Invalidity dossier

US 7071626

Plasma generator

Current assignee: Marukomu KK

Added 9/23/2026, 2:45:12 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,071,626 B2

Title: Plasma generator
Inventor: Manabu Harada
Original/Current Assignee (per listing): Marukomu KK / Kabushiki Kaisha Marukomu
Priority date: 2003-11-10 · Filing date: 2004-01-16 · Grant/publication date: 2006-07-04
Application number: US 10/759,955 · Other version: US 2005/0099134 A1
Legal status (as listed, not a legal conclusion): Expired – Fee Related; adjusted expiration 2024-08-20

Purpose. The patent addresses a trade-off in plasma generators used for deodorizing, bactericidal and air-cleaning apparatus: discharge between electrodes produces plasma whose ions/activated species (radicals) decompose airborne harmful substances (bacteria, viruses, pollen), but inevitably generates ozone, which is harmful and is environmentally limited to at most 0.05 ppm by, e.g., the Japan Air Cleaning Association. The stated object is to reliably decompose or remove harmful substances while preventing or controlling ozone generation.

Plain-language scope. In the disclosed arrangement, band plate-like first and second electrodes sit on opposite surfaces of a flat dielectric and are relatively displaced in the dielectric's surface direction, satisfying Equations 1–3 (not reproduced in the excerpt). The displacement quantity L₁ is the offset between the first electrode's front end edge A and the second electrode's corresponding end edge B; θ₂ is the "displacement angle" formed by an imaginary plane through A and B relative to the dielectric's thickness direction; d is dielectric thickness. Preferred values mentioned: θ₂ at least 45°; L₁/d from 1 to 3; applied voltage 2.5–3.5 kV. Alternative arrangements claimed include electrodes spaced in the same plane, and dielectric-film-coated electrode surfaces, each satisfying Equation 4. The stated mechanism is that lower average electron energy in the discharge field enlarges the ozone-molecule collision cross-section, promoting ozone decomposition via low-energy electron collisions, while displacement preserves electrostatic capacity and activated-species formation efficiency.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7071626/en

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not reproduce the actual text of Equations 1–4, all claims, the full description or drawings; it does not establish enforceability, validity, ownership history, or prior-art scope; and it provides no litigation or prosecution information.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:00 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7071626. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.