Invalidity dossier

US 6772227

Communicating between address spaces

Current assignee: Hanger Solutions, LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 5:24:10 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges3 lawsuits on fileasserted by Hanger Solutions, LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US6772227B2

Title: Communicating between address spaces

Patent number / application: US6772227B2; application US10/147,442.

Assignee: Original assignee IP Dynamics Inc. The source lists current assignee as Hanger Solutions LLC, but states that listed assignees may be inaccurate and that Google has not performed an analysis or warranty as to the list.

Key dates (per source): Priority date 1998-01-29; filing date 2002-05-16; publication of US20020184390A1 on 2002-12-05; granted/publication of US6772227B2 on 2004-08-03; anticipated expiration 2018-01-29. Legal status: Expired – Lifetime.

Inventor: Hasan S. Alkhatib.

Purpose: The definitions section states the invention "is directed to a system for using Internet domain names to route data sent to a destination on a network." The excerpt frames this against address exhaustion in Internet Protocol, the class-based address structure (Class A/B/C), CIDR, and the limitations of Network Address Translation (NAT). It explains NAT's use of global versus local (private) addresses and a gateway that substitutes a global address for the source machine's local address and maintains a translation table; inbound packets pass only when a validating connection exists. The excerpt identifies one problem: NAT "will not work if the communication is initiated by a host outside of the private network and is directed to a host with a local address on the private network."

Plain-language scope: On the supplied text, the patent concerns routing data to a destination on a network using Internet domain names rather than relying solely on numerical IP addresses, in a context where private/local addresses are not directly usable on the Internet and inbound-initiated communication is problematic under NAT. Classifications include H04L12/66 (gateways) and H04L61/4511 (DNS-based name-to-address mapping).

What the excerpt does not establish: No claims are reproduced, so the precise claimed scope and its limitations cannot be described. The detailed description, embodiments, and any prior-art references are absent. The definitions mention CIDR, IPv6/IPng, and TCP/IP but do not fully explain them. Nothing here establishes validity, infringement, or the accuracy of listed assignees or litigation data.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6772227](/patent/US6772227)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:37 PM

Cases on file (3)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6772227. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Lawsuits filed per year

2021: 2 cases2'212022: 1 case'22
Cases asserting US 6772227, by filing year.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Hanger Solutions, LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring