Invalidity dossier

US 6098098

System for managing the configuration of multiple computer devices

Current assignee: Hanger Solutions, LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 2:47:50 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by Hanger Solutions, LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,098,098

Title: System for managing the configuration of multiple computer devices

Patent number / application: US 6,098,098 A; application US 08/970,831

Inventors: Joel E. Sandahl and Lyle D. Baker

Original assignee: Enhanced Messaging Systems, Inc. (later listed assignees include Rayograph Limited, L.L.C.; Intellectual Ventures NetCon LLC; BlueCat Networks (USA), Inc.; and Hanger Solutions, LLC — as listed in the source, without analysis)

Key dates: Priority and filing 1997-11-14; granted and published 2000-08-01; anticipated expiration 2017-11-14; status "Expired – Lifetime"

Purpose: The invention relates to a system (method and apparatus) for managing the configuration of multiple computers that are connectable via a network to a network file server holding configuration information for each computer. It is described as useful for centrally managing a network system of computers that may be geographically remote from one another, such as in paging and other wireless messaging systems. The stated problem is difficulty maintaining each device's configuration so their inter-operation yields desired network-system operation, particularly where devices are locally configured at start-up or boot (e.g., autoexec.bat and config.sys under MS-DOS) and later altered locally without central detection or correction.

Plain-language scope (as described): Each computer device stores local configuration information and, on start-up, may download a program file from a network file server (described as BOOTP-TFTP). The system provides a network file server storing master configuration information for each computer device and provides for central control and revision of device configurations. A stated object is that each computer device compares data characterizing its master configuration information on the file server with data characterizing its local configuration information to determine whether they differ, rather than comparing the contents of the master and local configuration information. Further objects are described for detecting and correcting locally altered configurations so they are not left until device operation is adversely affected.

What the excerpt does not establish: It is only an excerpt. It does not provide the full claims, complete description, drawings, or any independent claim language. It therefore does not establish the precise claimed scope, claim limitations, or the full technical implementation. It also omits the remainder of the stated objects (the text cuts off mid-sentence).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6098098/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:57 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6098098. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Hanger Solutions, LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring