not publicly traded, and reported 2024 net sales of €26.8 billion with roughly 54,500 employees worldwide and ~€6.2 billion (~23% of sales) spent on R&D (company "2024 Highlights"; boehringer-ingelheim.com).

Products / operations. It is a research-based pharmaceutical manufacturer, not an NPE. Group operations span two business units: Human Pharma and Animal Health, the latter among the world's largest veterinary vaccine and therapeutic businesses. Human Pharma focuses on cardiovascular/metabolic, oncology, respiratory, immunology, mental health and retinal health, with marketed brands including Jardiance (empagliflozin), Trajenta/Jentadueto (linagliptin), Spiriva, Ofev and Pradaxa (company materials).

Patent-litigation posture. Our database shows one tracked matter, with this entity as plaintiff and zero as defendant — consistent with an operating company enforcing brand patents, not a patent assertion entity. Specifically, it is an active Hatch-Waxman/ANDA plaintiff in the District of Delaware, a common venue for pharmaceutical ANDA actions. Its litigation arises from FDA Paragraph IV certifications by generic filers rather than from an acquired assertion portfolio. The single-case count reflects this database's coverage, not Boehringer's overall litigation volume.

Notable case. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Granules India Limited (D. Del. 1:25-cv-00663, filed May 29, 2025) asserted four patents (U.S. 9,949,998; 10,258,637; 11,090,323; 11,833,166) against Granules' ANDA No. 220408 for 10 mg and 25 mg generic empagliflozin tablets, a generic version of Jardiance. The parties resolved the case by consent judgment entered September 2, 2025, which enjoined Granules' ANDA product until patent expiry and dismissed co-plaintiff Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation with prejudice (court docket/consent judgment).

Watchlist

Get alerted when Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Granules India Limited

dismissed
Docket:
1:24-cv-01091

Hatch-Waxman ANDA-style action brought by Boehringer Ingelheim entities against Granules India Limited over JENTADUETO (linagliptin/metformin HCl). The suit asserted US 9,415,016 B2 plus US 10,022,379 B2, US 11,911,388 B2, US 10,973,827 B2, and US 9,155,705 B2. It was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with plaintiffs preserving the right to re-assert.